Simultaneous EEG and MEG recordings reveal vocal pitch elicited cortical gamma oscillations in young and older adults

The frequency-following response with origin in the auditory brainstem represents the pitch contour of voice and can be recorded with electrodes from the scalp. MEG studies also revealed a cortical contribution to the high gamma oscillations at the fundamental frequency (f0) of a vowel stimulus. Therefore, studying the cortical component of the frequency-following response could provide insights into how pitch information is encoded at the cortical level. Comparing how aging affects the different responses may help to uncover the neural mechanisms underlying speech understanding deficits in older age. We simultaneously recorded EEG and MEG responses to the syllable/ba/. MEG beamformer analysis localized sources in bilateral auditory cortices and the midbrain. Time-frequency analysis showed a faithful representation of the pitch contour between 106 Hz and 138 Hz in the cortical activity. A cross-correlation revealed a latency of 20 ms. Furthermore, stimulus onsets elicited cortical 40-Hz responses. Both the 40-Hz and the f0 response amplitudes increased in older age and were larger in the right hemisphere. The effects of aging and laterality of the f0 response were evident in the MEG only, suggesting that both effects were characteristics of the cortical response. After comparing f0 and N1 responses in EEG and MEG, we estimated that approximately one-third of the scalp-recorded f0 response could be cortical in origin. We attributed the significance of the cortical f0 response to the precise timing of cortical neurons that serve as a time-sensitive code for pitch.

[1]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Brainstorm: A User-Friendly Application for MEG/EEG Analysis , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[2]  Bernhard Ross,et al.  The Neurotopography of Vowels as Mirrored by Evoked Magnetic Field Measurements , 1996, Brain and Language.

[3]  D. T. Ives,et al.  Age-Related Difference in Melodic Pitch Perception Is Probably Mediated by Temporal Processing: Empirical and Computational Evidence , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[4]  C D Tesche,et al.  Signal-space projections of MEG data characterize both distributed and well-localized neuronal sources. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  Xiaoqin Wang,et al.  Temporal and rate representations of time-varying signals in the auditory cortex of awake primates , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  Direct Recordings of Pitch Responses from Human Auditory Cortex , 2010, Current Biology.

[7]  Huichao Yang,et al.  Enhanced Gamma Activity and Cross-Frequency Interaction of Resting-State Electroencephalographic Oscillations in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease , 2017, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[8]  Kathy R Vander Werff,et al.  Brain Stem Responses to Speech in Younger and Older Adults , 2011, Ear and hearing.

[9]  A. Krishnan,et al.  Neural encoding in the human brainstem relevant to the pitch of complex tones , 2011, Hearing Research.

[10]  A Wingfield,et al.  Prosodic features and the intelligibility of accelerated speech: syntactic versus periodic segmentation. , 1984, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  J. Syka,et al.  Metabolic changes in the auditory cortex in presbycusis demonstrated by MR spectroscopy , 2013, Experimental Gerontology.

[12]  Title: Afferent Inputs to Cortical Fast-spiking Interneurons Organize Pyramidal Cell Network 1 Oscillations at High-gamma Frequencies (60 – 200 Hz). 2 3 Author Names and Affiliations: 4 , 2014 .

[13]  J. Vrba,et al.  Signal processing in magnetoencephalography. , 2001, Methods.

[14]  M. Scherg,et al.  Intracerebral Sources of Human Auditory Steady-State Responses , 2004, Brain Topography.

[15]  Anja Roye,et al.  Effects of age-related hearing loss and background noise on neuromagnetic activity from auditory cortex , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[16]  M. Howard,et al.  Invasive recordings in the human auditory cortex. , 2015, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[17]  Yisheng Xu,et al.  Human frequency-following response: representation of pitch contours in Chinese tones , 2004, Hearing Research.

[18]  T. Griffiths,et al.  Functional Imaging of Pitch Analysis , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Robert D Frisina,et al.  Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: relations to possible neural mechanisms , 1997, Hearing Research.

[20]  Q. Summerfield,et al.  Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with different fundamental frequencies. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer , 1980 .

[22]  R. Zatorre Neural Specializations for Tonal Processing , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[23]  André M Marcoux,et al.  Brainstem Auditory Responses to Resolved and Unresolved Harmonics of a Synthetic Vowel in Quiet and Noise , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[24]  A. Krishnan,et al.  The role of the auditory brainstem in processing linguistically-relevant pitch patterns , 2009, Brain and Language.

[25]  R. Chambers,et al.  Effects of age on the adult auditory middle latency response , 1991, Hearing Research.

[26]  Nicole M. Russo,et al.  Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Prefrontal cortex gating of auditory transmission in humans , 1989, Brain Research.

[28]  Claude Alain,et al.  Musical Training Orchestrates Coordinated Neuroplasticity in Auditory Brainstem and Cortex to Counteract Age-Related Declines in Categorical Vowel Perception , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Clifford Qualls,et al.  Age-related effects on superior temporal gyrus activity during an auditory oddball task , 2005, Neuroreport.

