Interactive Media Systems: Influence Strategies in Television Home Shopping

Abstract Little discourse-analytic work has been conducted on the changing forms of discourse in interactive media systems. In this study, a sample of teleshopping discourse was analyzed and five sets of strategies were identified. Teleshopping discourse constructed the appearance of trusting relationships with viewers through expressions of praise and friendliness and disclosures of personal views and emotions. Teleshopping discourse also displayed attempts to discover viewers' needs and desires and advocate the specific bene fits and uses of products. The discourse also displayed attempts to create coherent realities for products through product descriptions, explanations, history, education, demonstrations, testimonials, and endorsements, all of which were designed to be even more impressive with vivid descriptions, cognitive participation, and narrative. Finally, teleshopping discourse appeared designed to facilitate behavioral commitment by invoking choice heuristics, countering viewer objections, and using personal value appeals. These findings extend previous explanations of teleshopping that focus solely on parasocial interaction, and show that teleshopping discourse is distinctive because it involves lamination, the use of multiple forms of a persuasive strategy across different media or presentation forms.

[1]  Arnoldo C. Hax,et al.  The Strategy Concept and Process: A Pragmatic Approach , 1991 .

[2]  John Shotter,et al.  Social accountability and selfhood , 1984 .

[3]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Interactive Home Shopping: Consumer, Retailer, and Manufacturer Incentives to Participate in Electronic Marketplaces , 1997 .

[4]  K. Tracy,et al.  The identity work of questioning in intellectual discussion , 1994 .

[5]  The impact of digital television: will it change our shopping habits? , 1999 .

[6]  Lawrence A. Crosby,et al.  Relationship Quality in Services Selling: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective: , 1990 .

[7]  Keith Richards.  Working towards common understandings: Collaborative interaction in staffroom stories , 1999 .

[8]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  Influence : how and why people agree to things , 1985 .

[9]  Edward P. J. Corbett.  Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student , 1966 .

[10]  L. Bitzer.  The Rhetorical Situation. , 1968 .

[11]  Francesca Sgobbi,et al.  Alternative paths for the growth of e-commerce , 2001 .

[12]  J. Heritage,et al.  Aspects of the properties of formulations in natural conversations: Some instances analysed , 1980 .

[13]  Philip J. Auter,et al.  Buying from a Friend: A Content Analysis of Two Teleshopping Programs , 1993 .

[14]  C. Hutton.  Mutual misunderstanding: Scepticism and the theorizing of language and interpretation , 1993 .

[15]  R. Shoaps.  The many voices of Rush Limbaugh: The use of transposition in constructing a rhetoric of common sense , 1999 .

[16]  E. Goffman.  Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[17]  Tom Hopkins.  How to Master the Art of Selling , 1982 .

[18]  August E. Grant,et al.  Television Shopping , 1991 .

[19]  Rohan Samarajiva,et al.  Interactivity as though privacy mattered , 1997 .

[20]  R. Rubin,et al.  Attribution in Social and Parasocial Relationships , 1989 .