In vivo bioresponses to silk proteins.

Silks are appealing materials for numerous biomedical applications involving drug delivery, tissue engineering, or implantable devices, because of their tunable mechanical properties and wide range of physical structures. In addition to the functionalities needed for specific clinical applications, a key factor necessary for clinical success for any implanted material is appropriate interactions with the body in vivo. This review summarizes our current understanding of the in vivo biological responses to silks, including degradation, the immune and inflammatory response, and tissue remodeling with particular attention to vascularization. While we focus in this review on silkworm silk fibroin protein due to the large quantity of in vivo data thanks to its widespread use in medical materials and consumer products, spider silk information is also included if available. Silk proteins are degraded in the body on a time course that is dependent on the method of silk fabrication and can range from hours to years. Silk protein typically induces a mild inflammatory response that decreases within a few weeks of implantation. The response involves recruitment and activation of macrophages and may include activation of a mild foreign body response with the formation of multinuclear giant cells, depending on the material format and location of implantation. The number of immune cells present decreases with time and granulation tissue, if formed, is replaced by endogenous, not fibrous, tissue. Importantly, silk materials have not been demonstrated to induce mineralization, except when used in calcified tissues. Due to its ability to be degraded, silk can be remodeled in the body allowing for vascularization and tissue ingrowth with eventual complete replacement by native tissue. The degree of remodeling, tissue ingrowth, or other specific cell behaviors can be modulated with addition of growth or other signaling factors. Silk can also be combined with numerous other materials including proteins, synthetic polymers, and ceramics to enhance its characteristics for a particular function. Overall, the diverse array of silk materials shows excellent bioresponses in vivo with low immunogenicity and the ability to be remodeled and replaced by native tissue making it suitable for numerous clinical applications.

[1]  Liping Tang,et al.  Author ' s personal copy The effect of incorporation of SDF-1 a into PLGA scaffolds on stem cell recruitment and the inflammatory response , 2010 .

[2]  D. Kaplan,et al.  In vivo degradation of three-dimensional silk fibroin scaffolds. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[3]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Materials fabrication from Bombyx mori silk fibroin , 2011, Nature Protocols.

[4]  Je-Yong Choi,et al.  Inhibition of foreign body giant cell formation by 4- hexylresorcinol through suppression of diacylglycerol kinase delta gene expression. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[5]  Hongbin Fan,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament regeneration using mesenchymal stem cells and silk scaffold in large animal model. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[6]  D. Mcallister,et al.  Current tissue engineering strategies in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2014, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[7]  N. Abraham,et al.  Promotive effects of a silk film on epidermal recovery from full-thickness skin wounds. , 2000, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[8]  David L Kaplan,et al.  In vitro degradation of silk fibroin. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[9]  G. Invernici,et al.  Decellularized silk fibroin scaffold primed with adipose mesenchymal stromal cells improves wound healing in diabetic mice , 2014, Stem Cell Research & Therapy.

[10]  H. Lee,et al.  Reduction of inflammatory reaction of poly(d,l-lactic-co-glycolic Acid) using demineralized bone particles. , 2008, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[11]  H. Ouyang,et al.  Allogenous Tendon Stem/Progenitor Cells in Silk Scaffold for Functional Shoulder Repair , 2012, Cell transplantation.

[12]  Dichen Li,et al.  A novel silk-based artificial ligament and tricalcium phosphate/polyether ether ketone anchor for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - safety and efficacy in a porcine model. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[13]  David L. Kaplan,et al.  Silk Fibroin Conduits: A Cellular and Functional Assessment of Peripheral Nerve Repair , 2011, Annals of plastic surgery.

[14]  David L. Kaplan,et al.  Microfabricated Porous Silk Scaffolds for Vascularizing Engineered Tissues , 2013 .

[15]  K. Yamashita,et al.  Efficacy of polarized hydroxyapatite and silk fibroin composite dressing gel on epidermal recovery from full-thickness skin wounds. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[16]  A. Sica,et al.  Macrophage plasticity and polarization in tissue repair and remodelling , 2013, The Journal of pathology.

[17]  Y. Abiko,et al.  Silk fibroin-based scaffolds for bone regeneration. , 2013, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[18]  Miss A.O. Penney (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[19]  Y. Seo,et al.  Increase in cell migration and angiogenesis in a composite silk scaffold for tissue‐engineered ligaments , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[20]  Hongjuan Liu,et al.  Biocompatibility of silk-tropoelastin protein polymers. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[21]  J. Goh,et al.  In vivo study of anterior cruciate ligament regeneration using mesenchymal stem cells and silk scaffold. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[22]  Keji Zhang,et al.  Weft-knitted silk-poly(lactide-co-glycolide) mesh scaffold combined with collagen matrix and seeded with mesenchymal stem cells for rabbit Achilles tendon repair , 2015, Connective tissue research.

