Prioritizing Consumption‐Based Carbon Policy Based on the Evaluation of Mitigation Potential Using Input‐Output Methods

Carbon footprints aim to engage consumers in contributing to climate†change mitigation. Consumption†oriented policy measures attempt to cause voluntary or incentivized interventions that reduce environmental impact through the supply chain by utilizing demand drivers. A large body of life cycle assessment studies describe how specific actions can reduce the environmental footprint of an individual or household. However, these assessments are often conducted with a narrow focus on particular goods and processes. Here, we formalize a counterfactual method and operational tool for scoping the potential impact of such actions, focusing on economy†wide impact. This “quickscan†tool can model shifts and reductions in demand, rebound effects (using marginal expenditure), changes in domestic and international production recipes, and reductions in the environmental intensity of production. This tool provides quick, macro†level estimates of the efficacy of consumer†oriented policy measures and can help to prioritize relevant policies. We demonstrate the method using two case studies on diet and clothing using the EXIOBASE3 multiregional input†output database, giving spatially explicit information on where environmental impact reductions of the interventions occur, and where impacts may increase in the case of rebounds.

[1]  J. Minx,et al.  INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS AND CARBON FOOTPRINTING: AN OVERVIEW OF APPLICATIONS , 2009 .

[2]  G. T. Gardner,et al.  Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  A. Horvath,et al.  Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains , 2009 .

[4]  J. Munksgaard,et al.  Using Input‐Output Analysis to Measure the Environmental Pressure of Consumption at Different Spatial Levels , 2005 .

[5]  Richard Wood,et al.  When Do Allocations and Constructs Respect Material, Energy, Financial, and Production Balances in LCA and EEIO? , 2016 .

[6]  Matthew J. Kotchen,et al.  Energy policy: The rebound effect is overplayed , 2013, Nature.

[7]  R. Goldbohm,et al.  Environmental impacts of changes to healthier diets in Europe , 2011 .

[8]  Christopher M. Jones,et al.  Spatial distribution of U.S. household carbon footprints reveals suburbanization undermines greenhouse gas benefits of urban population density. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Julian M. Allwood,et al.  The Role of Washing Machines in Life Cycle Assessment Studies , 2009 .

[10]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Climate policy through changing consumption choices: Options and obstacles for reducing greenhouse gas emissions , 2014 .

[11]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  Climate benefits of changing diet , 2009 .

[12]  Arnold Tukker,et al.  Growth in Environmental Footprints and Environmental Impacts Embodied in Trade: Resource Efficiency Indicators from EXIOBASE3 , 2018 .

[13]  Sarah Schmidt,et al.  EXIOBASE 3: Developing a Time Series of Detailed Environmentally Extended Multi‐Regional Input‐Output Tables , 2018 .

[14]  Richard Wood,et al.  Unified Theory of Allocations and Constructs in Life Cycle Assessment and Input‐Output Analysis , 2014 .

[15]  Matthias Pfaff,et al.  Economy-wide rebound effects for non-energetic raw materials , 2015 .

[16]  Kate Scott,et al.  Link between climate change mitigation and resource efficiency: A UK case study , 2012 .

[17]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  New Energy Externalities Developments for Sustainability , 2006 .

[18]  L. Panzone Saving money vs investing money: Do energy ratings influence consumer demand for energy efficient goods? , 2013 .

[19]  Richard Wood,et al.  The Carbon Footprint of Norwegian Household Consumption 1999–2012 , 2016 .

[20]  Bettina Mihalyi,et al.  Recycling of Fibre Materials , 2005 .

[21]  Bastien Girod,et al.  GHG reduction potential of changes in consumption patterns and higher quality levels: Evidence from Swiss household consumption survey , 2009 .

[22]  L. Baroni,et al.  Evaluating the environmental impact of various dietary patterns combined with different food production systems , 2007, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[23]  B. Weidema,et al.  carbon footprint , 2020, Catalysis from A to Z.

[24]  A. Washizu,et al.  An Analysis of Sustainable Consumption by the Waste Input‐Output Model , 2005 .

[25]  Kate Scott,et al.  Meeting the UK climate change challenge: The contribution of resource efficiency , 2009 .

[26]  R. N. Ely,et al.  Simulating the impact of new industries on the economy: The case of biorefining in Australia , 2014 .

[27]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Carbon footprint of nations: a global, trade-linked analysis. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  Jens Borken-Kleefeld,et al.  Mode, load, and specific climate impact from passenger trips. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  W. Leontief Environmental Repercussions and the Economic Structure: An Input-Output Approach , 1970 .

[30]  Cameron K. Murray What if consumers decided to all 'go green'? Environmental rebound effects from consumption decisions , 2013 .

