Exemplar by feature applicability matrices and other Dutch normative data for semantic concepts

Features are at the core of many empirical and modeling endeavors in the study of semantic concepts. This article is concerned with the delineation of features that are important in natural language concepts and the use of these features in the study of semantic concept representation. The results of a feature generation task in which the exemplars and labels of 15 semantic categories served as cues are described. The importance of the generated features was assessed by tallying the frequency with which they were generated and by obtaining judgments of their relevance. The generated attributes also featured in extensive exemplar by feature applicability matrices covering the 15 different categories, as well as two large semantic domains (that of animals and artifacts). For all exemplars of the 15 semantic categories, typicality ratings, goodness ratings, goodness rank order, generation frequency, exemplar associative strength, category associative strength, estimated age of acquisition, word frequency, familiarity ratings, imageability ratings, and pairwise similarity ratings are described as well. By making these data easily available to other researchers in the field, we hope to provide ample opportunities for continued investigations into the nature of semantic concept representation. These data may be downloaded from the Psychonomic Society’s Archive of Norms, Stimuli, and Data, www.psychonomic.org/archive.

[1]  Chris McNorgan,et al.  An attractor model of lexical conceptual processing: simulating semantic priming , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  A. Tversky,et al.  Additive similarity trees , 1977 .

[3]  T. Shallice,et al.  Category specific semantic impairments , 1984 .

[4]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  Gert Storms,et al.  Word associations: Norms for 1,424 Dutch words in a continuous task , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[6]  L. K. Tyler,et al.  Conceptual Structure and the Structure of Concepts: A Distributed Account of Category-Specific Deficits , 2000, Brain and Language.

[7]  L. Rips Similarity, typicality, and categorization , 1989 .

[8]  N. Chater,et al.  Concepts and Similarity , 1997 .

[9]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Correlated properties in natural categories , 1984 .

[10]  Carlo Caltagirone,et al.  Analysis of the semantic representations of living and nonliving concepts: A normative study , 2006, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[11]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  The Large-Scale Structure of Semantic Networks: Statistical Analyses and a Model of Semantic Growth , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  Learning the Structure of Similarity , 1995, NIPS.

[13]  B. M.,et al.  Representational Aspects of Word Imageability and Word Frequency as Assessed Through Word Association , 2001 .

[14]  M. McCloskey The Stimulus Familiarity Problem in Semantic Memory Research , 1980 .

[15]  B. Tversky,et al.  Objects, parts, and categories. , 1984 .

[16]  Gert Storms,et al.  Linear separability in superordinate natural language concepts , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[17]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[18]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations , 1973 .

[19]  P. Groenen,et al.  Modern multidimensional scaling , 1996 .

[20]  Gregory L. Murphy,et al.  Cue validity and levels of categorization. , 1982 .

[21]  Jennifer M. Rodd,et al.  The Emergence of Semantic Categories from Distributed Featural Representations , 2001 .

[22]  M Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[23]  M. Gernsbacher Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  James A. Hampton,et al.  Measures of internal category structure: A correlational analysis of normative data , 1983 .

[25]  E. Rosch,et al.  Categorization of Natural Objects , 1981 .

[26]  I. Mechelen,et al.  Structural analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts , 1994 .

[27]  Ryszard S. Michalski,et al.  Categories and Concepts: Theoretical Views and Inductive Data Analysis , 1993 .

[28]  M. Ross Quillian,et al.  Retrieval time from semantic memory , 1969 .

[29]  P. Casey A reexamination of the roles of typicality and category dominance in verifying category membership , 1992 .

[30]  Wolf Vanpaemel,et al.  Dutch norm data for 13 semantic categories and 338 exemplars , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[31]  A. Tversky,et al.  Spatial versus tree representations of proximity data , 1982 .

[32]  Ken McRae,et al.  Category - Specific semantic deficits , 2008 .

[33]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Classification in well-defined and ill-defined categories: evidence for common processing strategies. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[34]  Danièle Dubois,et al.  Effects of classification context on categorization in natural categories , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[35]  T. Shallice,et al.  Deep Dyslexia: A Case Study of , 1993 .

[36]  Serge Larochelle,et al.  Determinants of Response Times in the Semantic Verification Task , 1994 .

[37]  J. Kounios,et al.  Dual-coding, context-availability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: an electrophysiological investigation. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  M. Lee,et al.  Extending the ALCOVE model of category learning to featural stimulus domains , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[39]  Michael J Kahana,et al.  Lexico-semantic structure and the word-frequency effect in recognition memory. , 2007, Learning & memory.

[40]  J. Carroll,et al.  Word Frequency and Age of Acquisition as Determiners of Picture-Naming Latency , 1973 .

[41]  L. Rips Inductive judgments about natural categories. , 1975 .

[42]  Steven Verheyen,et al.  Determining the dimensionality in spatial representations of semantic concepts , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[43]  W. Montague,et al.  Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms , 1969 .

[44]  Joseph P. Levy,et al.  The distinctiveness of form and function in category structure: A connectionist model , 1997 .

[45]  Katerina Maridaki-Kassotaki,et al.  Are rating-based procedures reliable for derivation of typicality judgments from children? , 1997 .

[46]  George S. Cree,et al.  Factors underlying category-specific semantic deficits , 2001 .

