Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of heat cure silicone soft liner to an acrylic resin denture base in a simulated oral environment - A comparative SEM study

Aim: To assess and compare the effect of surface treatments in a simulated oral environment through thermocycling on tensile bond strength of silicone soft liner with acrylic resin base. Settings and Design: In Vitro Comparative and SEM analytical study. Materials and Methodology: 120 samples of heat cured acrylic resin (DPI) and silicone soft liner (Molloplast B) with desired dimensions were fabricated using customized brass flask. 120 samples were divided into 1 control group (untreated) and 3 test groups (treated) consisting of 30 samples each. 3 test groups were divided based on surface treatments of resin samples to adhere to silicone soft liner to them via acid etching (36% phosphoric acid), air abrasion (50 μm Al2O3) and laser treatment (Er-YAG). All the 4 groups (1 control and 3 test groups) were subdivided into two subgroups based on their subjection to thermocycling i.e., 15 samples of each group were not subjected to thermocycling (before) and remaining 15 samples of each group were subjected to thermocycling (after). Statistical Analysis Used: All the samples were evaluated for tensile bond strength using universal testing machine. Obtained values were statistically analyzed with student paired T test, one way ANOVA and post HOC Tukey B test to compare, identify significant differences and also to arrive at order of groups. The effects of surface treatments and silicone liner on the surface of denture base resin were examined with scanning electron microscopy. Results: The tensile bond strength was significantly different between control and test groups and also among test groups before and after thermocycling (P < 0.05). The specimens of acid group had higher bond strength values followed by laser treated and abraded groups. Thermocycling had decreased bond strength values. SEM observations also revealed that, surface treatments modified the surface of the denture base resin with variability. Conclusions: Surface treatments increased the bond strength values while thermocycling had decreased them. Among all the groups tested, acid etching group of samples exhibited higher bond strength values of all test groups before and after thermocycling followed by laser, abrasion and control groups. Bond strength values of all test groups before and after thermocycling were still higher than 0.45 MPa, which is clinically acceptable bond strength level.

[1]  Simone Kreve,et al.  Denture Liners: A Systematic Review Relative to Adhesion and Mechanical Properties , 2019, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[2]  M. Nakhaei,et al.  Effect of Different Surface Treatments and Thermocycling on Bond Strength of a Silicone-based Denture Liner to a Denture Base Resin. , 2016, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[3]  M. Gundogdu,et al.  Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of soft denture lining materials to an acrylic resin denture base. , 2014, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  Somayeh Zeighami,et al.  The Effect of Thermocycling on Tensile Bond Strength of Two Soft Liners , 2013, Journal of dentistry.

[5]  Thilak B. Shetty,et al.  Resilient Liners: A Review , 2012, Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society.

[6]  K. Datta,et al.  Evaluation of tensile bond strength of heat cure and autopolymerizing silicone-based resilient denture liners before and after thermocycling. , 2012, Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research.

[7]  H. Akin,et al.  Tensile bond strength of silicone-based soft denture liner to two chemically different denture base resins after various surface treatments , 2012, Lasers in Medical Science.

[8]  R. S. Kulkarni,et al.  The effect of denture base surface pretreatments on bond strengths of two long term resilient liners , 2011, The journal of advanced prosthodontics.

[9]  H. Akin,et al.  Effect of different surface treatments on tensile bond strength of silicone-based soft denture liner , 2011, Lasers in Medical Science.

[10]  M. Dhanraj,et al.  Comparative Evaluation Of Tensile Bond Strength Of Heat Polymerized Permanent Acrylic Soft Liner With Various Surface Pre – Treatments Of Denture Base - An Invitro Study , 2009 .

[11]  Rafael Leonardo Xediek Consani,et al.  Effects of thermocycling on the tensile bond strength of three permanent soft denture liners. , 2008, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[12]  C. Elias,et al.  EFFECT OF THERMOCYCLING ON THE TENSILE AND SHEAR BOND STRENGTHS OF THREE SOFT LINERS TO A DENTURE BASE RESIN , 2007, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[13]  O. Yapıcı,et al.  The evaluation of microleakage and bond strength of a silicone-based resilient liner following denture base surface pretreatment. , 2006, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  José Renato Ribeiro Pinto,et al.  Effect of thermocycling on bond strength and elasticity of 4 long-term soft denture liners. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[15]  D. Jagger,et al.  Effect of ageing on the bond strength of a permanent denture soft lining material. , 2002, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[16]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Lased and sandblasted denture base surface preparations affecting resilient liner bonding. , 1997, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[17]  R. G. Craig,et al.  Comparison of bond strength of six soft denture liners to denture base resin. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  W. Amin,et al.  The nature of the interface between polymethyl methacrylate denture base materials and soft lining materials. , 1981, Journal of dentistry.

[19]  J. V. von Fraunhofer,et al.  Some physical properties of four resilient lining materials. , 1976, Journal of dentistry.

[20]  R. G. Craig,et al.  Properties of resilient denture liners. , 1961, Journal of the American Dental Association.