Control of vergence: Gating among disparity inputs by voluntary target selection

SummaryThe ability of human beings to shift their vergence between multiple disparity stimuli was investigated. The stimulus was a stereogram consisting of a single bar (1× 0.3°) projected in the center of a larger circular pattern (28° dia) of dots (0.3° dia). In the initial condition, the subjects perceived a single bar in the center of a cluster of dots, all lying in a single depth plane. The subjects were instructed to fixate either the bar or one of the dots close to the bar. Stepwise changes of target-vergence of either the bar, or of all dots, or of both configurations in opposite directions, were imposed in a random sequence. Under these conditions, ocular vergence was controlled by the target-vergence of the selected target at all times, even if this implied a loss of binocular fusion for the non-selected target. The effect of target selection per se, without concomitant changes in retinal position of the selected target, was studied in two experienced subjects with stabilized image techniques. The subjects viewed a configuration containing short vertical bars placed at either side of a long vertical bar. The short bars on different sides of the long bar had opposite (crossed or uncrossed) disparities. After stabilization of the configuration while the subject fixated the long bar, subjects attempted to fixate the short bars alternatingly. Due to the stabilization the ensuing eye movements did not affect the retinal positions, and thus the disparity, of the bars. Attempted fixation of a para-foveally viewed, short bar induced vergence responses in the appropriate direction. These vergence responses would have reduced disparity of the selected target if this had not been stabilized, at the expense of increasing disparity of non-selected targets. From this result we conclude that, by the mechanism of target selection, disparity information of the selected target is gated to a subsystem processing disparity which controls vergence.

[1]  B. L. Zuber,et al.  Models of oculomotor behavior and control , 1981 .

[2]  D. R. Hampton,et al.  Fusional vergence response to local peripheral stimulation. , 1983, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[3]  A. Fuchs,et al.  Further properties of the human saccadic system: eye movements and correction saccades with and without visual fixation points. , 1969, Vision research.

[4]  Hermann M. Burian,et al.  FUSIONAL MOVEMENTS: ROLE OF PERIPHERAL RETINAL STIMULI , 1939 .

[5]  Walter Levitsky,et al.  Eye Tracking of Observer-Generated Target Movements , 2005 .

[6]  P ELLEN,et al.  A quantitative analysis of the horizontal movements of the eyes in the experiment of Johannes Mueller. II. Effect of variation in target separation. , 1956, American journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Precise recording of human eye movements , 1975, Vision Research.

[8]  H Collewijn,et al.  Ocular vergence under natural conditions. II. Gaze shifts between real targets differing in distance and direction , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[9]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Disjunctive eye movements , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  A E Kertesz,et al.  Effect of stimulus size on fusion and vergence. , 1981, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[11]  P ELLEN,et al.  A quantitative analysis of the horizontal movements of the eyes in the experiment of Johannes Mueller. I. Method and results. , 1956, American journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  O. Grüsser,et al.  The effect of gaze motor signals and spatially directed attention on eye movements and visual perception. , 1986, Progress in brain research.

[13]  D Regan,et al.  Human ocular vergence movements induced by changing size and disparity. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  D. Robinson,et al.  A METHOD OF MEASURING EYE MOVEMENT USING A SCLERAL SEARCH COIL IN A MAGNETIC FIELD. , 1963, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[15]  M J Steinbach,et al.  Eye Tracking of Observer-Generated Target Movements , 1968, Science.

[16]  C. J. Erkelens,et al.  Adaptation of ocular vergence to stimulation with large disparities , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  G WESTHEIMER,et al.  Eye movement responses to convergence stimuli. , 1956, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[18]  R Täumer,et al.  Investigations of the eye tracking system through stabilized retinal images. , 1972, Bibliotheca ophthalmologica : supplementa ad ophthalmologica.

[19]  D Regan,et al.  Visual field defects for vergence eye movements and for stereomotion perception. , 1986, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  H Collewijn,et al.  Ocular vergence under natural conditions. I. Continuous changes of target distance along the median plane , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.