An EMG-based model to estimate lumbar muscle forces and spinal loads during complex, high-effort tasks: Development and application to residential construction using prefabricated walls

Abstract Residential building construction is moving toward more industrialized construction methods (e.g., use of prefabricated wall or “panels”), yet remains one of highest risk sectors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. The centralized design process inherent in the use of wall panels offers the potential for proactive control of musculoskeletal risks, consistent with the prevention-through-design (or PtD) philosophy. As part of an ongoing effort to incorporate ergonomics into panel design, estimates of low back loading and injury risk were needed over a range of tasks performed during panelized construction. Here, a free-dynamic, three-dimensional, electromyography-based model was developed to provide such estimates, which was a modification of an earlier, relatively coarser model. Specific modifications included a more detailed representation of lumbar muscle anatomy and contraction dynamics, high-pass filtering of electromyograms to better represent muscle activation levels, and an enhanced calibration procedure through which five model parameters are specified on an individual basis and used to estimate lumbar muscle forces. With these enhancements, the predictive ability of the model was assessed over a wide range of simulated panel erection tasks. Predicted model parameters corresponded well with values reported earlier. Reasonable levels of correspondence were found between measured and predicted lumbosacral moments, though predictive ability varied between tasks and rotation planes. Relevance to industry Wall panels are representative of the current trend toward increasing use of industrialized methods in residential construction. Model-based estimates can be used as part of a larger project to facilitate proactive design of residential construction using panelized walls in order to reduce musculoskeletal exposures and spine injury risks.

[1]  G A Mirka,et al.  The quantification of EMG normalization error. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[2]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Effects of preload on load displacement curves of the lumbar spine. , 1977, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[3]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Electromechanical delay in human skeletal muscle under concentric and eccentric contractions , 1979, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[4]  Francisco J. Valero Cuevas,et al.  Epoch length to accurately estimate the amplitude of interference EMG is likely the result of unavoidable amplitude cancellation , 2008, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[5]  P. Komi,et al.  Signal characteristics of EMG with special reference to reproducibility of measurements. , 1975, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[6]  William S. Marras,et al.  Modification of an EMG-assisted biomechanical model for pushing and pulling , 2007 .

[7]  W. Marras,et al.  An EMG-assisted model of trunk loading during free-dynamic lifting. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Thomas R. Waters,et al.  Applications manual for the revised NIOSH lifting equation , 1994 .

[9]  Charles L Geraci,et al.  National Prevention through Design (PtD) Initiative. , 2008, Journal of safety research.

[10]  W. Marras,et al.  Variation in spinal load and trunk dynamics during repeated lifting exertions. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Lumbar muscle force estimation using a subject-invariant 5-parameter EMG-based model. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Peter Vink,et al.  Specificity of surface-EMG on the intrinsic lumbar back muscles , 1989 .

[13]  G. Vanderstraeten,et al.  A Functional Subdivision of Hip, Abdominal, and Back Muscles During Asymmetric Lifting , 2001, Spine.

[14]  I. Kingma,et al.  Evidence for a role of antagonistic cocontraction in controlling trunk stiffness during lifting. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  M Parnianpour,et al.  The effects of resistance level on muscle coordination patterns and movement profile during trunk extension. , 1993, Spine.

[16]  J. Cholewicki,et al.  Trunk Muscle Recruitment Patterns in Patients With Low Back Pain Enhance the Stability of the Lumbar Spine , 2003, Spine.

[17]  R. Norman,et al.  1986 Volvo Award in Biomechanics: Partitioning of the L4 - L5 Dynamic Moment into Disc, Ligamentous, and Muscular Components During Lifting , 1986, Spine.

[18]  John Rasmussen,et al.  A generic detailed rigid-body lumbar spine model. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  P Vink,et al.  A functional subdivision of the lumbar extensor musculature. Recruitment patterns and force-RA-EMG relationships under isometric conditions. , 1987, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  Maury A. Nussbaum,et al.  Low back injury risks during construction with prefabricated (panelised) walls: effects of task and design factors , 2011, Ergonomics.

[21]  van Dieën Jh.  Asymmetry of erector spinae muscle activity in twisted postures and consistency of muscle activation patterns across subjects , 1996 .

[22]  S. McGill,et al.  Appropriately placed surface EMG electrodes reflect deep muscle activity (psoas, quadratus lumborum, abdominal wall) in the lumbar spine. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  E. Vos,et al.  Electromechanical delay in the vastus lateralis muscle during dynamic isometric contractions , 1990, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[24]  I. Stokes,et al.  Structural behavior of human lumbar spinal motion segments. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  Jim R Potvin,et al.  Effects of EMG processing on biomechanical models of muscle joint systems: sensitivity of trunk muscle moments, spinal forces, and stability. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Barbara Silverstein,et al.  Prioritizing prevention opportunities in the Washington State construction industry, 2003-2007. , 2010, Journal of safety research.

