Design and conduct of clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis : Recommendations from a task force of the Osteoarthritic Research Society

H. Summary H.1. symptom modifying drugs The primary outcome variable is a specific aspect of joint pain, although a ‘signal' symptom or some measure of function may also be studied. Trials of drugs with a rapid onset of effect can be as short as 1–4 weeks but may be as long as 12 weeks. Longer trials (up to 2 years) may be needed to evaluate longer-term toxicity, determine optimal long-term dosing regimens, or establish long-term benefit. Supplemental escape analgesia should be minimized, monitored and discontinued prior to evaluation of efficacy. Some agents that provide symptom relief may not provide benefit until weeks after initiation of therapy. Under these circumstances, trials will vary from 3–12 months in length. If the agent is administered in courses, episodic readministration of the drug may be needed in long-term trials. Longer trials (up to 2 years) may be required to exclude toxicity or establish long-term benefit. H.2. structure modifying drugs These drugs are intended to prevent, retard, stabilize or reverse development of the morphologic changes of OA. Although this has been called ‘chondroprotection', the term is misleading and should be avoided, because all structures of the joint are involved in OA, not articular cartilage alone. The benefits of disease modifying therapy may not be apparent until years after the onset of treatment. The selection of high-risk groups may shorten the time of investigation. Improvement in symptoms (i.e., joint pain) is not a requisite for the efficacy of a drug in this category. In these studies, it may be necessary to permit concomitant use of drugs for relief of symptoms (NSAIDs, analgesics). The confounding effects of glucocorticoids and NSAIDs in these trials is not yet understood and very restricted use of IA depocorticosteroids is recommended. Demonstration of structure modification will require the use of direct measures of joint anatomy, such as radiography, particularly measurement of the radiographic joint space. As stated above, the plain radiograph is presently the most reproducible and readily available method for assessment of disease modification. Studies are needed to validate surrogate markers of disease activity, since they may help shorten Phase 2 structure modifying drug trials. As an alternative to radiography, some trials may utilize arthroscopy. As we approach the beginning of the twenty-first century, concepts of clinical trials of OA drugs are changing. Methodology and techniques for the evaluation of new agents for OA have been refined dramatically over the last decade. We look forward to the future with excitement as we anticipate the development of new agents that may alter the symptoms and course of OA. The above recommendations are intended to help us ascertain which of these new agents are effective.

[1]  Economics of MRI technology , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  M. Dougados,et al.  Knee joint space width measurement: an experimental study of the influence of radiographic procedure and joint positioning. , 1996, British journal of rheumatology.

[3]  M. Hochberg,et al.  New radiographic grading scales for osteoarthritis of the hand. Reliability for determining prevalence and progression. , 1989, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[4]  D W Piraino,et al.  Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities. , 1996, Radiology.

[5]  N. Bellamy Musculoskeletal Clinical Metrology , 1993 .

[6]  M. Lequesne Chondrometry. Quantitative evaluation of joint space width and rate of joint space loss in osteoarthritis of the hip. , 1995, Revue du rhumatisme.

[7]  J. Mcewen,et al.  The development of a subjective health indicator. , 1980, Sociology of health & illness.

[8]  R B Haynes,et al.  Patient compliance and the conduct and interpretation of therapeutic trials. , 1987, Controlled clinical trials.

[9]  A. Poole Immunochemical markers of joint inflammation, skeletal damage and repair: where are we now? , 1994, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[10]  W. Ettinger,et al.  Assessing performance-related disability in patients with knee osteoarthritis. , 1995, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[11]  D. Resnick Diagnosis of Bone and Joint Disorders , 1987 .

[12]  N. Bellamy,et al.  Validation study of WOMAC : a health status instrument for measuring clinically-important patient-relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis , 1988 .

[13]  M Lequesne,et al.  Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis. , 1995, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[14]  H. Caspard,et al.  Validation of an algofunctional index for osteoarthritis of the hand. , 1995, Revue du rhumatisme.

[15]  M. Hochberg,et al.  Quantitative radiography in osteoarthritis: analysis. , 1996, Bailliere's clinical rheumatology.

