Managing the Innovators for exploration and Exploitation

I analyze how to manage employees to achieve a balance between exploration and exploitation in large established firms. Previous studies suggest that, although firms need to undertake both exploration and exploitation simultaneously, this is difficult either because of the scarcity of resources or because of the incompatibility of these two processes. Proposed solutions have been ambidexterity, punctuated equilibrium or specialization. I suggest another method: managing employees. Specifically, I argue that using the so-called “innovative” system of human resource management practices, consisting of team-based incentive system, team-based job design, and job rotation, enables the firm to undertake exploration and exploitation simultaneously because it provides the psychological safety for people to explore new knowledge to make novel products and develops employees to have the perspective-taking capability that enables the integration of knowledge cross-functionally for efficiency. Using the so-called “traditional” system of human resource management practices, consisting of individual-based incentive system, individual-based job design, and no job rotation, has limited impact on either exploration or exploitation because it does not create the psychological safety for people to explore new knowledge and does not develop the perspective-taking capability needed for exploitation. Moreover, mixing practices from both systems is better than only using the traditional system in achieving exploration or exploitation, but less effective than only using the innovative system as the mix of practices can create inconsistent expectations on employees.

[1]  Vladimir Smirnov,et al.  Hold-up and Sequential Specific Investments , 2004 .

[2]  C. Un,et al.  Strategies for Knowledge Creation in Firms , 2004 .

[3]  Casey Ichniowski,et al.  The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity , 1995 .

[4]  Allan Afuah How much do your co-opetitors' capabilities matter in the face of technological change? , 2000 .

[5]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. , 1981 .

[6]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[7]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[8]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[9]  I. MacMillan,et al.  Manage customer-centric innovation--systematically. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[10]  S. Kerr On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. , 1975 .

[11]  Sue Newell,et al.  Central Agencies in the Diffusion and Design of Technology: A Comparison of the UK and Sweden , 1999 .

[12]  Mohanbir Sawhney,et al.  Innovation and Virtual Environments: Towards Virtual Knowledge Brokers , 2006 .

[13]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[14]  Casey Ichniowski,et al.  Using "Insider Econometrics" to Study Productivity , 2004 .

[15]  R. Grover,et al.  From Embedded Knowledge to Embodied Knowledge: New Product Development as Knowledge Management , 1998 .

[16]  Jon Gant,et al.  Social Capital and Organizational Change in High‐Involvement and Traditional Work Organizations , 2002 .

[17]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[18]  Paul Osterman,et al.  The Wage Effects of High Performance Work Organization in Manufacturing , 2006 .

[19]  H. Tsoukas The firm as a distributed knowledge system : A constructionist approach , 1996 .

[20]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[21]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[22]  John Paul Macduffie Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry , 1995 .

[23]  B. Bass LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE BEYOND EXPECTATIONS , 1985 .

[24]  Mikael Holmqvist A Dynamic Model of Intra-and Interorganizational Learning , 2003 .

[25]  Robert A. Burgelman Strategy as Vector and the Inertia of Coevolutionary Lock-in , 2002 .

[26]  Erwin Danneels The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[27]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Adding Interpersonal Learning and Tacit Knowledge to March's Exploration-Exploitation Model , 2006 .

[28]  R. Hogan,et al.  Development of an empathy scale. , 1969, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[29]  Steven Postrel,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Islands of Shared Knowledge: Specialization and Mutual Understanding in Problem-Solving Teams , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[30]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[31]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  Involving suppliers in product development in the United States and Japan: evidence for set-based concurrent engineering , 1996 .

[32]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[33]  Casey Ichniowski,et al.  Beyond Incentive Pay: Insiders' Estimates of the Value of Complementary Human Resource Management Practices , 2003 .

[34]  Charles Baden-Fuller,et al.  Lessons from the Celltech Case: Balancing Knowledge Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Renewal , 1999 .

[35]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[36]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  The Voice of the Customer , 1993 .

[37]  P. Adler,et al.  Flexibility Versus Efficiency? a Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[38]  S. Winter Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 1987 .

[39]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[40]  D. Dougherty,et al.  Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. , 1996 .

[41]  E. Schein Three Cultures of Management: The Key to Organizational Learning , 1996 .

[42]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[43]  Robert A. Burgelman Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field Research , 1991 .

[44]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[45]  H. Greve,et al.  Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams , 2006 .

[46]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[47]  William T. Harbaugh,et al.  The Carrot or the Stick: Rewards, Punishments and Cooperation , 2002 .

[48]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[49]  G. Pisano Knowledge Integration and the Locus of Learning: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[50]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[51]  J. March Continuity and Change in Theories of Organizational Action , 1996 .

[52]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  The Local and Variegated Nature of Learning in Organizations: A Group-Level Perspective , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[53]  Brian E. Becker,et al.  Methodological Issues in Cross‐Sectional and Panel Estimates of the Human Resource‐Firm Performance Link , 1996 .

[54]  Daniel Roos,et al.  The machine that changed the world : the story of lean production , 1991 .

[55]  Beth A. Bechky Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[56]  V. Vroom Work and motivation , 1964 .

[57]  D. Dougherty,et al.  The Illegitimacy of Successful Product Innovation in Established Firms , 1994 .

[58]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  WHEN EXPLORATION BACKFIRES: UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF MULTILEVEL ORGANIZATIONAL SEARCH , 2006 .

[59]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[60]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[61]  S. Newell,et al.  The Role of Professional Associations in Technology Diffusion , 1995 .

[62]  D. Tjosvold,et al.  Team learning from mistakes : the contribution of cooperative goals and problem-solving , 2004 .

[63]  E. Schein Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[64]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[65]  A. Edmondson Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[66]  Carolyn Axtell,et al.  SEEING ANOTHER VIEWPOINT: ANTECEDENTS AND OUTCOMES OF EMPLOYEE PERSPECTIVE TAKING , 2001 .

[67]  J. March Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence , 2006 .

[68]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[69]  C. Annique Un,et al.  Top Managers and the Product Improvement Process , 2005 .

[70]  Adam Smith Cognitive Empathy and Emotional Empathy in Human Behavior and Evolution , 2006 .

[71]  C. Un,et al.  Interactions with Customers for Innovation , 2007 .

[72]  Mikael Holmqvist,et al.  Experiential Learning Processes of Exploitation and Exploration Within and Between Organisations : An Empirical Study of Product Development, Department of Business Studies , 2003 .

[73]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[74]  Akira Takeishi,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Knowledge Partitioning in the Interfirm Division of Labor: The Case of Automotive Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[75]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  The Factory as a Learning Laboratory , 2000 .

[76]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[77]  B. Gerhart,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects , 1996 .

[78]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  The Mixed Effects of Inconsistency on Experimentation in Organizations , 2004, Organ. Sci..