[27]  Gary M Franklin,et al.  Automated hand‐held nerve conduction devices: Raw data, raw interpretations , 2011, Muscle & nerve.

[28]  H. M. Toussaint,et al.  The electro-mechanical delay of the erector spinae muscle: influence of rate of force development, fatigue and electrode location , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[29]  A B Schultz,et al.  Co‐contraction of lumbar muscles during the development of time‐varying triaxial moments , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[30]  R. Norman,et al.  Mechanically corrected EMG for the continuous estimation of erector spinae muscle loading during repetitive lifting , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[31]  J H van Dieën,et al.  Total trunk muscle force and spinal compression are lower in asymmetric moments as compared to pure extension moments. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  R. Norman,et al.  Comparison of muscle forces and joint load from an optimization and EMG assisted lumbar spine model: towards development of a hybrid approach. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  S. McGill.  Electromyographic activity of the abdominal and low back musculature during the generation of isometric and dynamic axial trunk torque: Implications for lumbar mechanics , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[34]  J H van Dieën,et al.  Lumbar loading during lifting: a comparative study of three measurement techniques. , 2001, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[35]  M A Nussbaum,et al.  Evaluation of artificial neural network modelling to predict torso muscle activity. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[36]  R Van Audekercke,et al.  Statistical modelling of fatigue-related electromyographic median frequency characteristics of back and hip muscles during a standardized isometric back extension test. , 2005, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[37]  P. Komi,et al.  Electromechanical delay in skeletal muscle under normal movement conditions. , 1979, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[38]  Stephen H M Brown,et al.  Co-activation alters the linear versus non-linear impression of the EMG-torque relationship of trunk muscles. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  W S Marras,et al.  A stochastic model of trunk muscle coactivation during trunk bending. , 1993, Spine.

[40]  I. Stokes,et al.  Spinal stiffness increases with axial load: another stabilizing consequence of muscle action. , 2003, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[41]  W. Marras,et al.  An EMG-assisted model of loads on the lumbar spine during asymmetric trunk extensions. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[42]  Hester J Lipscomb,et al.  Work-related injuries in residential and drywall carpentry. , 2003, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[43]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Support for a linear length-tension relation of the torso extensor muscles: an investigation of the length and velocity EMG-force relationships. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[44]  M. Parnianpour,et al.  Trunk biomechanical models based on equilibrium at a single-level violate equilibrium at other levels , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[45]  A Thorstensson,et al.  Fibre types in human lumbar back muscles. , 1987, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[46]  J. Cholewicki,et al.  Mechanical stability of the in vivo lumbar spine: implications for injury and chronic low back pain. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[47]  G. Vanderstraeten,et al.  Intra-operator and inter-operator reliability of surface electromyography in the clinical evaluation of back muscles. , 2001, Manual therapy.

[48]  J H van Dieën,et al.  Effects of antagonistic co-contraction on differences between electromyography based and optimization based estimates of spinal forces , 2005, Ergonomics.

[49]  O. Lippold,et al.  The relation between force, velocity and integrated electrical activity in human muscles , 1954, The Journal of physiology.

[50]  W. Marras,et al.  A Biomechanical Assessment and Model of Axial Twisting in the Thoracolumbar Spine , 1995, Spine.

[51]  M. Parnianpour,et al.  Synergy of the human spine in neutral postures , 1998, European Spine Journal.

[52]  Jaap H. van Dieën,et al.  Are recruitment patterns of the trunk musculature compatible with a synergy based on the maximization of endurance , 1997 .

[53]  Stephen H. M. Brown,et al.  Less is more: high pass filtering, to remove up to 99% of the surface EMG signal power, improves EMG-based biceps brachii muscle force estimates. , 2004, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[54]  Maury A. Nussbaum,et al.  Development of a decision support system for residential construction using panellised walls: Approach and preliminary results , 2009, Ergonomics.

[55]  M J Pearcy,et al.  A Universal Model of the Lumbar Back Muscles in the Upright Position , 1992, Spine.

[56]  J Cholewicki,et al.  EMG assisted optimization: a hybrid approach for estimating muscle forces in an indeterminate biomechanical model. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[57]  Jimmie Hinze,et al.  Role of designers in construction worker safety , 1992 .

[58]  S. McGill.  A myoelectrically based dynamic three-dimensional model to predict loads on lumbar spine tissues during lateral bending. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[59]  Hester J Lipscomb,et al.  Direct Costs and Patterns of Injuries Among Residential Carpenters, 1995–2000 , 2003, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[60]  C Larivière,et al.  Comparative ability of EMG, optimization, and hybrid modelling approaches to predict trunk muscle forces and lumbar spine loading during dynamic sagittal plane lifting. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[61]  Clark R Dickerson,et al.  High‐pass filtering surface EMG in an attempt to better represent the signals detected at the intramuscular level , 2010, Muscle & nerve.

[62]  I A Stokes,et al.  Quantitative anatomy of the lumbar musculature. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.