Economies of Scale and Scope in Multi-Utilities

This paper explores the economies of scale and scope in the electricity, gas and water utilities. These issues have a crucial importance in the actual policy debates about unbundling the integrated utilities into separate entities, a policy which has often been supported by the ongoing reforms in the deregulation of network industries. This paper argues that the potential improvements in efficiency through unbundling should be assessed against the loss of scope economies. Several econometric specifications including a random-coefficient model are used to estimate a cost function for a sample of utilities distributing electricity, gas and/or water to the Swiss population. The estimates of scale and scope economies are compared across different models and the effect of heterogeneity among companies are explored. While indicating considerable scope and scale economies overall, the results suggest a significant variation in scope economies across companies due to unobserved heterogeneity.

[1]  Giovanni Fraquelli,et al.  Scope and scale economies in multi-utilities: evidence from gas, water and electricity combinations , 2004 .

[2]  Multiproduct Monopoly, Regulation, and Firm Costs , 1984 .

[3]  R. P. Wilder,et al.  Multiproduct Monopoly, Regulation, and Firm Costs: Comment , 1986 .

[4]  Allen M. Featherstone,et al.  Measuring Economies of Scale and Scope in Agricultural Banking , 1994 .

[5]  John C. Panzar,et al.  Technological determinants of firm and industry structure , 1989 .

[6]  Dimitrios Asteriou,et al.  Applied Econometrics: A Modern Approach Using Eviews and Microfit , 2005 .

[7]  Don E. Waldman,et al.  Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice , 1997 .

[8]  G. Chamberlain Multivariate regression models for panel data , 1982 .

[9]  Massimo Filippini,et al.  Economies of scale and scope in local public transportation , 2007 .

[10]  John W. Mayo,et al.  The Technological Determinants of the U.S. Energy Industry Structure , 1984 .

[11]  A. Cameron,et al.  Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications , 2005 .

[12]  E. Biørn,et al.  Heterogeneity in Returns to Scale: A Random Coefficient Analysis with Unbalanced Panel Data , 2000 .

[13]  Sergio R. Jara-Díaz,et al.  Econometric estimation of scale and scope economies within the Port Sector: a review , 2007 .

[14]  E. Martínez-Budría,et al.  Adapting Productivity Theory to the Quadratic Cost Function. An Application to the Spanish Electric Sector , 2003 .

[15]  W. Baumol,et al.  Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure , 1982 .

[16]  Cheng Hsiao,et al.  Analysis of Panel Data , 1987 .

[17]  Adonis Yatchew,et al.  Scale economies in electricity distribution: a semiparametric analysis , 2000 .

[18]  A. Friedlaender,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH IN THE REGULATED TRUCKING INDUSTRY , 1983 .

[19]  M. Farsi,et al.  An analysis of cost efficiency in Swiss multi-utilities , 2008 .

[20]  D. Humphrey,et al.  The Role of Fixed Costs and Cost Complementarities in Determining Scope Economies and the Cost of Narrow Banking Proposals , 1993 .

[21]  Davide Vannoni,et al.  Choosing among alternative cost function specifications: an application to Italian multi-utilities , 2004 .

[22]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  Flexible Cost Functions for Multiproduct Firms , 1980 .

[23]  M. Sing Are Combination Gas and Electric Utilities Multiproduct Natural Monopolies , 1987 .

[24]  John W. Mayo,et al.  The Measurement of Vertical Economies and the Efficient Structure of the Electric Utility Industry , 1991 .

[25]  Y. Braunstein,et al.  A Composite Cost Function for Multiproduct Firms with an Application to Economies of Scope in Banking , 1992 .

[26]  U. Meister,et al.  Product-Market Competition in the Water Industry: Voluntary Non-discriminatory Pricing , 2005 .

[27]  Marno Verbeek,et al.  A Guide to Modern Econometrics , 2000 .

[28]  Matthias Walter,et al.  Quo vadis efficiency analysis of water distribution? A comparative literature review , 2009 .