[16]  T. Spector,et al.  Recommendations for the registration of drugs used in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Group for the respect of ethics and excellence in science (GREES): osteoarthritis section. , 1996, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[17]  C C Glüer,et al.  Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. , 1994, Radiology.

[18]  M Lequesne,et al.  Guidelines for testing slow acting drugs in osteoarthritis. , 1994, The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement.

[19]  M. Nevitt,et al.  The association of radiographic changes of osteoarthritis of the hand and hip in elderly women. , 1995, The Journal of rheumatology.

[20]  R S Balaban,et al.  Quantitative 1H magnetization transfer imaging in vivo , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  E M Braunstein,et al.  Relationship between arthroscopic evidence of cartilage damage and radiographic evidence of joint space narrowing in early osteoarthritis of the knee. , 1991, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[22]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[23]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. , 1988, The Journal of rheumatology.

[24]  D. Burstein,et al.  Diffusion of small solutes in cartilage as measured by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and imaging , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[25]  J. Kellgren,et al.  Radiological Assessment of Osteo-Arthrosis , 1957, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[26]  D. Resnick,et al.  Compartmental evaluation of osteoarthritis of the knee. A comparative study of available diagnostic modalities. , 1975, Radiology.

[27]  M. Dougados,et al.  Arthroscopic evaluation of chondropathy in osteoarthritis of the knee. , 1996, The Journal of rheumatology.

[28]  T. Spector,et al.  Incidence and progression of osteoarthritis in women with unilateral knee disease in the general population: the effect of obesity. , 1994, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[29]  D Resnick,et al.  Abnormalities of articular cartilage in the knee: analysis of available MR techniques. , 1993, Radiology.

[30]  D. Feeny,et al.  A comprehensive multiattribute system for classifying the health status of survivors of childhood cancer. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  M. Dougados,et al.  Radiographic assessment of knee osteoarthritis: reproducibility and sensitivity to change. , 1996, The Journal of rheumatology.

[32]  R M Henkelman,et al.  Effects of collagen orientation on MR imaging characteristics of bovine articular cartilage. , 1993, Radiology.

[33]  P. Brooks,et al.  Clinical, biochemical and imaging methods of assessing osteoarthritis and clinical trials with agents claiming 'chondromodulating' activity. , 1994, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[34]  J J Anderson,et al.  American College of Rheumatology. Preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1995, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[35]  Lohmander Ls,et al.  Articular cartilage and osteoarthrosis. The role of molecular markers to monitor breakdown, repair and disease. , 1994 .

[36]  C. Cooper,et al.  Defining osteoarthritis of the hip for epidemiologic studies. , 1990, American journal of epidemiology.

[37]  R. Moskowitz,et al.  Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. , 1986, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[38]  H. Holman,et al.  Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. , 1980, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[39]  M. Bergner,et al.  The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure , 1981, Medical care.

[40]  A. Williams EuroQol : a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life , 1990 .

[41]  M D Robson,et al.  A combined analysis and magnetic resonance imaging technique for computerised automatic measurement of cartilage thickness in the distal interphalangeal joint. , 1995, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[42]  N. Bellamy Mechanical and Electromechanical Devices , 1993 .

[43]  L. Kazis,et al.  AIMS2. The content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Health Status Questionnaire. , 1992, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[44]  L W Jelinski,et al.  Diffusion and relaxation mapping of cartilage‐bone plugs and excised disks using microscopic magnetic resonance imaging , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[45]  W. Koopman Arthritis and allied conditions;: A textbook of rheumatology , 1972 .

[46]  M. Lequesne,et al.  Indices of severity and disease activity for osteoarthritis. , 1991, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.

[47]  K. Brandt,et al.  Is conventional radiography suitable for evaluation of a disease-modifying drug in patients with knee osteoarthritis? , 1997, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[48]  M. Hochberg,et al.  Degenerative joint disease. , 1983, Clinics in rheumatic diseases.

