An Examination of the Cross-Cultural Validity of a Multidimensional Model of Commitment in Europe

This study examined the validity of a multidimensional model of employee commitment in Europe. The study was conducted using a sample of employees working for the translation department of the European Commission, located in Brussels. The survey questionnaire included measures of affective and normative commitment to the organization, the occupation, the work group, and Europe; continuance commitment to the organization and the occupation; and intent to quit. Participants (N = 580) pertained to 12 European nationalities and responded to a French or an English version of the questionnaire. Results showed that (a) for normative and continuance commitment, the organizational and occupational foci were not empirically distinguishable and that (b) both the commitment model and the relationships between commitment components and intent to quit were culturally invariant. On the other hand, evidence also emphasized the importance of considering multiple commitment components in predicting intent to quit. The implications of these findings are discussed.

[1]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[2]  Arnon E. Reichers,et al.  Conflict and organizational commitments. , 1986 .

[3]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[4]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[5]  R. Sitgreaves Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[6]  K. Widaman Hierarchically Nested Covariance Structure Models for Multitrait-Multimethod Data , 1985 .

[7]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  Further evidence for the discriminant validity of measures of organizational commitment, job involvement, and job satisfaction. , 1991 .

[8]  Z. Aycan Cross-Cultural Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2000 .

[9]  Alex Inkeles,et al.  Participant Citizenship in Six Developing Countries , 1969 .

[10]  B. Bhatt,et al.  Work, Mobility, and Participation: A Comparative Study of American and Japanese Industry , 1980 .

[11]  Nancy G. Dodd,et al.  RESEARCH NOTES ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT: A COMPARISON OF AMERICAN, JAPANESE, AND KOREAN EMPLOYEES , 1985 .

[12]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[13]  N. Adler,et al.  The Parochial Dinosaur: Organizational Science in a Global Context , 1991 .

[14]  Ellen M. Whitener,et al.  Exchange Theory Determinants of Affective and Continuance Commitment and Turnover , 1993 .

[15]  Robert M. Marsh,et al.  Organizational Commitment and Turnover: A Prediction Study. , 1977 .

[16]  B. Meglino,et al.  The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: An exami , 1994 .

[17]  H. Tajfel Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[18]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Career-oriented versus team-oriented commitment and behavior at work , 1998 .

[19]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Practical Issues in Structural Modeling , 1987 .

[20]  L. Tucker,et al.  A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis , 1973 .

[21]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. , 1974 .

[22]  H. Marsh,et al.  Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. , 1985 .

[23]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. , 1990 .

[24]  Paul J. Kobulnicky,et al.  Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research and application , 1998 .

[25]  M. Riggs,et al.  Development and Validation of Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy Scales for Job-Related Applications , 1994 .

[26]  M. R. Baker,et al.  Interpersonal Attachment and Organizational Commitment: Subgroup Hypothesis Revisited , 1994 .

[27]  A. Gouldner THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[28]  Maddy Janssens,et al.  A paradigm for confirmatory cross-cultural research in organizational-behavior , 1995 .

[29]  E. Lawler Affective Attachments to Nested Groups: A Choice-Process Theory , 1992 .

[30]  Thomas E. Becker Foci and Bases of Commitment: Are They Distinctions Worth Making? , 1992 .

[31]  Hal B. Gregersen,et al.  Multiple Commitments Upon Repatriation: The Japanese Experience , 1996 .

[32]  G. Bohrnstedt,et al.  Social Measurement: Current Issues , 1981 .

[33]  R. Hackett,et al.  Further assessments of Meyer and Allen's (1991) three-component model of organizational commitment. , 1994 .

[34]  T. Besser The Commitment of Japanese Workers and U.S. Workers: A Reassessment of the Literature , 1993 .

[35]  Stephen J. Jaros,et al.  An Assessment of Meyer and Allen's (1991) Three-Component Model of Organizational Commitment and Turnover Intentions , 1997 .

[36]  J. Mathieu A cross-level nonrecursive model of the antecedents of organizational commitment and satisfaction. , 1991 .

[37]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  LOYAL FROM DAY ONE: BIODATA, ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION, AND TURNOVER AMONG NEWCOMERS , 1995 .

[38]  S. Zaccaro,et al.  Contrasting group and organizational commitment: Evidence for differences among multilevel attachments , 1989 .

[39]  Aaron Buchko,et al.  Effects of Cultural Context on the Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences of Organizational Commitment: A Study of Russian Workers , 1998 .

[40]  Daniel M. Eveleth,et al.  Foci And Bases Of Employee Commitment: Implications For Job Performance , 1996 .

