Shared challenge for learning: dialogue between management and front-line workers in knowledge management

Knowledge management is increasingly involved in the creation of new collective competencies. This calls for a new form of collaborative learning activity and dialogue between management's and front-line workers' perspectives. Competence Laboratory is a new team-level knowledge management method aiming at promoting and supporting such learning and dialogue. The article describes the method, its theoretical foundations on the concepts of Cultural-Historical Activity Theory and the experimental use of the method in a telecommunications company. The analysis of the experiment focuses on the conditions for constructing a shared view of the pivotal challenge of learning and competence development between middle management and front-line workers.

[1]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Interactive expertise : studies in distributed working intelligence , 1992 .

[2]  Y. Engeström,et al.  The change laboratory as a tool for transforming work , 1996 .

[3]  Robert A. Burgelman Managing corporate entrepreneurship: New structures for implementing technological innovation , 1985 .

[4]  Ashish Nanda,et al.  Resources, Capabilities and Competencies , 1996 .

[5]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Strategy Formation in an Adhocracy. , 1985 .

[6]  Andrew C. Boynton,et al.  The Effective Design of Work Under Total Quality Management , 2000 .

[7]  Robert A. Burgelman Robert A. BURGELMAN & Leonard R. SAYLES (1986), Inside Corporate Innovation: Strategy, Structure and Managerial Skills , 1985 .

[8]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice , 1999 .

[9]  Henry Mintzberg The rise and fall of strategic planning , 1993 .

[10]  Don Tapscott,et al.  The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence , 2003 .

[11]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[12]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[13]  Rodrigo Magalhaes Organizational Knowledge and Learning , 1998 .

[14]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[15]  Seth Chaiklin,et al.  Activity Theory and Social Practice , 1999 .

[16]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[17]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Behind the learning curve: a sketch of the learning process , 1991 .

[18]  E. Penrose The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[19]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice , 1995 .