Effect of memory load on eye movement control: A study using the reading span test

We investigated the effect of memory load on attentional control using the Reading Span Test (RST), a task that requires working memory capacity. Previous studies have shown that a shortage of working memory resources leads to a deficit of inhibition of taskirrelevant information and that memory load affects eye movement control. Here, we recorded eye movement and integrated it with RST performance. Total fixation time and the number of regressions showed a memory load effect with the to-be-remembered word, and RST performance was also affected under high memory load. We concluded that a shortage of working memory resources caused by memory load prevents flexible eye movement control and may cause a deficit in inhibitory control based on intrusion errors.

[1]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[2]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  The Role of Working Memory in Language Comprehension , 1988 .

[3]  R. Engle,et al.  Is working memory capacity task dependent , 1989 .

[4]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[5]  Mariko Osaka,et al.  Language-independent working memory as measured by Japanese and English reading span tests , 1992 .

[6]  R. Engle,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: a test of four hypotheses. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Mariko Osaka,et al.  Language-independent working memory: Evidence from German and French reading span tests , 1993 .

[8]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Less Skilled Readers Have Less Efficient Suppression Mechanisms , 1993, Psychological science.

[9]  M. Osaka,et al.  [Working memory capacity related to reading: measurement with the Japanese version of reading span test]. , 1994, Shinrigaku kenkyu : The Japanese journal of psychology.

[10]  M. Daneman,et al.  Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  Francesca Pazzaglia,et al.  Increases in Intrusion Errors and Working Memory Deficit of Poor Comprehenders , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Working memory, inhibitory control, and reading disability , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  Michael F. Bunting,et al.  The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  M. Osaka,et al.  Individual differences in working memory during reading with and without parafoveal information: a moving-window study. , 2002, The American journal of psychology.

[16]  Mariko Osaka,et al.  Effect of focus on verbal working memory: Critical role of the focus word in reading , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  How prior knowledge, WMC, and relevance of information affect eye fixations in expository text. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  R. Engle,et al.  Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading: Models and data , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  Akira Miyake,et al.  The reading span test and its predictive power for reading comprehension ability , 2004 .

[21]  Michael F. Bunting,et al.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  Cesare Cornoldi,et al.  Updating in working memory: a comparison of good and poor comprehenders. , 2005, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[23]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory , 2005, Nature.

[24]  Mariko Osaka,et al.  Neural bases of focusing attention in working memory: An fMRI study based on group differences , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[25]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  Strategy use in the reading span test: An analysis of eye movements and reported encoding strategies , 2007, Memory.

[26]  Mariko Osaka,et al.  Neural bases of focusing attention in working memory , 2007 .

[27]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and divided attention in dichotic listening , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  A. Baddeley Working Memory, Thought, and Action , 2007 .

[29]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[30]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Variation in working memory , 2008 .

[31]  Delphine Fagot,et al.  Working memory and inhibitory control across the life span: Intrusion errors in the Reading Span Test , 2009, Memory & cognition.

[32]  E. Borella,et al.  The effect of age and individual differences in attentional control: a sample case using the Hayling test. , 2011, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[33]  E. Vogel,et al.  Individual Differences in Recovery Time From Attentional Capture , 2011, Psychological science.

[34]  M. Osaka,et al.  High working memory performers have efficient eye movement control systems under Reading Span Test , 2012 .

[35]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Variation in Working Memory Capacity as Variation in Executive Attention and Control , 2012 .

[36]  B. Postle,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of working memory. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.