A knowledge-based perspective on system weaknesses in technological innovation systems

The literature on technological innovation systems (TIS) provides policymakers and other actors with a scheme of analysis to identify system weaknesses. In doing so, TIS analysis centres on which system weaknesses policy interventions should target to promote further development of a particular system. However, prior TIS literature has not sufficiently elaborated on what may constitute the conceptual roots of a ‘weakness’. We apply a knowledge-based perspective and propose that many—albeit not all—system weaknesses may root in four types of knowledge problems: uncertainty, complexity, equivocality, and ambiguity. Employing these as sensitizing concepts, we study system weaknesses by analysing data from a biorefinery TIS in Sweden. This analysis results in novel implications for the TIS literature and for achieving a better match between system weaknesses and the design of innovation policies.

[1]  P. Aghion,et al.  The Environment and Directed Technical Change , 2009, The American economic review.

[2]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  The Co-evolution of Technology, Industrial Structure, and Supporting Institutions , 1994 .

[3]  C. Edquist,et al.  The Choice of Innovation Policy Instruments , 2013, Holistic Innovation Policy.

[4]  Joakim Wincent,et al.  Beyond Managing Uncertainty: Insights From Studying Equivocality in the Fuzzy Front End of Product and Process Innovation Projects , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[5]  Tobias S. Schmidt,et al.  The need to increase the policy relevance of the functional approach to Technological Innovation Systems (TIS) , 2015 .

[6]  Pablo del Río,et al.  The market failure and the systemic failure rationales in technological innovation systems , 2013 .

[7]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  Managing Interorganizational Innovation Projects: Mitigating the Negative Effects of Equivocality Through Knowledge Search Strategies , 2016 .

[8]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: Contributions and suggestions for research , 2011 .

[9]  B. Carlsson,et al.  On the nature, function and composition of technological systems , 1991 .

[10]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Understanding the formative stage of technological innovation system development: The case of natural gas as an automotive fuel , 2010 .

[11]  V. Gilsing,et al.  A system failure framework for innovation policy design , 2005 .

[12]  T. R. Featheringham,et al.  On systemic problem solving and the error of the third kind , 1974 .

[13]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The emergence and troubled growth of a 'biopower' innovation system in Sweden , 2008 .

[14]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  The role of pilot and demonstration plants in technology development and innovation policy , 2016 .

[15]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Innovation System Strengths and Weaknesses in Progressing Sustainable Technology : The Case of Swedish Biorefinery Development , 2016 .

[16]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  THE IMPACT OF NETWORK MANAGEMENT ON OUTCOMES IN GOVERNANCE NETWORKS , 2010 .

[17]  Tobias S. Schmidt,et al.  An analysis of remote electric mini-grids in Laos using the Technological Innovation Systems approach , 2015 .

[18]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[19]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The dynamics of sustainable innovation journeys , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[20]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[21]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Hydrogen technological innovation systems in practice: comparing Danish and American approaches to fuel cell development , 2015 .

[22]  Burkhard Schade,et al.  Leaving fossil fuels behind? An innovation system analysis of low carbon cars , 2013 .

[23]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Explaining the failure of the Dutch innovation system for biomass digestion : A functional analysis , 2007 .

[24]  M. Hekkert,et al.  How perceived uncertainties influence transitions; the case of micro-CHP in the Netherlands. , 2007 .

[25]  E. Uyarra,et al.  Policies for science, technology and innovation:: Translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting , 2008 .

[26]  Gilles Bertrand,et al.  On the dynamics , 2007, Image Vis. Comput..

[27]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[28]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Networks and network resources in technological innovation systems: Towards a conceptual framework for system building , 2012 .

[29]  Linda M. Kamp,et al.  A comparative analysis of Photovoltaic Technological Innovation Systems including international dimensions: the cases of Japan and The Netherlands , 2013 .

[30]  J. S. Metcalfe Systems Failure and the Case for Innovation Policy , 2005 .

[31]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  Analyzing interdependencies between policy mixes and technological innovation systems: the case of offshore wind in Germany , 2016 .

[32]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Crossing the biorefinery valley of death? : A role-based typology for understanding actor networks ability to overcome barriers in sustainability transitions , 2017 .

[33]  H. Blumer What Is Wrong with Social Theory , 1954 .

[34]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The Analytical Approach and Methodology , 2002 .

[35]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis , 2016 .

[36]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[37]  B. Carlsson Technological Systems in the Bio Industries , 2002 .

[38]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Cumulative causation in the formation of a technological innovation system: The case of biofuels in the Netherlands , 2009 .

[39]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  The influence of perceived uncertainty on entrepreneurial action in emerging renewable energy technology; biomass gasification projects in the Netherlands , 2007 .

[40]  F. Berkhout,et al.  Functional evolution and accumulation of technological innovation systems: the case of renewable energy in East Africa , 2015 .

[41]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Can Technology-Specific Deployment Policies Be Cost-Effective? The Case of Renewable Energy Support Schemes , 2018 .

[42]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Network management and renewable energy development: An analytical framework with empirical illustrations , 2017 .

[43]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems , 2012 .

[44]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[45]  Alvar Palm,et al.  An emerging innovation system for deployment of building-sited solar photovoltaics in Sweden , 2015 .

[46]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  If managing knowledge is the solution, then what's the problem? , 2001 .

[47]  K. Dirks,et al.  Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation , 2013 .

[48]  Florian Kern,et al.  Engaging with the politics, agency and structures in the technological innovation systems approach☆ , 2015 .

[49]  L. Weingart,et al.  Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams , 2007 .

[50]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis , 2008 .

[51]  Y. Malhotra Knowledge management and Business Model Innovation , 2001 .

[52]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  Understanding reflexive systems of innovation: An analysis of Swedish nanotechnology discourse and organization , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[53]  Chao-chen Chung National, sectoral and technological innovation systems: The case of Taiwanese pharmaceutical biotechnology and agricultural biotechnology innovation systems (1945--2000) , 2012 .

[54]  Paula Kivimaa,et al.  Creative Destruction or Mere Niche Creation? Innovation Policy Mixes for Sustainability Transitions , 2015 .

[55]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[56]  L. Fleming Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search Lee Fleming , 2001 .

[57]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[58]  Kieron Flanagan,et al.  Four dangers in innovation policy studies – and how to avoid them , 2016 .

[59]  Jack A. Nickerson,et al.  A Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm - A Problem-solving Perspective , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[60]  E. Uyarra,et al.  Reconceptualising the 'policy mix' for innovation , 2011 .

[61]  E. Klijn designing and managing networks: possibilities and limitations for network management , 2005 .

[62]  Mark Winskel,et al.  The hesitant emergence of low carbon technologies in the UK: the micro-CHP innovation system , 2011, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..