[30]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  P. Moberg,et al.  Effects of age and age-related differences in auditory information processing on fluid and crystallized intelligence , 1990 .

[32]  N. Kraus,et al.  Aging Affects Neural Precision of Speech Encoding , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  David Poeppel,et al.  Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  Sustained Magnetic Fields Reveal Separate Sites for Sound Level and Temporal Regularity in Human Auditory Cortex , 2002, NeuroImage.

[35]  Iiro P. Jääskeläinen,et al.  Aging and Cholinergic Modulation of the Transient Magnetic 40-Hz Auditory Response , 2002, NeuroImage.

[36]  G. Bidelman Multichannel recordings of the human brainstem frequency-following response: Scalp topography, source generators, and distinctions from the transient ABR , 2015, Hearing Research.

[37]  J. Simon,et al.  Evidence of degraded representation of speech in noise, in the aging midbrain and cortex. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  Sylvain Baillet,et al.  Cortical contributions to the auditory frequency-following response revealed by MEG , 2016, Nature Communications.

[39]  Roy D Patterson,et al.  The interaction of glottal-pulse rate and vocal-tract length in judgements of speaker size, sex, and age. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  K. Nakashima,et al.  Aging effects on auditory middle latency responses. , 1995, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[41]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[42]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Processing of vowels in supratemporal auditory cortex , 1997, Neuroscience Letters.

[43]  N. Kraus,et al.  Training to improve hearing speech in noise: biological mechanisms. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  Jessica A. Cardin,et al.  Driving fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm and controls sensory responses , 2009, Nature.

[45]  H. Damasio,et al.  Auditory perception of temporal and spectral events in patients with focal left and right cerebral lesions , 1990, Brain and Language.

[46]  Bruce A. Schneider,et al.  Age-Related Changes in Temporal Processing: Implications for Speech Perception , 2001 .

[47]  Werner Lutzenberger,et al.  Hemispheric lateralization of the processing of consonant-vowel syllables (formant transitions): effects of stimulus characteristics and attentional demands on evoked magnetic fields , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  C Pantev,et al.  A high-precision magnetoencephalographic study of human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  Robert S Schlauch,et al.  The effect of fundamental frequency on the intelligibility of speech with flattened intonation contours. , 2008, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[50]  D. Cheyne,et al.  Spatiotemporal mapping of cortical activity accompanying voluntary movements using an event‐related beamforming approach , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[51]  Elena Amenedo,et al.  Effects of aging on middle-latency auditory evoked potentials: A cross-sectional study , 1998, Biological Psychiatry.

[52]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  Jyrki Ahveninen,et al.  Enhanced magnetic auditory steady-state response in early Alzheimer’s disease , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[54]  W. J. Riedel,et al.  40-Hz steady state response in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment , 2011, Neurobiology of Aging.

[55]  N. Kraus,et al.  The auditory brainstem is a barometer of rapid auditory learning , 2013, Neuroscience.

[56]  Bryce E. Pasko,et al.  Somatosensory timing deficits in schizophrenia , 2013, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[57]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Mechanisms of gamma oscillations. , 2012, Annual review of neuroscience.

[58]  R. Helfert,et al.  Central auditory aging: GABA changes in the inferior colliculus , 1995, Experimental Gerontology.

[59]  Peter Q. Pfordresher,et al.  Native Experience with a Tone Language Enhances Pitch Discrimination and the Timing of Neural Responses to Pitch Change , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[60]  Ferdinando Grandori,et al.  Field analysis of auditory evoked brainstem potentials , 1986, Hearing Research.

[61]  L. Hughes,et al.  Inhibitory neurotransmission, plasticity and aging in the mammalian central auditory system , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[62]  L. Hughes,et al.  Age-Related Changes in the Inhibitory Response Properties of Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus Output Neurons: Role of Inhibitory Inputs , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  Alain de Cheveigné Vowel-specific effects in concurrent vowel identification. , 1999 .

[64]  J. Eggermont Between sound and perception: reviewing the search for a neural code , 2001, Hearing Research.

[65]  P. Cariani,et al.  Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[66]  Koji Inui,et al.  Auditory sustained field responses to periodic noise , 2012, BMC Neuroscience.

[67]  G. Weismer,et al.  The effects of a flattened fundamental frequency on intelligibility at the sentence level. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[68]  Terence W. Picton,et al.  Envelope and spectral frequency-following responses to vowel sounds , 2008, Hearing Research.

[69]  Gavin M. Bidelman,et al.  Subcortical sources dominate the neuroelectric auditory frequency-following response to speech , 2018, NeuroImage.

[70]  R. Mitchell,et al.  Age-related decline in emotional prosody discrimination: acoustic correlates. , 2014, Experimental psychology.