[49]  K. Gersonde,et al.  MR microimaging of articular cartilage and contrast enhancement by manganese ions , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[50]  J. Lynch,et al.  Precision of joint space width measurement in knee osteoarthritis from digital image analysis of high definition macroradiographs. , 1993, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[51]  G W Torrance,et al.  A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. , 1972, Health services research.

[52]  H K Genant,et al.  MR imaging of the arthritic knee: improved discrimination of cartilage, synovium, and effusion with pulsed saturation transfer and fat-suppressed T1-weighted sequences. , 1994, Radiology.

[53]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[54]  R. Meenan,et al.  Applicability of a health status model to osteoarthritis. , 1989, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[55]  M. Lequesne,et al.  Indexes of severity for osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Validation--value in comparison with other assessment tests. , 1987, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. Supplement.

[56]  E Vignon,et al.  Quantitative assessment of radiographic normal and osteoarthritic hip joint space. , 1995, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[57]  J. B. Kneeland,et al.  Quantification of the volume of articular cartilage in the metacarpophalangeal joints of the hand: accuracy and precision of three-dimensional MR imaging. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[58]  P. Gertman,et al.  Measuring health status in arthritis. The arthritis impact measurement scales. , 1980, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[59]  C Buckland-Wright,et al.  Protocols for precise radio-anatomical positioning of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral compartments of the knee. , 1995, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[60]  P A Dieppe,et al.  Recommended methodology for assessing the progression of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee joints. , 1995, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[61]  P. Neyret,et al.  Partial meniscectomy and anterior cruciate ligament rupture in soccer players , 1993, The American journal of sports medicine.

[62]  H. Roos,et al.  The Prevalence of Gonarthrosis and Its Relation to Meniscectomy in Former Soccer Players , 1994, The American journal of sports medicine.

[63]  Michael Drummond,et al.  Principles of economic appraisal in health care , 1980 .

[64]  E. Thonar,et al.  Serum hyaluronic acid level as a predictor of disease progression in osteoarthritis of the knee. , 1995, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[65]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future phase III clinical trials in knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis. Consensus development at OMERACT III. , 1997, The Journal of rheumatology.

[66]  P. Dieppe,et al.  Relationship between serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein levels and disease progression in osteoarthritis of the knee joint. , 1995, British journal of rheumatology.

[67]  J. Lynch,et al.  Joint space width measures cartilage thickness in osteoarthritis of the knee: high resolution plain film and double contrast macroradiographic investigation. , 1995, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[68]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. , 1945 .

[69]  G. Ehrlich Treatment decisions, side-effect liability and cost-effectiveness in osteoarthritis , 1996 .

[70]  D G Disler,et al.  Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[71]  J C Buckland-Wright,et al.  Accuracy and precision of joint space width measurements in standard and macroradiographs of osteoarthritic knees. , 1995, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[72]  L. Lohmander,et al.  Aggrecan degradation in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. , 1995, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[73]  G. Stucki,et al.  Parametric and non-parametric measures in the assessment of knee and hip osteoarthritis: interobserver reliability and correlation with radiology. , 1996, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage.

[74]  Jh. Kellgren Radiological assessment of osteoarthritis , 1957 .

[75]  J. Hollander ARTHRITIS AND ALLIED CONDITIONS , 1949 .

[76]  E. Maheu,et al.  Therapeutic trials in digital osteoarthritis. A critical review. , 1995, Revue du rhumatisme.

[77]  M. Hochberg,et al.  Clinical trials. A guide to understanding methodology and interpreting results. , 1990, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[78]  George W. Torrance,et al.  Social preferences for health states: An empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques , 1976 .

[79]  H. Brown,et al.  Validity of Euroqol--a generic health status instrument--in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Economic and Health Outcomes Research Group. , 1994, British journal of rheumatology.

[80]  W. Murphy,et al.  The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hand. , 1990, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[81]  J. Reginster,et al.  Rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases and impaired quality of life: a challenge for rheumatologists. , 1996, The Journal of rheumatology.

[82]  H K Genant,et al.  Emerging applications of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of articular cartilage. , 1996, Radiologic clinics of North America.