Continuous opinion dynamics of multidimensional allocation problems under bounded confidence: More dimensions lead to better chances for consensus

We study multidimensional continuous opinion dynamics, where opinions are nonnegative vectors which components sum up to one. Examples of such opinions are budgets or other allocation vectors which display a distribution of a fixed amount of ressource to n projects. We use the opinion dynamics models of Deffuant-Weisbuch and Hegselmann-Krause, which both extend naturally to more dimensional opinions. They both rely on bounded confidence of the agents and differ in their communication regime. We show detailed simulation results regarding $n=2,...,8$ and the bound of confidence $\eps$. Number, location and size of opinion clusters in the stabilized opinion profiles are of interest. Known differences of both models repeat under higher opinion dimensions: Higher number of clusters and more minor clusters in the Deffuant-Weisbuch model, meta-stable states in the Hegselmann-Krause model. But surprisingly, higher dimensions lead to better chances for a vast majority consensus even for lower bounds of confidence. On the other hand, the number of minority clusters rises with n, too.

[1]  Diemo Urbig,et al.  Attitude Dynamics With Limited Verbalisation Capabilities , 2003, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[2]  E. Ben-Naim,et al.  Bifurcations and patterns in compromise processes , 2002, cond-mat/0212313.

[3]  Jan Lorenz.  Consensus Strikes Back in the Hegselmann-Krause Model of Continuous Opinion Dynamics Under Bounded Confidence , 2006, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[4]  U. Krause.  A DISCRETE NONLINEAR AND NON–AUTONOMOUS MODEL OF CONSENSUS FORMATION , 2007 .

[5]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Mixing beliefs among interacting agents , 2000, Adv. Complex Syst..

[6]  C. Wagner,et al.  Rational Consensus in Science and Society , 1981 .

[7]  Diemo Urbig,et al.  Communication regimes in opinion dynamics: Changing the number of communicating agents , 2007 .

[8]  R. Axelrod.  The Dissemination of Culture , 1997 .

[9]  F. Amblard,et al.  The role of network topology on extremism propagation with the Relative Agreement opinion dynamics , 2004 .

[10]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[11]  Jan Lorenz,et al.  A stabilization theorem for dynamics of continuous opinions , 2005, 0708.2981.

[12]  Jan Lorenz.  Continuous Opinion Dynamics: Insights through Interactive Markov Chains , 2007 .

[13]  V. Latora,et al.  VECTOR OPINION DYNAMICS IN A BOUNDED CONFIDENCE CONSENSUS MODEL , 2005, physics/0504017.

[14]  B. Santos,et al.  Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre: Toward a Redistributive Democracy , 1998 .

[15]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[16]  S. Fortunato.  On The Consensus Threshold For The Opinion Dynamics Of Krause–Hegselmann , 2004, cond-mat/0408648.

[17]  Janke Dittmer.  Consensus formation under bounded confidence , 2001 .

[18]  D. Urbig,et al.  Dynamics of structured attitudes and opinions , 2005 .

[19]  Jan Lorenz.  Designing Participatory Budgeting Mathematics of opinion dynamics and aggregation , 2005 .

[20]  U. Krause,et al.  Opinion Dynamics Driven by Various Ways of Averaging , 2005 .