[47]  Eef Ameel,et al.  From Prototypes to Caricatures: Geometrical Models for Concept Typicality. , 2006 .

[48]  Roger N. Shepard,et al.  Additive clustering: Representation of similarities as combinations of discrete overlapping properties. , 1979 .

[49]  P. Schwanenflugel,et al.  Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[50]  Gerrit Storms,et al.  Prototype and Exemplar-Based Information in Natural Language Categories , 2000 .

[51]  Douglas L. Nelson,et al.  Concept Accessibility as the Determinant of Typicality Judgments , 1999 .

[52]  A. Paivio Imagery and verbal processes , 1972 .

[53]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Category-Specific Semantic Deficits in Focal and Widespread Brain Damage: A Computational Account , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  Gert Storms,et al.  Age-of-acquisition differences in young and older adults affect latencies in lexical decision and semantic categorization. , 2007, Acta psychologica.

[55]  Carlo Caltagirone,et al.  The role of semantic distance in category-specific impairments for living things: Evidence from a case of semantic dementia , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  L. Komatsu,et al.  Defining features of natural kinds and artifacts , 1989 .

[57]  Iven Mechelen,et al.  Dominance and noncommutativity effects in concept conjunctions: Extensional or intensional basis? , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[58]  Gerrit Storms,et al.  Formal models for intracetegorical structure that can be used for data-analysis , 1997 .

[59]  Jamie Reilly,et al.  Formal Distinctiveness of High- and Low-Imageability Nouns: Analyses and Theoretical Implications , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[60]  M. Ashcraft Property dominance and typicality effects in property statement verification , 1978 .

[61]  R. Logie,et al.  Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words , 1980 .

[62]  D. Balota,et al.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[63]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[64]  W. Quine Ontological Relativity and Other Essays , 1969 .

[65]  N. Henley A psychological study of the semantics of animal terms , 1969 .

[66]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Prototypicality, distinctiveness, and intercorrelation: Analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts , 2001, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[67]  D. Gentner,et al.  Splitting the Differences: A Structural Alignment View of Similarity , 1993 .

[68]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[69]  R. Lorch The role of two types of semantic information in the processing of false sentences , 1978 .

[70]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Cascade processes in picture identification , 1988 .

[71]  J. Altarriba,et al.  Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[72]  W. A. Bousfield,et al.  CULTURAL NORMS FOR VERBAL ITEMS IN 43 CATEGORIES , 1957 .

[73]  Edward J. Shoben,et al.  Applications of Multidimensional Scaling in Cognitive Psychology , 1983 .

[74]  E. Rosch,et al.  Relationships among goodness-of-example, category norms, and word frequency , 1976 .

[75]  E. Rosch Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[76]  Karsten Müller,et al.  Distinct brain representations for early and late learned words , 2003, NeuroImage.

[77]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Similar and Different: The Differentiation of Basic-Level Categories , 1997 .

[78]  Steven A. Sloman,et al.  Feature Centrality and Conceptual Coherence , 1998, Cogn. Sci..

[79]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Prototypes in the Mist: The Early Epochs of Category Learning , 1998 .

[80]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Natural categories: Well defined or fuzzy sets? , 1978 .

[81]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. , 1974 .

[82]  L. Barsalou Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[83]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Decision processes in verifying category membership statements: Implications for models of semantic memory , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[84]  Gerrit Storms Flemish Category Norms for Exemplars of 39 Categories: A Replication of the Battig and Montague (1969) Category Norms , 2001 .

[85]  Gert Storms,et al.  On the use of scaling and clustering in the study of semantic deficits. , 2003, Neuropsychology.

[86]  Barbara C. Malt,et al.  Do artifact concepts have cores , 1992 .

[87]  F. Keil Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development , 1989 .

[88]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  Real age of acquisition effects in word naming and lexical decision. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[89]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach , 2004 .

[90]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation. , 2004, Psychological review.

[91]  J. Chumbley,et al.  The roles of typicality, instance dominance, and category dominance in verifying category membership. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[92]  Tom Verguts,et al.  Beyond exemplars and prototypes as memory representations of natural concepts: A clustering approach☆ , 2007 .

[93]  D. Medin,et al.  The native mind: biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. , 2004, Psychological review.

[94]  Zachary Estes,et al.  Domain differences in the structure of artifactual and natural categories , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[95]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[96]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Ad hoc categories , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[97]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition ratings for 2332 Dutch words from 49 different semantic categories , 2003 .

[98]  Michael C. Doyle,et al.  Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: where are they? , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[99]  Edward J. Shoben,et al.  The Verification of Semantic Relations in a Same-Different Paradigm: An Asymmetry in Semantic Memory. , 1976 .

[100]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Modelling Parsing Constraints with High-dimensional Context Space , 1997 .

[101]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[102]  Serge Larochelle,et al.  What Some Effects Might not be: The Time to Verify Membership in “Well-Defined” Categories , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[103]  Susan A. Gelman,et al.  Domain differences in absolute judgments of category membership: Evidence for an essentialist account of categorization , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[104]  J. Hampton An investigation of the nature of abstract concepts , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[105]  Gerrit Storms,et al.  Feature importance in feature generation and typicality rating , 2003 .

[106]  J. Hampton Polymorphous Concepts in Semantic Memory , 1979 .

[107]  Tim Smits,et al.  Fruits and vegetables categorized: An application of the generalized context model , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.