Advances in multifocal methods for imaging human brain activity

The typical multifocal stimulus used in visual evoked potential (VEP) studies consists of about 60 checkerboard stimulus patches each independently contrast reversed according to an m-sequence. Cross correlation of the response (EEG, MEG, ERG, or fMRI) with the m-sequence results in a series of response kernels for each response channel and each stimulus patch. In the past the number and complexity of stimulus patches has been constrained by graphics hardware, namely the use of look-up-table (LUT) animation methods. To avoid such limitations we replaced the LUTs with true color graphic sprites to present arbitrary spatial patterns. To demonstrate the utility of the method we have recorded simultaneously from 192 cortically scaled stimulus patches each of which activate about 12mm2 of cortex in area V1. Because of the sparseness of cortical folding, very small stimulus patches and robust estimation of dipole source orientation, the method opens a new window on precise spatio-temporal mapping of early visual areas. The use of sprites also enables multiplexing stimuli such that at each patch location multiple stimuli can be presented. We have presented patterns with different orientations (or spatial frequencies) at the same patch locations but independently temporally modulated, effectively doubling the number of stimulus patches, to explore cell population interactions at the same cortical locus. We have also measured nonlinear responses to adjacent pairs of patches, thereby getting an edge response that doubles the spatial sampling density to about 1.8 mm on cortex.

[1]  Thom Carney,et al.  Using multi-stimulus VEP source localization to obtain a retinotopic map of human primary visual cortex , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  B. Fischer,et al.  Visual field representations and locations of visual areas V1/2/3 in human visual cortex. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[3]  M A Bearse,et al.  Assessment of early retinal changes in diabetes using a new multifocal ERG protocol. , 2001, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  E. Sutter,et al.  M and P Components of the VEP and their Visual Field Distribution , 1997, Vision Research.

[5]  S. Klein,et al.  The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  R. Shapley,et al.  Orientation Selectivity in Macaque V1: Diversity and Laminar Dependence , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Alex R. Wade,et al.  Geometric and metric properties of visual areas V1 and V2 in humans , 2005 .

[8]  Xian Zhang,et al.  A principal component analysis of multifocal pattern reversal VEP. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[9]  H. Lüdtke,et al.  Pupil perimetry using M-sequence stimulation technique. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  Erich E. Sutter,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(01)00078-5 , 2001 .

[11]  A. James,et al.  Effect of temporal sparseness and dichoptic presentation on multifocal visual evoked potentials , 2005, Visual Neuroscience.

[12]  Thom Carney,et al.  Electrophysiological estimate of human cortical magnification , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  Erich E. Sutter,et al.  The Fast m-Transform: A Fast Computation of Cross-Correlations with Binary m-Sequences , 1991, SIAM J. Comput..

[14]  Linda Henriksson,et al.  Multifocal fMRI mapping of visual cortical areas , 2005, NeuroImage.

[15]  Ee Sutter,et al.  A deterministic approach to nonlinear systems analysis , 1992 .