[23]  X Y Wang,et al.  Biofunctionalized electrospun silk mats as a topical bioactive dressing for accelerated wound healing. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[24]  James M. Anderson,et al.  Biological Responses to Materials , 2001 .

[25]  T. Asakura,et al.  Biological reaction to small-diameter vascular grafts made of silk fibroin implanted in the abdominal aortae of rats. , 2015, Annals of vascular surgery.

[26]  J. Xiong,et al.  Silk fibroin/gelatin electrospun nanofibrous dressing functionalized with astragaloside IV induces healing and anti-scar effects on burn wound. , 2015, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[27]  Wanchai De-Eknamkul,et al.  Monitoring of inflammatory mediators induced by silk sericin. , 2009, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[28]  Y. Seo,et al.  Silk and collagen scaffolds for tendon reconstruction , 2014, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[29]  D. Kaplan,et al.  VEGF and BMP-2 promote bone regeneration by facilitating bone marrow stem cell homing and differentiation. , 2014, European cells & materials.

[30]  Geraldine Mitchell,et al.  The influence of architecture on degradation and tissue ingrowth into three-dimensional poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) scaffolds in vitro and in vivo. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[31]  Sterling V. Mead,et al.  Sterilization , 1929, Catalysis from A to Z.

[32]  David L Kaplan,et al.  Electrospun silk-BMP-2 scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[33]  James M. Anderson,et al.  Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. , 2008, Seminars in immunology.

[34]  Amir A. Al-Munajjed,et al.  The healing of bony defects by cell-free collagen-based scaffolds compared to stem cell-seeded tissue engineered constructs. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[35]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Biocompatibility and osteoconduction of macroporous silk fibroin implants in cortical defects in sheep. , 2013, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[36]  X Baur,et al.  Use of immunoblot technique for detection of human IgE and IgG antibodies to individual silk proteins. , 1985, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[37]  C. M. Agrawal,et al.  Sterilization, toxicity, biocompatibility and clinical applications of polylactic acid/polyglycolic acid copolymers. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[38]  Lu Wang,et al.  Promoted dermis healing from full-thickness skin defect by porous silk fibroin scaffolds (PSFSs). , 2010, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[39]  Wei Xue,et al.  Therapeutic efficacy of antibiotic-loaded gelatin microsphere/silk fibroin scaffolds in infected full-thickness burns. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[40]  Z. Wang,et al.  Exploring natural silk protein sericin for regenerative medicine: an injectable, photoluminescent, cell-adhesive 3D hydrogel , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[41]  G. Maxwell,et al.  Ten-year results from the natrelle® 410 anatomical form stable silicone breast implant core study , 2014 .

[42]  M. Sumi,et al.  Long-term patency of small-diameter vascular graft made from fibroin, a silk-based biodegradable material. , 2010, Journal of vascular surgery.

[43]  K. S. Jones,et al.  Effects of biomaterial-induced inflammation on fibrosis and rejection. , 2008, Seminars in immunology.

[44]  M. Jacquet,et al.  Silk fibroin: Structural implications of a remarkable amino acid sequence , 2001, Proteins.

[45]  S. Toh,et al.  Variation of the effect of calcium phosphate enhancement of implanted silk fibroin ligament bone integration. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[46]  Fuhua Huang,et al.  In vitro and in vivo characterization of a silk fibroin-coated polyester vascular prosthesis. , 2008, Artificial organs.

[47]  M. Maitz,et al.  Multifunctional silk-heparin biomaterials for vascular tissue engineering applications. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[48]  T. Sutherland,et al.  Insect silk: one name, many materials. , 2010, Annual review of entomology.

[49]  Elizabeth B. Habermann,et al.  Are mastectomies on the rise? A 13-year trend analysis of the selection of mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy in 5865 patients , 2011 .

[50]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Remodeling of tissue-engineered bone structures in vivo. , 2013, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[51]  J. Deprest,et al.  Tensile Strength and Host Response towards Silk and Type I Polypropylene Implants Used for Augmentation of Fascial Repair in a Rat Model , 2006, Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation.

[52]  David L. Kaplan,et al.  New Opportunities for an Ancient Material , 2010, Science.

[53]  C. H. Park,et al.  Clinical Outcomes of Silk Patch in Acute Tympanic Membrane Perforation , 2015, Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology.

[54]  G. Freddi,et al.  Biodegradation of Bombyx mori silk fibroin fibers and films , 2004 .

[55]  David L. Kaplan,et al.  Impact of silk biomaterial structure on proteolysis. , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.

[56]  C. Cannizzaro,et al.  Tubular silk scaffolds for small diameter vascular grafts , 2010, Organogenesis.

[57]  K. P. Murphy,et al.  Janeway's immunobiology , 2007 .

