Manipulation under anesthesia after primary knee arthroplasty in Sweden: incidence, patient characteristics and risk of revision

Background and purpose — The incidence of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) after knee arthroplasty surgery has been reported to vary between 0.5% and 10%. We evaluated the incidence of MUA after primary knee arthroplasty in Sweden, the demographics of the patients and the risk of revision. Patients and methods — Between 2009 and 2013, 64,840 primary total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (TKA and UKA) were registered in the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (SKAR). MUAs performed between 2009 and 2014 were identified through the in- and outpatient registers of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Pertinent data were verified through medical records and patient demographics and revisions were obtained from the SKAR. Results — 1,258 MUAs were identified. Of these, 1,078 were 1st-time MUAs, performed within 1 year after the primary knee arthroplasty. The incidence of MUA was 1.7% and the incidence varied between hospitals from 0% to 5%. The majority were performed after TKA (98%), in younger patients (65% < 65 years), women (64%), and relatively healthy persons (88% had ASA ≤ 2). The cumulative risk of revision at 10 years was 10% (95% CI 8.6–12), similar for men and women. Interpretation — In Sweden, MUA is a rather uncommon measure after knee arthroplasty, especially after UKA. The CRR at 10 years was doubled compared to the general knee arthroplasty population. The frequency of the procedure varies between hospitals but in general it is performed more frequently in healthier and younger patients.

[1]  D. Sheth,et al.  Reasons for Ninety-Day Emergency Visits and Readmissions After Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty: Results From a US Integrated Healthcare System. , 2018, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  W. van der Weegen,et al.  Manipulation under anesthesia following total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive review of literature , 2018, MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY.

[3]  D. Beverland,et al.  Knee manipulation for reduced flexion after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Is timing critical? , 2017, Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma.

[4]  Paulus Torkki,et al.  Fast-tracking for total knee replacement reduces use of institutional care without compromising quality , 2017, Acta orthopaedica.

[5]  T. Vail,et al.  Risk Factors, Outcomes, and Timing of Manipulation Under Anesthesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2018, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  Michael A. Mont,et al.  Does Manipulation under Anesthesia Increase the Risk of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Matched Case Control Study , 2017, The Journal of Knee Surgery.

[7]  J. Bellemans,et al.  Predictors of outcome after manipulation under anaesthesia in patients with a stiff total knee arthroplasty , 2017, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[8]  J. Lang,et al.  Factors Associated with Range of Motion Recovery Following Manipulation Under Anesthesia. , 2016, Surgical technology international.

[9]  H. Oh,et al.  Manipulation under Anesthesia for Stiffness after Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2015, Knee surgery & related research.

[10]  A. Troelsen,et al.  The risk of manipulation under anesthesia due to unsatisfactory knee flexion after fast-track total knee arthroplasty. , 2015, The Knee.

[11]  B. Werner,et al.  Manipulation Under Anesthesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated with An Increased Incidence of Subsequent Revision Surgery. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  Richard Davis,et al.  Repeat Manipulation Under Anesthesia For Persistent Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty Achieves Functional Range of Motion. , 2015, Surgical technology international.

[13]  Michael A. Mont,et al.  Do Various Factors Affect the Frequency of Manipulation Under Anesthesia After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty? , 2015, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  Stephen D. Fening,et al.  Risk factors for manipulation after total knee arthroplasty: a pooled electronic health record database study. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[15]  M. Kester,et al.  The effect of timing of manipulation under anesthesia to improve range of motion and functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty. , 2014, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  M. Kester,et al.  Clinical, objective, and functional outcomes of manipulation under anesthesia to treat knee stiffness following total knee arthroplasty. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  V. Goldberg,et al.  Predictors of Range of Motion in Patients Undergoing Manipulation After TKA , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  V. Raut,et al.  Manipulation for stiffness following total knee arthroplasty: when and how often to do it? , 2010, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.

[19]  D. East,et al.  Manipulation under anaesthesia post total knee replacement: long term follow up. , 2012, The Knee.

[20]  G. Westrich,et al.  Effect of body mass index on range of motion and manipulation after total knee arthroplasty. , 2011, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[21]  F. Mittag,et al.  Arthrofibrosis after TKA - Influence factors on the absolute flexion and gain in flexion after manipulation under anaesthesia , 2011, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[22]  M. Inacio,et al.  Early and late manipulation improve flexion after total knee arthroplasty. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[23]  M. Ritter,et al.  Manipulation after total knee arthroplasty. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  Paul A Lotke,et al.  Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Prevalence of the complication and outcomes of revision. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  M. Ritter,et al.  Predicting Range of Motion After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clustering, Log-Linear Regression, and Regression Tree Analysis , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  W. Harper,et al.  Manipulation of total knee replacements. Is the flexion gained retained? , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[27]  F. Dorey,et al.  The need for confidence intervals in the presentation of orthopaedic data. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.