Revealing the information contents of memory within the stimulus information representation framework

The information contents of memory are the cornerstone of the most influential models in cognition. To illustrate, consider that in predictive coding, a prediction implies that specific information is propagated down from memory through the visual hierarchy. Likewise, recognizing the input implies that sequentially accrued sensory evidence is successfully matched with memorized information (categorical knowledge). Although the existing models of prediction, memory, sensory representation and categorical decision are all implicitly cast within an information processing framework, it remains a challenge to precisely specify what this information is, and therefore where, when and how the architecture of the brain dynamically processes it to produce behaviour. Here, we review a framework that addresses these challenges for the studies of perception and categorization–stimulus information representation (SIR). We illustrate how SIR can reverse engineer the information contents of memory from behavioural and brain measures in the context of specific cognitive tasks that involve memory. We discuss two specific lessons from this approach that generally apply to memory studies: the importance of task, to constrain what the brain does, and of stimulus variations, to identify the specific information contents that are memorized, predicted, recalled and replayed. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue ‘Memory reactivation: replaying events past, present and future’.

[1]  N. Wiener,et al.  Nonlinear Problems in Random Theory , 1964 .

[2]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Matching Categorical Object Representations in Inferior Temporal Cortex of Man and Monkey , 2008, Neuron.

[3]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Rhythmic TMS over Parietal Cortex Links Distinct Brain Frequencies to Global versus Local Visual Processing , 2011, Current Biology.

[4]  Karin Ackermann,et al.  Categories and Concepts , 2003, Job 28. Cognition in Context.

[5]  J. S. Guntupalli,et al.  Decoding neural representational spaces using multivariate pattern analysis. , 2014, Annual review of neuroscience.

[6]  Philippe G Schyns,et al.  Diagnostic recognition: task constraints, object information, and their interactions , 1998, Cognition.

[7]  Pascal Belin,et al.  Auditory smiles trigger unconscious facial imitation , 2018, Current Biology.

[8]  P. Schyns,et al.  Rhythmic TMS Causes Local Entrainment of Natural Oscillatory Signatures , 2011, Current Biology.

[9]  M. Diamond,et al.  Neuronal Encoding of Texture in the Whisker Sensory Pathway , 2005, PLoS biology.

[10]  J. Gallant,et al.  Complete functional characterization of sensory neurons by system identification. , 2006, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  A. Ahumada,et al.  Stimulus Features in Signal Detection , 1971 .

[12]  P. Schyns,et al.  Categorization creates functional features , 1997 .

[13]  P. Schyns,et al.  Blind to Object Changes: When Learning the Same Object at Different Levels of Categorization Modifies Its Perception , 1999 .

[14]  Vasilis Z. Marmarelis,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamic Modeling of Physiological Systems , 2004 .

[15]  Cheryl Olman,et al.  Classification objects, ideal observers & generative models , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  Jared F. Danker,et al.  The ghosts of brain states past: remembering reactivates the brain regions engaged during encoding. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  H. Bowman,et al.  The Temporal Signature of Memories: Identification of a General Mechanism for Dynamic Memory Replay in Humans , 2016, PLoS biology.

[18]  Robin A. A. Ince,et al.  Dynamic Construction of Reduced Representations in the Brain for Perceptual Decision Behavior , 2018, Current Biology.

[19]  P. Schyns,et al.  Receptive Fields for Flexible Face Categorizations , 2004, Psychological science.

[20]  Michelle R. Greene,et al.  Visual Noise from Natural Scene Statistics Reveals Human Scene Category Representations , 2014, ArXiv.

[21]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks , 2001, Vision Research.

[22]  D. Sauter,et al.  Commonalities outweigh differences in the communication of emotions across human cultures [Letter to the editor] , 2013 .

[23]  Alexander Todorov,et al.  Reverse Correlating Social Face Perception , 2012 .

[24]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  The Deceptively Simple N170 Reflects Network Information Processing Mechanisms Involving Visual Feature Coding and Transfer Across Hemispheres , 2016, bioRxiv.

