Module organization and variance in protein-protein interaction networks

A module is a group of closely related proteins that act in concert to perform specific biological functions through protein–protein interactions (PPIs) that occur in time and space. However, the underlying module organization and variance remain unclear. In this study, we collected module templates to infer respective module families, including 58,041 homologous modules in 1,678 species, and PPI families using searches of complete genomic database. We then derived PPI evolution scores and interface evolution scores to describe the module elements, including core and ring components. Functions of core components were highly correlated with those of essential genes. In comparison with ring components, core proteins/PPIs were conserved across multiple species. Subsequently, protein/module variance of PPI networks confirmed that core components form dynamic network hubs and play key roles in various biological functions. Based on the analyses of gene essentiality, module variance, and gene co-expression, we summarize the observations of module organization and variance as follows: 1) a module consists of core and ring components; 2) core components perform major biological functions and collaborate with ring components to execute certain functions in some cases; 3) core components are more conserved and essential during organizational changes in different biological states or conditions.

[1]  B. Stillman,et al.  The DNA replication fork in eukaryotic cells. , 1998, Annual review of biochemistry.

[2]  Jerard Hurwitz,et al.  A Complex Consisting of Human Replication Factor C p40, p37, and p36 Subunits Is a DNA-dependent ATPase and an Intermediate in the Assembly of the Holoenzyme* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[4]  P. Havel Dietary fructose: implications for dysregulation of energy homeostasis and lipid/carbohydrate metabolism. , 2005, Nutrition reviews.

[5]  Gavin D. Grant,et al.  Common markers of proliferation , 2006, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[6]  D. Pe’er,et al.  Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[7]  William C Earnshaw,et al.  Borealin: a novel chromosomal passenger required for stability of the bipolar mitotic spindle. , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[8]  F. Crick Central Dogma of Molecular Biology , 1970, Nature.

[9]  Kara Dolinski,et al.  The BioGRID Interaction Database: 2011 update , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[10]  Ioannis Xenarios,et al.  DIP, the Database of Interacting Proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[11]  Berend Snel,et al.  Quantifying modularity in the evolution of biomolecular systems. , 2004, Genome research.

[12]  G. Wagner,et al.  The road to modularity , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[13]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[14]  Yoshihiro Yamanishi,et al.  KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[15]  Rafael A Irizarry,et al.  Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. , 2003, Biostatistics.

[16]  Jinn-Moon Yang,et al.  3D-interologs: an evolution database of physical protein- protein interactions across multiple genomes , 2010, BMC Genomics.

[17]  G. Kayser,et al.  Centrosome‐, chromosomal‐passenger‐ and cell‐cycle‐associated mRNAs are differentially regulated in the development of sporadic colorectal cancer , 2006, The Journal of pathology.

[18]  John M. Barnard,et al.  Chemical Similarity Searching , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[19]  S. Ehrlich,et al.  Essential Bacillus subtilis genes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Annotation transfer between genomes: protein-protein interologs and protein-DNA regulogs. , 2004, Genome research.

[21]  Gordon K Smyth,et al.  Linear Models and Empirical Bayes Methods for Assessing Differential Expression in Microarray Experiments , 2004, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[22]  M. Vidal,et al.  Identification of potential interaction networks using sequence-based searches for conserved protein-protein interactions or "interologs". , 2001, Genome research.

[23]  Gary D. Bader,et al.  An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks , 2003, BMC Bioinformatics.

[24]  Hans-Werner Mewes,et al.  CORUM: the comprehensive resource of mammalian protein complexes , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  Thijs J. G. Ettema,et al.  Modularity in the gain and loss of genes: applications for function prediction. , 2001, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[26]  J. Hurwitz,et al.  Loading of the human 9-1-1 checkpoint complex onto DNA by the checkpoint clamp loader hRad17-replication factor C complex in vitro , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  S. Lens,et al.  Cell division: control of the chromosomal passenger complex in time and space , 2013, Chromosoma.

[28]  P. Bork,et al.  Identification and analysis of evolutionarily cohesive functional modules in protein networks. , 2006, Genome research.

