Spatiotemporal relations and movement trajectories in visuomotor synchronization

This work investigates how spatial and temporal aspects of rhythmic movements are affected by spatial and temporal components of a visual pacing sequence. Participants synchronized finger taps with three visual pacing sequences ( Flash , High Finger , and Low Finger ) at two tempi (500 ms and 400 ms interonset interval). The Flash sequence contained only temporal information, whereas the two Finger sequences contained apparent motion of different amplitudes. Participants9 finger movements were recorded with a motion capture system, and movement trajectories and timing accuracy were analyzed. Results indicated that apparent motion facilitates visuomotor synchronization accuracy, which likely stems from tight perception-action links. Stimulus amplitude modulated tap amplitudes in the same direction, but this spatial assimilation did not adversely affect timing accuracy. Flexion times toward the target were significantly shorter than extension or dwell times, and could indicate a relatively ballistic movement trajectory. Local deviations of tap timing correlated with the movement trajectories from the preceding and following movement cycle. For example, after a late tap, the following movement cycle had lower amplitude and shorter extension and dwell times. This could signify the workings of error correction mechanisms that ensure stable synchronization.

[1]  R N Shepard,et al.  Path-guided apparent motion. , 1983, Science.

[2]  J. Freyd,et al.  Apparent Motion of the Human Body , 1990 .

[3]  H. Haken,et al.  A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[4]  Aniruddh D. Patel,et al.  Spectral decomposition of variability in synchronization and continuation tapping: comparisons between auditory and visual pacing and feedback conditions. , 2002, Human movement science.

[5]  Carol L. Krumhansl,et al.  Compatible motion facilitates visuomotor synchronization , 2009 .

[6]  Alan M Wing,et al.  Timing and trajectory in rhythm production. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Caroline Palmer,et al.  Cognitive and biomechanical influences in pianists’ finger tapping , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  A. Kristofferson,et al.  Response delays and the timing of discrete motor responses , 1973 .

[9]  E. Saltzman,et al.  Steady-state and perturbed rhythmical movements: a dynamical analysis. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Caroline Palmer,et al.  Movement amplitude and tempo change in piano performance , 2004 .

[11]  Jane W. Davidson,et al.  Movement and collaboration in musical performance , 2008 .

[12]  David Whitney,et al.  The influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to a stationary object , 2003, Nature.

[13]  P. Burt,et al.  Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion. , 1981, Psychological review.

[14]  B. Repp,et al.  Rhythmic movement is attracted more strongly to auditory than to visual rhythms , 2004, Psychological research.

[15]  W. Helsen,et al.  A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Caroline Palmer,et al.  Subdividing the Beat: Auditory and Motor Contributions to Synchronization , 2009 .

[17]  C. Palmer,et al.  Synchronization of Timing and Motion 435 , 2022 .

[18]  Ramesh Balasubramaniam,et al.  Two different processes for sensorimotor synchronization in continuous and discontinuous rhythmic movements , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  E. Saltzman,et al.  Space-time behavior of single and bimanual rhythmical movements: data and limit cycle model. , 1987 .

[20]  Philipp Berens,et al.  CircStat: AMATLABToolbox for Circular Statistics , 2009, Journal of Statistical Software.

[21]  Caroline Palmer,et al.  Tactile feedback and timing accuracy in piano performance , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  W. Singer,et al.  The constructive nature of vision: direct evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of apparent motion and motion imagery , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.

[23]  J. Sloboda,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Cues for Visually Mediated Synchronization , 2009 .

[24]  Ramesh Balasubramaniam,et al.  Trajectory Formation in Timed Repetitive Movements , 2006 .

[25]  Michael J. Hove,et al.  It's all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation , 2009 .

[26]  D. Elliott,et al.  Movement Trajectories in the Presence of a Distracting Stimulus: Evidence for a Response Activation Model of Selective Reaching , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[27]  D J Weeks,et al.  Stimulus-response compatability for moving stimuli: perception of affordances or directional coding? , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective Reaching to Grasp: Evidence for Distractor Interference Effects , 1997 .

[29]  J. Kelso,et al.  Action-Perception as a Pattern Formation Process , 2018, Attention and Performance XIII.

[30]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[31]  Alan M. Wing,et al.  Modeling variability and dependence in timing , 1996 .

[32]  K. Torre,et al.  Time intervals production in tapping and oscillatory motion. , 2004, Human movement science.

[33]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. , 1970, Psychological review.

[34]  Robert Sessions Woodworth,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT , 1899 .

[35]  M. Posner,et al.  Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance. , 1976, Psychological review.

[36]  Petri Toiviainen,et al.  Perception of Expression in Conductors' Gestures: A Continuous Response Study , 2010 .

[37]  G. Knoblich,et al.  The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  Warren Haston Teacher Modeling as an Effective Teaching Strategy , 2007 .

[39]  C F Michaels,et al.  S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: evidence of the detection of affordances. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[41]  G. Aschersleben Temporal Control of Movements in Sensorimotor Synchronization , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[42]  A Semjen,et al.  Timing precision in continuation and synchronization tapping , 2000, Psychological research.

[43]  P A Kolers,et al.  Rhythms and responses. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  B. Repp Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[45]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  Keeping with the beat: movement trajectories contribute to movement timing , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[46]  Caroline Palmer,et al.  Movement-Related Feedback and Temporal Accuracy in Clarinet Performance , 2009 .

[47]  W. Prinz,et al.  Acting while perceiving: assimilation precedes contrast , 2008, Psychological research.

[48]  B H Repp,et al.  Phase correction, phase resetting, and phase shifts after subliminal timing perturbations in sensorimotor synchronization. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  Bruno H Repp,et al.  Rate Limits in Sensorimotor Synchronization With Auditory and Visual Sequences: The Synchronization Threshold and the Benefits and Costs of Interval Subdivision , 2003, Journal of motor behavior.

[50]  Sergei Gepshtein,et al.  The lawful perception of apparent motion. , 2007, Journal of vision.