[41]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self‐esteem , 1994 .

[42]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. , 1990 .

[43]  J. Harrison,et al.  Antecedents to Organizational Commitment Among Mexican Employees of a U.S. Firm in Mexico , 1998 .

[44]  Arnon E. Reichers,et al.  A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. , 1985, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[45]  H. Becker Notes on the Concept of Commitment , 1960, American Journal of Sociology.

[46]  Robert J. Vandenberg,et al.  Assessing newcomers' changing commitments to the organization during the first 6 months of work , 1993 .

[47]  S. Hunt,et al.  Organizational Commitment: One of Many Commitments or Key Mediating Construct? , 1994 .

[48]  Thomas E. Becker,et al.  Profiles of commitment: An empirical test , 1993 .

[49]  Assessing organisational commitment in a Belgian context: Evidence for the three-dimensional model , 1996 .

[50]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Identifying Organizational Identification , 1992 .

[51]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[52]  John P. Meyer,et al.  The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization , 1990 .

[53]  J. Mathieu,et al.  A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment , 1990 .

[54]  Steve Hinkle,et al.  Psychological Attachment to the Group: Cross-Cultural Differences in Organizational Identification and Subjective Norms as Predictors of Workers' Turnover Intentions , 1998 .

[55]  Randall B. Dunham,et al.  Organizational commitment: The utility of an integrative definition. , 1994 .

[56]  Paula C. Morrow,et al.  The theory and measurement of work commitment , 1993 .

[57]  Arne L. Kalleberg,et al.  Work Organization and Workforce Commitment: A Study of Plants and Employees in the U.S. and Japan , 1985 .

[58]  Michael A. West,et al.  Handbook of Work Group Psychology , 1996 .

[59]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language , 1993 .

[60]  Nancy G. Dodd,et al.  Organizational Commitment: A Comparison of American, Japanese, and Korean Employees , 1985 .

[61]  P. Hom,et al.  Structural equations modeling test of a turnover theory: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. , 1991 .

[62]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[63]  C. Pearson,et al.  Contributions of job content and social information on organizational commitment and job satisfaction: An exploration in a Malaysian nursing context , 1997 .

[64]  Arne L. Kalleberg,et al.  Culture, Control and Commitment: A Study of Work Organization and Work Attitudes in the United States and Japan. , 1990 .

[65]  Rodger W. Griffeth,et al.  Managing in the International Context: Testing Cultural Generality of Sources of Commitment to Multinational Enterprises , 1995 .

[66]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1991 .

[67]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. , 1993 .

[68]  John M. Jermier,et al.  Effects of Continuance, Affective, and Moral Commitment on the Withdrawal Process: an Evaluation of Eight Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[69]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  A Review of Current Practices for Evaluating Causal Models in Organizational Behavior and Human Resources Management Research , 1994 .

[70]  Donna M. Randall,et al.  Cross-cultural research on organizational commitment: A review and application of Hofstede's Value Survey Module , 1993 .

[71]  Robert J. Vandenberg,et al.  A Central Question in Cross-Cultural Research: Do Employees of Different Cultures Interpret Work-related Measures in an Equivalent Manner?: , 1994 .

[72]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Being different or being better? National stereotypes and identifications of Polish and Dutch students , 1996 .

[73]  Carmen Huici,et al.  Comparative identity and evaluation of socio‐political change: Perceptions of the European Community as a function of the salience of regional identities , 1997 .

[74]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: An Examination of Construct Validity , 1996, Journal of vocational behavior.

[75]  Daniel W. Russell,et al.  Discriminant validation of measures of job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment. , 1988 .

[76]  John P. Meyer,et al.  A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment , 1991 .

[77]  Fred Luthans,et al.  Organizational Commitment Across Cultures: The Impact of Antecedents on Korean Employees , 1996 .

[78]  Validity Evidence for the Organizational Commitment Questionnaire in the Japanese Corporate Culture , 1995 .

[79]  Charles W. Mueller,et al.  Assessment of Meyer and Allen's three-component model of organizational Commitment in South Korea , 1997 .

[80]  M. Rahim,et al.  Confirmatory factor analysis of the styles of handling interpersonal conflict: first-order factor model and its invariance across groups. , 1995, The Journal of applied psychology.

[81]  M. Cinnirella Towards a European identity? Interactions between the national and European social identities manifested by university students in Britain and Italy. , 1997 .

[82]  E. Naumann,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction and Commitment among Expatriate Managers , 1993 .

[83]  D. F. Coleman,et al.  Further assessments of a three-component model of occupational commitment : Generalizability and differences across occupations , 1997 .