The role of maintenance thalidomide therapy in multiple myeloma: MRC Myeloma IX results and meta-analysis.

Thalidomide maintenance has the potential to modulate residual multiple myeloma (MM) after an initial response. This trial compared the effect of thalidomide maintenance and no maintenance on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in MM patients. After intensive or nonintensive induction therapy, 820 newly diagnosed MM patients were randomized to open-label thalidomide maintenance until progression, or no maintenance. Interphase FISH (iFISH) analysis was performed at study entry. Median PFS was significantly longer with thalidomide maintenance (log-rank P < .001). Median OS was similar between regimens (log-rank P = .40). Patients with favorable iFISH showed improved PFS (P = .004) and a trend toward a late survival benefit. Patients with adverse iFISH receiving thalidomide showed no significant PFS benefit and worse OS (P = .009). Effective relapse therapy enhanced survival after progression, translating into a significant OS benefit. Meta-analysis of this and other studies show a significant late OS benefit (P < .001, 7-year difference hazard ratio = 12.3; 95% confidence interval, 5.5-19.0). Thalidomide maintenance significantly improves PFS and can be associated with improved OS. iFISH testing is important in assessing the clinical impact of maintenance therapy. Overview analysis demonstrated that thalidomide maintenance was associated with a significant late OS benefit. This trial was registered at www.isrctn.org as #ISRCTN68454111.

[1]  S. Lonial Relapsed multiple myeloma. , 2010, Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program.

[2]  A. Hinke,et al.  Thalidomide maintenance treatment increases progression-free but not overall survival in elderly patients with myeloma , 2010, Haematologica.

[3]  R. Hohl,et al.  Differential activities of thalidomide and isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway inhibitors in multiple myeloma cells. , 2010, Leukemia research.

[4]  P. Sonneveld,et al.  A randomized phase 3 study on the effect of thalidomide combined with adriamycin, dexamethasone, and high-dose melphalan, followed by thalidomide maintenance in patients with multiple myeloma. , 2010, Blood.

[5]  B. Barlogie,et al.  International Myeloma Working Group molecular classification of multiple myeloma: spotlight review , 2009, Leukemia.

[6]  B. Pégourié,et al.  Efficacy of melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide in patients older than 75 years with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: IFM 01/01 trial. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Consolidation therapy with low-dose thalidomide and prednisolone prolongs the survival of multiple myeloma patients undergoing a single autologous stem-cell transplantation procedure. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. , 2009, Seminars in hematology.

[9]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Thalidomide arm of Total Therapy 2 improves complete remission duration and survival in myeloma patients with metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities. , 2008, Blood.

[10]  M. Boccadoro,et al.  Oral melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: updated results of a randomized controlled trial. , 2008, Blood.

[11]  D. Reece,et al.  A meta-analysis and systematic review of thalidomide for patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma. , 2008, Cancer treatment reviews.

[12]  W. Jędrzejczak,et al.  Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Eight‐year median survival in multiple myeloma after total therapy 2: roles of thalidomide and consolidation chemotherapy in the context of total therapy 1 , 2008, British journal of haematology.

[14]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  VAD-doxil versus VAD-doxil plus thalidomide as initial treatment for multiple myeloma: results of a multicenter randomized trial of the Greek Myeloma Study Group. , 2007, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[15]  L. Mileshkin,et al.  An analysis of clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of single-agent thalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma , 2007, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[16]  Serge Leyvraz,et al.  Maintenance therapy with thalidomide improves survival in patients with multiple myeloma. , 2006, Blood.

[17]  B. Barlogie,et al.  International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma , 2006, Leukemia.

[18]  A. Krishnan,et al.  Maintenance thalidomide following single cycle autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma , 2006, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[19]  John Crowley,et al.  Thalidomide and hematopoietic-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  H. Goldschmidt,et al.  A systematic review of phase‐II trials of thalidomide monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma , 2006, British journal of haematology.

[21]  Rafael Fonseca,et al.  Phase III clinical trial of thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a clinical trial coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  G Muller,et al.  Thalidomide and its analogs overcome drug resistance of human multiple myeloma cells to conventional therapy. , 2000, Blood.

[23]  S. Jagannath,et al.  CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING DISEASE RESPONSE AND PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA TREATED BY HIGH‐DOSE THERAPY AND HAEMOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION , 1998, British journal of haematology.

[24]  R. Souhami,et al.  A mathematical model relating response durations to amount of subclinical resistant disease. , 1991, Cancer research.

[25]  W. Gregory Adjusting survival curves for imbalances in prognostic factors. , 1988, British Journal of Cancer.

[26]  V. Devita,et al.  Conflict of Interest Disclosures , 2018, Global spine journal.