Modified Navigation Instructions for Spatial Navigation Assistance Systems Lead to Incidental Spatial Learning

Spatial cognitive skills deteriorate with the increasing use of automated GPS navigation and a general decrease in the ability to orient in space might have further impact on independence, autonomy, and quality of life. In the present study we investigate whether modified navigation instructions support incidental spatial knowledge acquisition. A virtual driving environment was used to examine the impact of modified navigation instructions on spatial learning while using a GPS navigation assistance system. Participants navigated through a simulated urban and suburban environment, using navigation support to reach their destination. Driving performance as well as spatial learning was thereby assessed. Three navigation instruction conditions were tested: (i) a control group that was provided with classical navigation instructions at decision points, and two other groups that received navigation instructions at decision points including either (ii) additional irrelevant information about landmarks or (iii) additional personally relevant information (i.e., individual preferences regarding food, hobbies, etc.), associated with landmarks. Driving performance revealed no differences between navigation instructions. Significant improvements were observed in both modified navigation instruction conditions on three different measures of spatial learning and memory: subsequent navigation of the initial route without navigation assistance, landmark recognition, and sketch map drawing. Future navigation assistance systems could incorporate modified instructions to promote incidental spatial learning and to foster more general spatial cognitive abilities. Such systems might extend mobility across the lifespan.

[1]  Myra Blanco,et al.  The impact of secondary task cognitive processing demand on driving performance. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  S. Huettel,et al.  Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[3]  Louis Tijerina,et al.  Driver Workload Metrics Task 2 Final Report , 2006 .

[4]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[5]  Peter König,et al.  Cultural background shapes spatial reference frame proclivity , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[6]  James A. Landay,et al.  Personalizing routes , 2006, UIST.

[7]  Eliahu Stern,et al.  Levels of Spatial Knowledge and Urban Travel Modeling , 2010 .

[8]  T. B. Rogers,et al.  Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. , 1977, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Suzanna Becker,et al.  When Do Objects Become Landmarks? A VR Study of the Effect of Task Relevance on Spatial Memory , 2012, PloS one.

[10]  Cesare Cornoldi,et al.  Visuo-spatial working memory and individual differences , 2003 .

[11]  H. Zimmer,et al.  Navigation assistance: a trade-off between wayfinding support and configural learning support. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[12]  Gabriele Janzen,et al.  Memory consolidation of landmarks in good navigators , 2008, Hippocampus.

[13]  B. Reimer,et al.  The impact of distractions on young adult drivers with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Maximilian Schwalm,et al.  Computer-assisted navigation and the acquisition of route and survey knowledge , 2006 .

[15]  A. Siegel,et al.  The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. , 1975, Advances in child development and behavior.

[16]  Avi Parush,et al.  Degradation in Spatial Knowledge Acquisition When Using Automatic Navigation Systems , 2007, COSIT.

[17]  Gary E. Burnett,et al.  Learning-oriented vehicle navigation systems: a preliminary investigation in a driving simulator , 2008, Mobile HCI.

[18]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[19]  D. R. Montello,et al.  Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: Individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  Herbert A. Colle,et al.  Dual-Coded Advisory Turn Indicators for GPS Navigational Guidance of Surface Vehicles , 2013, Hum. Factors.

[22]  Herbert A Colle,et al.  Using a single map display both for navigational planning and for turn-by-turn vehicle guidance: configural spatial knowledge acquisition. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[23]  Klaus Gramann,et al.  Spatial Cognition & Computation: an Interdisciplinary Journal Embodiment of Spatial Reference Frames and Individual Differences in Reference Frame Proclivity Embodiment of Spatial Reference Frames and Individual Differences in Reference Frame Proclivity , 2022 .

[24]  John D Lee,et al.  Combining cognitive and visual distraction: less than the sum of its parts. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  Gary Burnett,et al.  The Effect of Vehicle Navigation Systems on the Formation of Cognitive Maps , 2005 .

[26]  Christhard Gelau,et al.  The occlusion technique: a procedure to assess the HMI of in-vehicle information and communication systems. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.

[27]  Wen-Chen Lee,et al.  Effects of using a portable navigation system and paper map in real driving. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  Claudio Aporta,et al.  Satellite Culture , 2005, Current Anthropology.

[29]  C. Lawton.  Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety , 1994 .

[30]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  In-car gps navigation: engagement with and disengagement from the environment , 2008, CHI.

[31]  Gary Burnett,et al.  ‘Turn right at the Traffic Lights’: The Requirement for Landmarks in Vehicle Navigation Systems , 2000, Journal of Navigation.

[32]  G. Allen,et al.  The role of perceptual context in structuring spatial knowledge. , 1978 .

[33]  Hermann J Müller,et al.  Evidence of separable spatial representations in a virtual navigation task. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Fergus I. M. Craik,et al.  Effects of Elaboration of Processing at Encoding and Retrieval: Trace Distinctiveness and Recovery of Initial Context , 2014 .

[35]  Stephan Winter,et al.  A wayfinding aid to increase navigator independence , 2011, J. Spatial Inf. Sci..

[36]  L A Streeter,et al.  A Profile of Drivers' Map-Reading Abilities , 1986, Human factors.

[37]  Hermann J. Müller,et al.  Human Brain Dynamics Accompanying Use of Egocentric and Allocentric Reference Frames during Navigation , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  Andrew J. May,et al.  Presence and Quality of Navigational Landmarks: Effect on Driver Performance and Implications for Design , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[39]  Deborah A. Boehm-Davis,et al.  Navigational preference and driver acceptance of advanced traveler information systems , 1997 .

[40]  Gabriele Janzen,et al.  Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.