[29]  Jinn-Moon Yang,et al.  3D-partner: a web server to infer interacting partners and binding models , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[30]  Emmanuel D Levy,et al.  Evolution and dynamics of protein interactions and networks. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[31]  J. Hurwitz,et al.  Purification and characterization of human DNA damage checkpoint Rad complexes , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Xiaomei Wu,et al.  Prediction of yeast protein–protein interaction network: insights from the Gene Ontology and annotations , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[33]  Susumu Goto,et al.  Extraction of phylogenetic network modules from the metabolic network , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[34]  Haiyuan Yu,et al.  Detecting overlapping protein complexes in protein-protein interaction networks , 2012, Nature Methods.

[35]  M L Shuler,et al.  A modular minimal cell model: purine and pyrimidine transport and metabolism. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Ingmar Reuter,et al.  Integr8 and Genome Reviews: integrated views of complete genomes and proteomes , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[37]  Michael Griffin,et al.  Gene co-expression network topology provides a framework for molecular characterization of cellular state , 2004, Bioinform..

[38]  Rafael C. Jimenez,et al.  The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2012 , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[39]  K. Sossey-Alaoui,et al.  EVI5 protein associates with the INCENP-aurora B kinase-survivin chromosomal passenger complex and is involved in the completion of cytokinesis. , 2006, Experimental cell research.

[40]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[41]  Yan Lin,et al.  DEG 5.0, a database of essential genes in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[42]  Yi-Wei Lin,et al.  MoNetFamily: a web server to infer homologous modules and module–module interaction networks in vertebrates , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[43]  R. Medema,et al.  Survivin mediates targeting of the chromosomal passenger complex to the centromere and midbody , 2006, EMBO reports.

[44]  John Parkinson,et al.  The conservation and evolutionary modularity of metabolism , 2009, Genome Biology.

[45]  S. Dimauro,et al.  The genetics and pathology of oxidative phosphorylation , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[46]  R. Stauber,et al.  The Survivin–Crm1 interaction is essential for chromosomal passenger complex localization and function , 2006, EMBO reports.

[47]  Francesca D. Ciccarelli,et al.  Modification of Gene Duplicability during the Evolution of Protein Interaction Network , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[48]  Ginestra Bianconi,et al.  Scale-free networks with an exponent less than two. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[49]  B. Stillman,et al.  Reconstitution of Recombinant Human Replication Factor C (RFC) and Identification of an RFC Subcomplex Possessing DNA-dependent ATPase Activity* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[50]  Chun-Yu Lin,et al.  PPISearch: a web server for searching homologous protein–protein interactions across multiple species , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[51]  Livia Perfetto,et al.  MINT, the molecular interaction database: 2012 update , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[52]  Dennis B. Troup,et al.  NCBI GEO: archive for high-throughput functional genomic data , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[53]  R. Wolthuis,et al.  Cyclin B1–Cdk1 Activation Continues after Centrosome Separation to Control Mitotic Progression , 2007, PLoS biology.

[54]  Gregory D. Schuler,et al.  Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information: update , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[55]  Yung-Chiang Chen,et al.  DAPID: a 3D-domain annotated protein-protein interaction database. , 2006, Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics.

[56]  B. Hoffman,et al.  GADD45b and GADD45g are cdc2/cyclinB1 kinase inhibitors with a role in S and G2/M cell cycle checkpoints induced by genotoxic stress , 2002, Journal of cellular physiology.

[57]  Benno Schwikowski,et al.  Discovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular interaction networks , 2002, ISMB.

[58]  J R Neely,et al.  Relationship between carbohydrate and lipid metabolism and the energy balance of heart muscle. , 1974, Annual review of physiology.

[59]  Ryoma Ohi,et al.  The Chromosomal Passenger Complex Is Required for Chromatin-Induced Microtubule Stabilization and Spindle Assembly , 2004, Cell.

[60]  Dmitrij Frishman,et al.  MIPS: analysis and annotation of genome information in 2007 , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[61]  P. Bork,et al.  Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery , 2006, Nature.