Information systems project teams: factors for high performance

Purpose The purpose of this research is twofold: identify and gain a better insight on factors that can influence high performance of Information Systems (IS) project teams from the perspective of IS professionals (i.e. team members and leaders), and thus contribute to the general discussion on high-performance project teams; and offer both IS project team members and their project managers some feedback on how to build and manage teams more constructively and to enhance team performance in today’s demanding business environment. Design/methodology/approach The authors used an exploratory case study of a small-size holding company and a qualitative analysis of the data to address the research questions. Findings Results show a set of perceived factors that can influence high team performance in IS projects. Participants’ perceptions barely coincide. For instance, mutual trust was the only factor suggested as facilitating high team performance by 5 participants (out of 13). Differences may be because of participants’ characteristics (e.g. time on the job). All perceived factors are classified in the literature as nontechnical (i.e. having to do with behavioral and/or socio-organizational matters of project management). Originality/value This paper is among the very few empirical studies consolidating knowledge on high-performance IS project teams (e.g. it is still unclear if there are IS project team-specific factors that influence high performance). For the highly technical IS industry, this study came across human-centric factors transversal to different project teams.

[1]  Aske Plaat,et al.  Towards high performance software teamwork , 2013, EASE '13.

[2]  A. S. Godoy,et al.  Introdução à pesquisa qualitativa e suas possibilidades , 1995 .

[3]  Hans J. Thamhain,et al.  Linkages of project environment to performance: lessons for team leadership , 2004 .

[4]  Wei Sun,et al.  Transformational leadership, team climate, and team performance within the NPD team: Evidence from China , 2014 .

[5]  Terry Bragg,et al.  Turn around an ineffective team , 1999 .

[6]  Mila Hakanen,et al.  Building Trust in High-Performing Teams , 2012 .

[7]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  On Teams, Teamwork, and Team Performance: Discoveries and Developments , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[8]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  What Determines Information Systems Project Performance? A Narrative Review and Meta-analysis , 2015, 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  João Varajão,et al.  What team members perceive as important to achieve high performance : an exploratory case study , 2014 .

[10]  Awie Leonard,et al.  Social relationships in IT project teams: its role, complexity and the management thereof , 2022, International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management.

[11]  Goparaju Purna Sudhakar,et al.  Soft factors affecting the performance of software development teams , 2011 .

[12]  Stacie Petter,et al.  Examining High Performance Teams in Information Systems Projects , 2013, AMCIS.

[13]  J. Collins,et al.  IT Project Teams and Their Leaders: Interaction Expectations , 2010 .

[14]  C. Piotrowski,et al.  Shared leadership: A critical component in IT Project Management , 2014 .

[15]  João Varajão,et al.  Motivations for high performance teams of information systems projects , 2017 .

[16]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams , 2006, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[17]  J. Katzenbach,et al.  The discipline of teams. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[18]  P. Curșeu,et al.  Minority dissent as teamwork related mental model: Implications for willingness to dissent and group creativity , 2016 .

[19]  Tobin Porterfield,et al.  Conflict management and performance of information technology development teams , 2016 .