[71]  Claude Alain,et al.  Age-related changes in the subcortical–cortical encoding and categorical perception of speech , 2014, Neurobiology of Aging.

[72]  J. Mills,et al.  The frequency-modulation following response in young and aged human subjects , 2002, Hearing Research.

[73]  N. Crone,et al.  Afferent inputs to cortical fast-spiking interneurons organize pyramidal cell network oscillations at high-gamma frequencies (60-200 Hz). , 2014, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[74]  M Steinschneider,et al.  Complex tone processing in primary auditory cortex of the awake monkey. II. Pitch versus critical band representation. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[75]  Erika Skoe,et al.  Neural Processing of Speech Sounds in ASD and First-Degree Relatives , 2010, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

[76]  P. Tallal,et al.  Neurobiology of speech perception. , 1997, Annual review of neuroscience.

[77]  M. Scherg,et al.  Structural and functional asymmetry of lateral Heschl's gyrus reflects pitch perception preference , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[78]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Task-induced asymmetry of the auditory evoked M100 neuromagnetic field elicited by speech sounds. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[79]  N. Kraus,et al.  The scalp-recorded brainstem response to speech: neural origins and plasticity. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[80]  Kate Dupuis,et al.  Use of affective prosody by young and older adults. , 2010, Psychology and aging.

[81]  J. Fritz,et al.  Dynamics of Precise Spike Timing in Primary Auditory Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[82]  C Pantev,et al.  Magnetic and electric brain activity evoked by the processing of tone and vowel stimuli , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[83]  B. Ross,et al.  Plasticity in neuromagnetic cortical responses suggests enhanced auditory object representation , 2013, BMC Neuroscience.

[84]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Benzodiazepine temazepam suppresses the transient auditory 40-Hz response amplitude in humans , 1999, Neuroscience Letters.

[85]  S. Scott,et al.  The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[86]  Alessandro Presacco,et al.  Effects of Aging on the Encoding of Dynamic and Static Components of Speech , 2015, Ear and hearing.

[87]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Age‐related functional differences between auditory cortices: a whole- head MEG study , 1995, Neuroreport.

[88]  C Pantev,et al.  Right hemispheric laterality of human 40 Hz auditory steady-state responses. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[89]  J. Vrba Magnetoencephalography: the art of finding a needle in a haystack , 2002 .

[90]  Alan R Palmer,et al.  Phase-locked responses to pure tones in the primary auditory cortex , 2002, Hearing Research.

[91]  Arjan Hillebrand,et al.  Beamformer analysis of MEG data. , 2005, International review of neurobiology.

[92]  R. West,et al.  An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[93]  Mitchell Steinschneider,et al.  Coding of repetitive transients by auditory cortex on Heschl's gyrus. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[94]  D. Abrams,et al.  Population responses in primary auditory cortex simultaneously represent the temporal envelope and periodicity features in natural speech , 2017, Hearing Research.

[95]  Xiaohu Yang,et al.  Aging Effect on Categorical Perception of Mandarin Tones 2 and 3 and Thresholds of Pitch Contour Discrimination. , 2017, American journal of audiology.

[96]  R. Knight,et al.  Prefrontal deficits in attention and inhibitory control with aging. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[97]  M Steinschneider,et al.  Complex tone processing in primary auditory cortex of the awake monkey. I. Neural ensemble correlates of roughness. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[98]  D. Woods,et al.  Age-related changes in processing auditory stimuli during visual attention: evidence for deficits in inhibitory control and sensory memory. , 1999, Psychology and aging.

[99]  Ananthanarayan Krishnan,et al.  Human frequency-following responses: representation of steady-state synthetic vowels , 2002, Hearing Research.

[100]  Gareth R. Barnes,et al.  Gamma band pitch responses in human auditory cortex measured with magnetoencephalography , 2012, NeuroImage.

[101]  S. Kuriki,et al.  Principal component elimination method for the improvement of S/N in evoked neuromagnetic field measurements , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[102]  B. Ross,et al.  Stimulus experience modifies auditory neuromagnetic responses in young and older listeners , 2009, Hearing Research.

[103]  Yu He,et al.  Hearing Two Things at Once: Neurophysiological Indices of Speech Segregation and Identification , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[104]  N. Kraus,et al.  Subcortical encoding of sound is enhanced in bilinguals and relates to executive function advantages , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[105]  Josef Syka,et al.  Age-related changes in GAD levels in the central auditory system of the rat , 2009, Experimental Gerontology.

[106]  D L Woods,et al.  Lesions of frontal cortex diminish the auditory mismatch negativity. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[107]  Terence W Picton,et al.  Human temporal auditory acuity as assessed by envelope following responses. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[108]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Enhancement of MR Images Using Registration for Signal Averaging , 1998, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography.

[109]  D. Woods,et al.  Age-related changes in human middle latency auditory evoked potentials. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[110]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Cortical sensitivity to periodicity of speech sounds. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.