Regeneration by coppicing (resprouting) of miombo (African savanna) trees in relation to land use

Abstract This study compared and contrasted natural regeneration by coppicing of tree species in a forest reserve and more disturbed adjacent public lands in eastern Tanzanian miombo woodlands. Data were collected between August and October 1997 using sixty-four 20 m ×50  m plots. Eighty-three percent of the 30 harvested woody species in the forest reserve resprouted after harvesting compared with 90% of the 39 species in the public lands. Coppicing effectiveness (mean number of shoots per stump) varied among species and depended on plant size at the time of cutting, stump height and percentage of the stand removed. Comparing the 16 species effectively sampled in both sites, coppicing effectiveness was 4.9±1.6 (S.E.) shoots per stump in public lands, which is greater than the 3.1±1.4 shoots per stump in the reserve (paired t15=2.433,P=0.014). However, the percentage of resprouting stumps did not differ (paired t15=1.440,P=0.085), but tended to be higher in public lands. The percentages of stumps sprouting per species varied from 0 to 100%, with means of 59 (reserve) and 74% (public lands). Coppicing effectiveness for the most utilised species, Combretum molle (fuelwood; 4.0 shoots per stump in the reserve, 6.1 shoots per stump in public lands), Julbernardia globiflora (fuelwood; 5.6 vs. 5.3 shoots per stump), Pterocarpus angolensis (carpentry; absent vs. 7.3 shoots per stump) and Spirostachys africana (building poles; 1.0 vs. 0.4 shoots per stump) showed typical variation. The greater levels of resprouting in public lands is interpreted as release from self-thinning dynamics, as the reserve has a much higher tree biomass. Despite high levels of harvesting in public lands, tree densities are virtually identical between land uses as a result of the high levels of resprouting. Due to the prolific coppicing of trees in public lands, it is recommended that the woodland should be managed using coppice rotation as a silvicultural system.

[1]  E. Witkowski,et al.  Spatial distribution of soil seed banks of three African savanna woody species at two contrasting sites , 2000, Plant Ecology.

[2]  C. Shackleton.  Stump size and the number of coppice shoots for selected savanna tree species , 2000 .

[3]  J. Mistry.  World Savannas: Ecology and Human Use , 2000 .

[4]  E. Witkowski,et al.  Seed banks, bark thickness and change in age and size structure (1978–1999) of the African savanna tree, Burkea africana , 2003, Plant Ecology.

[5]  E. Witkowski,et al.  Subsistence use of wood products and shifting cultivation within a miombo woodland of eastern Tanzania, with some notes on commercial uses , 2000 .

[6]  E. Witkowski,et al.  Water requirements for germination and early seedling establishment in four African savanna woody plant species , 1998 .

[7]  E. Witkowski,et al.  Harvested and standing wood stocks in protected and communal miombo woodlands of eastern Tanzania , 2002 .

[8]  E. Chidumayo.  Seedling ecology of two miombo woodland trees , 1992, Vegetatio.

[9]  E. Chidumayo,et al.  Miombo Ecology and Management: An Introduction , 1997 .

[10]  I. Grundy,et al.  Regeneration and management of Brachystegia spiciformis Benth. and Julbernardia globiflora (Benth.) Troupin in Miombo woodland, Zimbabwe: towards a sustainable management strategy. , 1995 .

[11]  P. Mushove,et al.  Coppicing ability of colophospermum mopane , 1992 .

[12]  S. B. Boaler,et al.  Ecology of a Miombo Site, Lupa North Forest Reserve, Tanzania: III. Effects on the Vegetation of Local Cultivation Practices , 1966 .

[13]  F. Malaisse.  The Miombo ecosystem , 1978 .

[14]  R. M. Strang.  Some Man-Made Changes in Successional Trends on the Rhodesian Highveld , 1974 .

[15]  B. Campbell.  The miombo in transition: woodlands and welfare in Africa. , 1996 .