Cognitive processes in two-point discrimination: an ERP study

OBJECTIVE To elucidate the temporal features of the cognitive process in two-point discrimination (TPD). METHODS We measured somatosensory event-related potentials (ERPs) in 9 subjects during the TPD task, in which we provided a pair of electrical pulses simultaneously, altering the distance between the electrodes. We analyzed the TPD-related ERPs and investigated the relationship between the potentials and the subjects' judgments. RESULTS During the TPD task, a negative potential approximately 140 ms after the stimulation (N140) was enhanced as compared to a stimulus counting task. Two late positive components, LPC-1 and LPC-2, whose peak latencies were 300 and 500 ms, respectively, were identified only in the TPD task. The LPC-1 was recorded dominantly in the fronto-central area, while the LPC-2 was detected dominantly in the centro-parietal area. The amplitude of the LPC-2 was significantly modulated by the degree of consistency in the subjects' judgment. On the other hand, these ERP components did not show significant difference between the alternate judgments, i.e. 'one-point' or 'two-point' judgment. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that the N140 is related to the attention toward the stimulation. The LPC-1 and LPC-2 are likely to correspond to the processes represented by P3a and P3b, based on their temporal and spatial behavior.

[1]  C Tomberg,et al.  Mapping early somatosensory evoked potentials in selective attention: critical evaluation of control conditions used for titrating by difference the cognitive P30, P40, P100 and N140. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  F. Mauguière,et al.  Target side and scalp topography of the somatosensory P300. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Decision-related cortical potentials during an auditory signal detection task with cued observation intervals , 1975 .

[4]  D Friedman,et al.  A brain event related to the making of a sensory discrimination. , 1979, Science.

[5]  R. Näätänen.  Attention and brain function , 1992 .

[6]  T. Wasaka,et al.  Changes in the somatosensory N250 and P300 by the variation of reaction time , 2003, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[7]  P. H. Lindsay,et al.  Evoked Potential Correlates of Auditory Signal Detection , 1971, Science.

[8]  R Kakigi,et al.  Neural activities during Wisconsin Card Sorting Test--MEG observation. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[9]  J E Desmedt,et al.  P300 in serial tasks: an essential post-decision closure mechanism. , 1980, Progress in brain research.

[10]  V. Jousmäki,et al.  Activation of a distributed somatosensory cortical network in the human brain. A dipole modelling study of magnetic fields evoked by median nerve stimulation. Part I: Location and activation timing of SEF sources. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Vertex potentials evoked during auditory signal detection: Relation to decision criteria , 1973 .

[12]  H. Shibasaki,et al.  Somatosensory event-related potentials following different stimulus conditions. , 1992, The International journal of neuroscience.

[13]  C Bassetti,et al.  Sensory syndromes in parietal stroke , 1993, Neurology.

[14]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  Vision Modulates Somatosensory Cortical Processing , 2002, Current Biology.

[15]  P. Michie,et al.  The effects of spatial selective attention on the somatosensory event-related potential. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[16]  N. Squires,et al.  Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  F Mauguière,et al.  Activation of a distributed somatosensory cortical network in the human brain: a dipole modelling study of magnetic fields evoked by median nerve stimulation. Part II: Effects of stimulus rate, attention and stimulus detection. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  D Robertson,et al.  Differential enhancement of early and late components of the cerebral somatosensory evoked potentials during forced‐paced cognitive tasks in man , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  P. Tueting,et al.  Event-related brain potentials in man , 1978 .

[20]  Hiroki Nakata,et al.  Differential modulation of temporal and frontal components of the somatosensory N140 and the effect of interstimulus interval in a selective attention task. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[21]  J. Desmedt,et al.  Slow potential shifts and decision P350 interactions in tasks with random sequences of near-threshold clicks and finger stimuli delivered at regular intervals. , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  Koji Inui,et al.  Central mechanisms for two-point discrimination in humans , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[23]  H. Shibasaki,et al.  Human auditory and somatosensory event-related potentials: effects of response condition and age. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  Tetsuo Kida,et al.  Somatosensory N250 and P300 during discrimination tasks. , 2003, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[25]  F Shawkat,et al.  Centrifugal and centripetal mechanisms involved in the 'gating' of cortical SEPs during movement. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  P Sandroni,et al.  Readiness to respond in a target detection task: pre- and post-stimulus event-related potentials in normal subjects. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  P. Haggard,et al.  Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans , 2001, Current Biology.

[28]  C. Shagass,et al.  Somatosensory evoked potential changes with a selective attention task. , 1982, Psychophysiology.

[29]  J S Kim,et al.  Discriminative sensory dysfunction after unilateral stroke. , 1996, Stroke.

[30]  B Milner,et al.  Somatosensory thresholds--contrasting effects of postcentral-gyrus and posterior parietal-lobe excisions. , 1970, Archives of neurology.

[31]  E. Donchin,et al.  COGNITIVE PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY: THE ENDOGENOUS COMPONENTS OF THE ERP , 1978 .

[32]  J Debecker,et al.  Wave form and neural mechanism of the decision P350 elicited without pre-stimulus CNV or readiness potential in random sequences of near-threshold auditory clicks and finger stimuli. , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[33]  T. D. Waberski,et al.  Spatiotemporal Imaging of Electrical Activity Related to Attention to Somatosensory Stimulation , 2002, NeuroImage.

[34]  F. Mauguière,et al.  Somatosensory responses during selective spatial attention: The N120‐to‐N140 trasition , 1995 .

[35]  H Hämäläinen,et al.  Is the somatosensory N250 related to deviance discrimination or conscious target detection? , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.