To share or not to share: reliability assurance via redundant cellular connectivity in Connected Cars

As adoption of connected cars (CCs) grows, the expectation is that 5G will better support safety-critical vehicle-to-everything (V2X) use cases. Operationally, most relationships between cellular network providers and car manufacturers or users are exclusive, providing a single network connectivity, with at best an occasional option of a back-up plan if the single network is unavailable. We question if this setup can provide QoS assurance for V2X use cases. Accordingly, in this paper, we investigate the role of redundancy in providing QoS assurance for cellular connectivity for CCs. Using our bespoke Android measurement app, we did a drive-through test on 380 kilometers of major and minor roads in South East England. We measured round trip times, jitter, page load times, packet loss, network type, uplink speed and downlink speeds on the four UK networks for 14 UK-centric websites every five minutes. In addition, we did the same measurement using a much more expensive universal SIM card provider that promises to fall back on any of the four UK networks to assure reliability. By comparing actual performance on the best performing network versus the universal SIM, and then projected performance of a two/three/four multi-operator setup, we make three major contributions. First, the use of redundant multi-connectivity, especially if managed by the demand-side, can deliver superior performance (up to 28 percentage points in some cases). Second, despite costing 95x more per GB of data, the universal SIM performed worse than the best performing network except for uplink speed, highlighting how the choice of parameter to monitor can influence operational decisions. Third, any assessment of CC connectivity reliability based on availability is sub-optimal as it can hide significant under-performance.

[1]  Geng Wu,et al.  5G Network Capacity: Key Elements and Technologies , 2014, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.

[2]  Javier Gozalvez,et al.  LTE-V for Sidelink 5G V2X Vehicular Communications: A New 5G Technology for Short-Range Vehicle-to-Everything Communications , 2017, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.

[3]  Philip Branch,et al.  A Survey of Round Trip Time Prediction Systems , 2018, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[4]  J. Whalley,et al.  Speed isn't everything: a multi-criteria analysis of broadband access speeds in the UK , 2016 .

[5]  Nishanth R. Sastry,et al.  From ATM to MPLS and QCI: The Evolution of Differentiated QoS Standards and Implications for 5G Network Slicing , 2020, IEEE Communications Standards Magazine.

[6]  Athul Prasad,et al.  Ultra-High Reliable 5G V2X Communications , 2019, IEEE Communications Standards Magazine.

[7]  S.H. Lee,et al.  Reliability Evaluation of a Flow Network , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[8]  Kapil Gulati,et al.  A comparison of cellular vehicle-to-everything and dedicated short range communication , 2017, 2017 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC).

[9]  Antonio Iera,et al.  5G Network Slicing for Vehicle-to-Everything Services , 2017, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[10]  Vijay Gopalakrishnan,et al.  Connected cars in cellular network: a measurement study , 2017, Internet Measurement Conference.