THE STRUCTURE OF CONSCIENTIOUSNESS: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION BASED ON SEVEN MAJOR PERSONALITY QUESTIONNAIRES

The purpose of this study was to identify the underlying structure of the trait domain of Conscientiousness using scales drawn from 7 major personality inventories. Thirty-six scales conceptually related to Conscientiousness were administered to a large community sample (N= 737); analyses of those scales revealed a hierarchical structure with 6 factors: industriousness, order, self-control, responsibility, traditionalism, and virtue. All 6 factors demonstrated excellent convergent validity. Three of the 6 factors, industriousness, order, and self-control, showed good discriminant validity. The remaining 3 factors—responsibility, traditionalism and virtue—appear to be interstitial constructs located equally between Conscientiousness and the remaining Big Five dimensions. In addition, the 6 underlying factors had both differential predictive validity and provided incremental validity beyond the general factor of Conscientiousness when used to predict a variety of criterion variables, including work dedication, drug use, and health behaviors.

[1]  Raymond B. Cattell,et al.  The Description of Personality: Principles and Findings in a Factor Analysis , 1945 .

[2]  L. Guttman.  Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis , 1954 .

[3]  H. Kaiser.  The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis , 1960 .

[4]  J. Horn.  A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis , 1965, Psychometrika.

[5]  P. E. Vernon,et al.  The scientific analysis of personality , 1966 .

[6]  John L. Horn,et al.  On the internal consistency reliability of factors. , 1969 .

[7]  R. Cattell.  The scientific analysis of personality , 1970 .

[8]  Richard G. Montanelli,et al.  An Investigation of the Parallel Analysis Criterion for Determining the Number of Common Factors , 1975 .

[9]  R. Gorsuch.  Factor Score Reliabilities and Domain Validities , 1980 .

[10]  J. H. Steiger.  Statistically based tests for the number of common factors , 1980 .

[11]  E. L. Kelly,et al.  Personality and compatibility: a prospective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  R. Gorsuch,et al.  Number of Factors in the Personality Sphere: Does Increase in Factors Increase Predictability of Real-Life Criteria? , 1988 .

[13]  Newell K. Eaton,et al.  Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities , 1990 .

[14]  T. Conway,et al.  Demonstration of replicable dimensions of health behaviors. , 1990, Preventive medicine.

[15]  P. Costa,et al.  Facet Scales for Agreeableness and Conscientiousness: A Revision of the NEO Personality Inventory☆ , 1991 .

[16]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[17]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[18]  L. Hough.  The 'Big Five' Personality Variables--Construct Confusion: Description Versus Prediction , 1992 .

[19]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  R. McCrae,et al.  An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[21]  P. Costa,et al.  Four ways five factors are basic , 1992 .

[22]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Reply to Eysenck , 1992 .

[23]  P. Costa,et al.  Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO-Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) , 1992 .

[24]  H. Friedman,et al.  Does childhood personality predict longevity? , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. , 1993 .

[26]  John A. Johnson,et al.  Clarification of the Five-Factor Model With the Abridged Big Five Dimensional Circumplex , 1993 .

[27]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[28]  L. R. Goldberg.  The structure of phenotypic personality traits. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[29]  R. Vickers,et al.  Associations between major domains of personality and health behavior. , 1994, Journal of personality.

[30]  Dennis W. Organ,et al.  Personality and Organizational Citizenship Behavior , 1994 .

[31]  Phil A. Silva,et al.  Personality traits are linked to crime among men and women: evidence from a birth cohort. , 1994, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[32]  B. Meglino,et al.  The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: An exami , 1994 .

[33]  D. Organ,et al.  A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW OF ATTITUDINAL AND DISPOSITIONAL PREDICTORS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR , 1995 .

[34]  Lynda A. King,et al.  Relationships of job and family involvement, family social support, and work-family conflict with job and life satisfaction , 1996 .

[35]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Individual differences and behavior in organizations , 1996 .

[36]  Richard L. Gorsuch,et al.  Effects of under- and overextraction on principal axis factor analysis with varimax rotation. , 1996 .

[37]  J. M. Digman.  Higher-order factors of the Big Five. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  W. Borman,et al.  A Theory of Individual Differences in Task and Contextual Performance , 1997 .

[39]  M. Perugini,et al.  A hierarchical faceted model of the Big Five , 1997 .

[40]  J. Bermúdez,et al.  Personality Psychology in Europe , 1997 .

[41]  G Saucier,et al.  Effects of Variable Selection on the Factor Structure of Person Descriptors toward Optimal Variable Sampling in Personality Psychology , 2022 .

[42]  J. M. Digman.  Higher-order factors of the Big Five. , 1997 .

[43]  S. West,et al.  The investigation of personality structure: Statistical models , 1997 .

