Insights on the Use of Hybrid Life Cycle Assessment for Environmental Footprinting

Establishing a comprehensive environmental footprint that indicates resource use and environmental release hotspots in both direct and indirect operations can help companies formulate impact reduction strategies as part of overall sustainability efforts. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a useful approach for achieving these objectives. For most companies, financial data are more readily available than material and energy quantities, which suggests a hybrid LCA approach that emphasizes use of economic input‐output (EIO) LCA and process‐based energy and material flow models to frame and develop life cycle emission inventories resulting from company activities. We apply a hybrid LCA framework to an inland marine transportation company that transports bulk commodities within the United States. The analysis focuses on global warming potential, acidification, particulate matter emissions, eutrophication, ozone depletion, and water use. The results show that emissions of greenhouse gases, sulfur, and particulate matter are mainly from direct activities but that supply chain impacts are also significant, particularly in terms of water use. Hotspots were identified in the production, distribution, and use of fuel; the manufacturing, maintenance, and repair of boats and barges; food production; personnel air transport; and solid waste disposal. Results from the case study demonstrate that the aforementioned footprinting framework can provide a sufficiently reliable and comprehensive baseline for a company to formulate, measure, and monitor its efforts to reduce environmental impacts from internal and supply chain operations.

[1]  J. Hoekstra Advancing Conservation in a Globalized World , 2008 .

[2]  Frieder Rubik,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment in Industry and Business , 2000 .

[3]  W. Leontief Input-output economics , 1967 .

[4]  Patrick Hofstetter,et al.  Perspectives in Life Cycle Impact Assessment: A Structured Approach to Combine Models of the Technosphere, Ecosphere and Valuesphere , 2012 .

[5]  M. Goedkoop,et al.  The Eco-indicator 99, A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 1999 .

[6]  S. Knox,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: Exploring Stakeholder Relationships and Programme Reporting across Leading FTSE Companies , 2005 .

[7]  P. Brønn,et al.  Corporate Motives for Social Initiative: Legitimacy, Sustainability, or the Bottom Line? , 2009 .

[8]  Jiří Jaromír Klemeš,et al.  The Environmental Performance Strategy Map: an integrated LCA approach to support the strategic decision-making process , 2009 .

[9]  Gernot Stöglehner,et al.  Ecological footprint — a tool for assessing sustainable energy supplies , 2003 .

[10]  J. Marriott An electricity-focused economic input-output model: Life-cycle assessment and policy implications of future electricity generation scenarios , 2006 .

[11]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  S. Pfister,et al.  Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Ecological footprint accounting in the life cycle assessment of products , 2008 .

[14]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Comparing and Benchmarking the Sustainability Performance of Businesses , 2009 .

[15]  Michael Narodoslawsky,et al.  SPIonExcel—Fast and easy calculation of the Sustainable Process Index via computer , 2007 .

[16]  Troy R. Hawkins,et al.  Hybrid Framework for Managing Uncertainty in Life Cycle Inventories , 2009 .

[17]  M. Lenzen,et al.  Companies on the Scale , 2009 .

[18]  H Scott Matthews,et al.  Categorization of Scope 3 emissions for streamlined enterprise carbon footprinting. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  A review of approaches to treat uncertainty in LCA , 2004 .

[20]  H. S. Matthews,et al.  THE ROLE OF INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS FOR THE SCREENING OF CORPORATE CARBON FOOTPRINTS , 2009 .

[21]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  On the conversion between local and global hectares in Ecological Footprint analysis , 2007 .

[22]  J. Minx,et al.  INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS AND CARBON FOOTPRINTING: AN OVERVIEW OF APPLICATIONS , 2009 .

[23]  J. York Pragmatic Sustainability: Translating Environmental Ethics into Competitive Advantage , 2009 .

[24]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  Five years in the area of input-output and hybrid LCA , 2007 .

[25]  H. S. Matthews,et al.  The importance of carbon footprint estimation boundaries. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  Adrian Henriques,et al.  The triple bottom line, does it all add up? : assessing the sustainability of business and CSR , 2004 .

[27]  Thomas Dyllick,et al.  Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability , 2002 .

[28]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  Generalized Make and Use Framework for Allocation in Life Cycle Assessment , 2010 .

[29]  T. Busch Corporate Carbon Performance Indicators Revisited , 2010 .

[30]  Melissa M. Bilec,et al.  A hybrid life cycle assessment model for *construction processes , 2007 .