[31]  C. N. Hewitt,et al.  The relative greenhouse gas impacts of realistic dietary choices , 2012 .

[32]  T. Meier,et al.  Environmental impacts of dietary recommendations and dietary styles: Germany as an example. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  D. O'Rourke The science of sustainable supply chains , 2014, Science.

[34]  H. S. Matthews,et al.  Quantifying the global and distributional aspects of American household carbon footprint , 2008 .

[35]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Economic, energy and greenhouse emissions impacts of some consumer choice, technology and government outlay options , 2002 .

[36]  G. T. Gardner,et al.  The Short List: The Most Effective Actions U.S. Households Can Take to Curb Climate Change , 2008 .

[37]  Sarah E. West,et al.  Evaluating the Use of a Carbon Footprint Calculator: Communicating Impacts of Consumption at Household Level and Exploring Mitigation Options , 2016 .

[38]  Adam Rose,et al.  Technological change and input-output analysis: An appraisal , 1984 .

[39]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  HARMONISING NATIONAL INPUT—OUTPUT TABLES FOR CONSUMPTION-BASED ACCOUNTING — EXPERIENCES FROM EXIOPOL , 2014 .

[40]  M. Lenzen,et al.  The path exchange method for hybrid LCA. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[41]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Life cycle assessment as a means to identify the most effective action for sustainable consumption , 2015 .

[42]  David Font Vivanco,et al.  The rebound effect through industrial ecology’s eyes: a review of LCA-based studies , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[43]  Arnold Tukker,et al.  Global Sustainability Accounting—Developing EXIOBASE for Multi-Regional Footprint Analysis , 2014 .

[44]  Subramanian Senthilkannan Muthu,et al.  Quantification of environmental impact and ecological sustainability for textile fibres , 2012 .

[45]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment of Household Consumption , 2016 .

[46]  J. Grabs The rebound effects of switching to vegetarianism. A microeconomic analysis of Swedish consumption behavior , 2015 .

[47]  G. West,et al.  Comparison of Input–Output, Input–Output + Econometric and Computable General Equilibrium Impact Models at the Regional Level , 1995 .

[48]  Youjiang Wang Fiber and Textile Waste Utilization , 2010 .

[49]  Richard Wood,et al.  A Methodology for Integrated, Multiregional Life Cycle Assessment Scenarios under Large-Scale Technological Change. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[50]  Stephan Moll,et al.  Price corrected domestic technology assumption--a method to assess pollution embodied in trade using primary official statistics only. With a case on CO2 emissions embodied in imports to Europe. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[51]  E. Hertwich Consumption and the Rebound Effect: An Industrial Ecology Perspective , 2005 .

[52]  M. Haque Income Elasticity and Economic Development: Methods and Applications , 2005 .

[53]  Stefan Pauliuk,et al.  Global carbon benefits of material substitution in passenger cars until 2050 and the impact on the steel and aluminum industries. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[54]  Terry Barker,et al.  The macroeconomic rebound effect and the world economy , 2009 .

[55]  M. Abdelguerfi,et al.  Introduction 1.2 Parallel Database Systems 1.2.1 Computation Model 2 1.2 Parallel Database Systems Introduction Select * from Employee, Department Where (employee.dept_no @bullet Department.dept_no) and (employee.position = "manager") (a) Sql Request 1.2.2 Engineering Model , 2022 .

[56]  Industrial Strategy,et al.  Energy Consumption in the UK , 2020 .

[57]  E. Hertwich THE LIFE CYCLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF CONSUMPTION , 2011 .

[58]  Christopher M. Jones,et al.  Quantifying carbon footprint reduction opportunities for U.S. households and communities. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[59]  B. Weidema,et al.  Carbon Footprint , 2008 .

[60]  S. Sorrell Jevons’ Paradox revisited: The evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency , 2009 .

[61]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Low carbon lifestyles: A framework to structure consumption strategies and options to reduce carbon footprints , 2016 .

[62]  M. Finkbeiner Carbon footprinting—opportunities and threats , 2009 .

[63]  Albert Faber,et al.  Investigating new technologies in a scenario context: description and application of an input–output method , 2008 .

[64]  Dale W. Jorgenson,et al.  Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling , 2012 .

[65]  Richard Wood,et al.  AUSTRALIA'S CARBON FOOTPRINT , 2009 .

[66]  René Kemp,et al.  The remarkable environmental rebound effect of electric cars: a microeconomic approach. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[67]  Klaus Hubacek,et al.  The Impact of Social Factors and Consumer Behavior on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the United Kingdom , 2010 .