[58]  D. Herbage,et al.  Collagen-based biomaterials as 3D scaffold for cell cultures: applications for tissue engineering and gene therapy , 2000, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[59]  F H Silver,et al.  Self-assembly of collagen fibers. Influence of fibrillar alignment and decorin on mechanical properties. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[60]  Lindsay S. Wray,et al.  Arrayed Hollow Channels in Silk‐Based Scaffolds Provide Functional Outcomes for Engineering Critically Sized Tissue Constructs , 2014, Advanced functional materials.

[61]  G. Vunjak‐Novakovic,et al.  Stem cell-based tissue engineering with silk biomaterials. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[62]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Soft tissue augmentation using silk gels: an in vitro and in vivo study. , 2009, Journal of periodontology.

[63]  E. Khor Methods for the treatment of collagenous tissues for bioprostheses. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[64]  K. Anselme,et al.  Inhibition of calcification in vivo by acyl azide cross-linking of a collagen-glycosaminoglycan sponge. , 1992, Matrix.

[65]  Ivan Martin,et al.  Silk matrix for tissue engineered anterior cruciate ligaments. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[66]  Peter Lin,et al.  Development of Small-Diameter Vascular Grafts , 2007, World Journal of Surgery.

[67]  M. Barbeck,et al.  Fine‐tuning scaffolds for tissue regeneration: effects of formic acid processing on tissue reaction to silk fibroin , 2010, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[68]  María Blanes,et al.  A comparison of electrospun polymers reveals poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) fiber as a superior scaffold for cardiac repair. , 2014, Stem cells and development.

[69]  D. Kaplan,et al.  The effect of sterilization on silk fibroin biomaterial properties. , 2015, Macromolecular bioscience.

[70]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[71]  Irene Georgakoudi,et al.  Effect of processing on silk-based biomaterials: reproducibility and biocompatibility. , 2011, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[72]  Z. Ge,et al.  Assessment of silk fibroin for the repair of buccal mucosa in a rat model. , 2012, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[73]  G. Freddi,et al.  In vivo Regeneration of Elastic Lamina on Fibroin Biodegradable Vascular Scaffold , 2013, The International journal of artificial organs.

[74]  G. Zoccali,et al.  Direct to implant breast reconstruction by using SERI®, preliminary report , 2014, Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research.

[75]  Ivan Martin,et al.  Angiogenesis in tissue engineering: breathing life into constructed tissue substitutes. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[76]  Keiji Numata,et al.  Mechanism of enzymatic degradation of beta-sheet crystals. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[77]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Long-term effects of knitted silk-collagen sponge scaffold on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and osteoarthritis prevention. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[78]  D. Roh,et al.  Wound healing effect of silk fibroin/alginate-blended sponge in full thickness skin defect of rat , 2006, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[79]  Ronald E. Unger,et al.  Scaffold vascularization in vivo driven by primary human osteoblasts in concert with host inflammatory cells. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[80]  T. Asakura,et al.  Preparation of double-raschel knitted silk vascular grafts and evaluation of short-term function in a rat abdominal aorta , 2011, Journal of Artificial Organs.

[81]  Y. Seo,et al.  Correlation between scaffold in vivo biocompatibility and in vitro cell compatibility using mesenchymal and mononuclear cell cultures , 2009, Cell Biology and Toxicology.

[82]  David L Kaplan,et al.  The inflammatory responses to silk films in vitro and in vivo. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[83]  David L Kaplan,et al.  Silk-based biomaterials. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[84]  Joon K. Song,et al.  Cellular Responses of Bioabsorbable Polymeric Material and Guglielmi Detachable Coil in Experimental Aneurysms , 2002, Stroke.

[85]  M. Luyn,et al.  Modulation of the tissue reaction to biomaterials , 1994 .

[86]  Jiankang He,et al.  A novel silk–TCP–PEEK construct for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an off-the shelf alternative to a bone–tendon–bone autograft , 2014, Biofabrication.

[87]  C James Kirkpatrick,et al.  The rapid anastomosis between prevascularized networks on silk fibroin scaffolds generated in vitro with cocultures of human microvascular endothelial and osteoblast cells and the host vasculature. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[88]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Biocompatibility of a Sonicated Silk Gel for Cervical Injection During Pregnancy , 2014, Reproductive sciences.

[89]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Quantifying osteogenic cell degradation of silk biomaterials. , 2010, Biomacromolecules.

[90]  CastellanoDelia,et al.  A comparison of electrospun polymers reveals poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) fiber as a superior scaffold for cardiac repair. , 2014 .

[91]  Yugyung Lee,et al.  Biomedical applications of collagen. , 2001, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[92]  J. Priestley,et al.  Regenerative potential of silk conduits in repair of peripheral nerve injury in adult rats. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[93]  Moon Suk Kim,et al.  An in vivo study of the host tissue response to subcutaneous implantation of PLGA- and/or porcine small intestinal submucosa-based scaffolds. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[94]  김소연,et al.  Collagen Scaffolds Derived from a Marine Source and Their Biocompatibility , 2006 .