Issues of interpretation after relating comparative datasets to phylogeny

[1]  M. Rees.  EC-PC Comparative Analyses? , 1995 .

[2]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seed Size and Phylogeny in Six Temperate Floras: Constraints, Niche Conservatism, and Adaptation , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[3]  A. Fitter.  Interpreting Quantitative and Qualitative Characteristics in Comparative Analyses , 1995 .

[4]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Phylogeny and Ecology Reconsidered , 1995 .

[5]  Michelle R. Leishman,et al.  Further Remarks on Phylogenetic Correction , 1995 .

[6]  P. Harvey,et al.  Further Remarks on the Role of Phylogeny in Comparative Ecology , 1995 .

[7]  Michelle R. Leishman,et al.  On misinterpreting the phylogenetic correction , 1995 .

[8]  P. Harvey,et al.  Why Ecologists Need to be Phylogenetically Challenged , 1995 .

[9]  S. Nee,et al.  Inference from binary comparative data , 1995 .

[10]  A. Fitter,et al.  COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF BRITISH ANGIOSPERMS , 1994 .

[11]  M. Pagel.  Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Doug P. Armstrong,et al.  Seedlings from Large Seeds Tolerated Defoliation Better: A Test Using Phylogeneticaly Independent Contrasts , 1993 .

[13]  P. Sherman,et al.  Adaptation and the Goals of Evolutionary Research , 1993, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[14]  E. Garnier.  Growth analysis of congeneric annual and perennial grass species , 1992 .

[15]  M. Pagel.  A method for the analysis of comparative data , 1992 .

[16]  Susan A. Foster,et al.  The relationship between seed size and establishment conditions in tropical woody plants , 1985 .