[25]  Jeffrey D. Johnson,et al.  Episodic retrieval involves early and sustained effects of reactivating information from encoding , 2015, NeuroImage.

[26]  Dario L. Ringach,et al.  Reverse correlation in neurophysiology , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[27]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  E. Rosch,et al.  Categorization of Natural Objects , 1981 .

[29]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The development of features in object concepts , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  P. Schyns,et al.  Measuring Internal Representations from Behavioral and Brain Data , 2012, Current Biology.

[31]  Marco Liuni,et al.  CLEESE: An open-source audio-transformation toolbox for data-driven experiments in speech and music cognition , 2018, bioRxiv.

[32]  A. Wagner,et al.  Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It , 2015 .

[33]  Vito Volterra,et al.  Theory of Functionals and of Integral and Integro-Differential Equations , 2005 .

[34]  Radoslaw Martin Cichy,et al.  Resolving human object recognition in space and time , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  Richard F Murray,et al.  Classification images: A review. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[36]  Philippe G Schyns,et al.  Perceptual moments of conscious visual experience inferred from oscillatory brain activity. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Robert C. Wolpert,et al.  A Review of the , 1985 .

[38]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Big Book of Concepts , 2002 .

[39]  Oliver G. B. Garrod,et al.  Modelling face memory reveals task-generalizable representations , 2019, Nature Human Behaviour.

[40]  Vasilis Z. Marmarelis,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamic Modeling of Physiological Systems: Marmarelis/Nonlinear , 2004 .

[41]  W. O. Brimijoin,et al.  The internal representation of vowel spectra investigated using behavioral response-triggered averaging. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  Oliver G. B. Garrod,et al.  Facial expressions of emotion are not culturally universal , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Philippe G. Schyns,et al.  Retinotopic sensitisation to spatial scale: Evidence for flexible spatial frequency processing in scene perception , 2006, Vision Research.

[44]  Robert E. Hampson,et al.  System identification of point-process neural systems using Probability Based Volterra kernels , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[45]  J. Eggermont Wiener and Volterra analyses applied to the auditory system , 1993, Hearing Research.

[46]  W. Penny,et al.  Replay of Very Early Encoding Representations during Recollection , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  P. Schyns,et al.  Entrainment of Perceptually Relevant Brain Oscillations by Non-Invasive Rhythmic Stimulation of the Human Brain , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[48]  Timothy E. J. Behrens,et al.  Human Replay Spontaneously Reorganizes Experience , 2019, Cell.

[49]  Alexander Todorov,et al.  Data-driven methods for modeling social perception , 2011 .

[50]  J. Webster,et al.  Wiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering , 2010 .

[51]  Lars Muckli,et al.  Classification images reveal the information sensitivity of brain voxels in fMRI , 2008, NeuroImage.

[52]  Rachael E. Jack,et al.  Toward a Social Psychophysics of Face Communication , 2017, Annual review of psychology.

[53]  S. Jeune,et al.  Diagnostic , 1982, Thromboses Veineuses Distales et Superficielles.

[54]  Biao Huang,et al.  System Identification , 2000, Control Theory for Physicists.

[55]  P. Belin,et al.  Cracking the social code of speech prosody using reverse correlation , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Robin A A Ince,et al.  Eye coding mechanisms in early human face event-related potentials. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[57]  P. Schyns,et al.  Superstitious Perceptions Reveal Properties of Internal Representations , 2003, Psychological science.

[58]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Tracing the Flow of Perceptual Features in an Algorithmic Brain Network , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[59]  Lucy S. Petro,et al.  Dynamics of Visual Information Integration in the Brain for Categorizing Facial Expressions , 2007, Current Biology.

[60]  Rufin Vogels,et al.  Stimulus features coded by single neurons of a macaque body category selective patch , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[61]  P. Schyns,et al.  Show Me the Features! Understanding Recognition From the Use of Visual Information , 2002, Psychological science.

[62]  S. Hanslmayr,et al.  Rapid Memory Reactivation Revealed by Oscillatory Entrainment , 2012, Current Biology.