[44]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Six approaches to the explication of facet‐level traits: examples from conscientiousness , 1998 .

[45]  M. Ashton.  Personality and job performance: the importance of narrow traits , 1998 .

[46]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  What is beyond the big five? , 1998, Journal of personality.

[47]  N. Kressin,et al.  Intrapersonal Characteristics and the Timing of Divorce: A Prospective Investigation , 1998 .

[48]  J. Hogan,et al.  Relations Between Contextual Performance, Personality, and Occupational Advancement , 1998 .

[49]  Sampo V. Paunonen.  Hierarchical Organization of Personality and Prediction of Behavior , 1998 .

[50]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. , 1999 .

[51]  Greg L. Stewart,et al.  Trait bandwidth and stages of job performance : Assessing differential effects for conscientiousness and its subtraits , 1999 .

[52]  L. R. Goldberg.  The Curious Experiences Survey, a revised version of the Dissociative Experiences Scale : Factor structure, reliability, and relations to demographic and personality variables , 1999 .

[53]  G Saucier,et al.  Hierarchical subcomponents of the Big Five personality factors: a cross-language replication. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  C. A. Higgins,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS, GENERAL MENTAL ABILITY, AND CAREER SUCCESS ACROSS THE LIFE SPAN , 1999 .

[55]  Aryeh D. Stein,et al.  Carrots and Sticks: Impact of an Incentive/disincentive Employee Flexible Credit Benefit Plan on Health Status and Medical Costs , 1999, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[56]  P. Bongers,et al.  Linear and nonlinear relations between psychosocial job characteristics, subjective outcomes, and sickness absence: baseline results from SMASH. Study on Musculoskeletal Disorders, Absenteeism, Stress, and Health. , 2000, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[57]  I.L.D. Houtman,et al.  Linear and nonlinear relations between psychosocial job characteristics, subjective outcomes, and sickness absence : baseline results from SMASH , 2000 .

[58]  A. Erez,et al.  ADAPTABILITY TO CHANGING TASK CONTEXTS: EFFECTS OF GENERAL COGNITIVE ABILITY, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, AND OPENNESS TO EXPERIENCE , 2000 .

[59]  Linda M. Kneidinger,et al.  Not Just the Usual Cast of Characteristics: Using Personality To Predict College Performance and Retention. , 2000 .

[60]  D. Ladd,et al.  Helping Coworkers and Helping the Organization: The Role of Support Perceptions, Exchange Ideology, and Conscientiousness1 , 2000 .

[61]  F. Oswald,et al.  Personnel selection: looking toward the future--remembering the past. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[62]  Robert Hogan,et al.  A socioanalytic perspective on person–environment interaction. , 2000 .

[63]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  The hierarchical structure of common Turkish person‐descriptive adjectives , 2000 .

[64]  D N Jackson,et al.  What is beyond the big five? Plenty! , 2000, Journal of personality.

[65]  H. Moon,et al.  The two faces of conscientiousness: duty and achievement striving in escalation of commitment dilemmas. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[66]  M. Ashton,et al.  Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[67]  N. Anderson,et al.  Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology , 2001 .

[68]  Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko,et al.  Investigating the Hierarchical Factor Structure of the Fifth Edition of the 16PF: an Application of the Schmid-Leiman Orthogonalization Procedure , 2001 .

[69]  Deniz S. Ones,et al.  The structure, measurement, validity, and use of personality variables in industrial, work, and organizational psychology. , 2001 .

[70]  M. Newcomb,et al.  Prospective relationships between drug problems and work adjustment in a community sample of adults. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[71]  D. Ones,et al.  Personality at work: Criterion-focused occupational personality scales used in personnel selection , 2001 .

[72]  Sampo V. Paunonen,et al.  Hierarchical Organization of Personality and Prediction of Behavior , 1998 .

[73]  Gerard Saucier,et al.  Orthogonal Markers for Orthogonal Factors: The Case of the Big Five , 2002 .

[74]  B. de Raad,et al.  The substantive nature of psycholexical personality factors: a comparison across languages. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[75]  Michael J. Burke,et al.  GENERAL SAFETY PERFORMANCE: A TEST OF A GROUNDED THEORETICAL MODEL , 2002 .

[76]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  Personality traits and eating habits: The assessment of food preferences in a large community sample. , 2002 .

[77]  Lois E. Tetrick,et al.  Handbook of occupational health psychology , 2003 .

[78]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  Use of Personality Variables in Work Settings , 2003 .

[79]  B. Roberts,et al.  A lexical investigation of the lower-order structure of conscientiousness. , 2004 .

[80]  D. Jackson,et al.  PERSONALITY MEASURES AS PREDICTORS OF JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYTIC REVIEW , 2006 .

[81]  Karin A. Orvis,et al.  A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.