Spontaneous Learning of Visual Structures in Domestic Chicks

Simple Summary Our aim is to investigate the recognition of the structure of multi-element configurations; one mechanism that supports communicative functions in different species. Cognitive mechanisms involved in this ability might not have evolved specifically for communicative use, but derive from other functions. Thus, it is crucial to study these abilities in species that are not vocal learners and with stimuli from other modalities. We know already that domestic chicks can learn the temporal statistical structure of sequences of visual shapes, however their abilities to encode the spatial structure of visual patterns (configurations composed of multiple visual elements presented simultaneously side-by-side) is much less known. Using filial imprinting learning, we showed that chicks spontaneously recognize the structure of their imprinting stimulus, preferring it to one composed of the same elements in different configurations. Moreover, we found that in their affiliative responses chicks give priority to information located at the stimulus edges, a phenomenon that was so far observed only with temporal sequences. This first evidence of a spontaneous edge bias with spatial stimuli further stresses the importance of studying similarities and differences between the processing of linguistic and nonlinguistic stimuli and of stimuli presented in various sensory modalities. Abstract Effective communication crucially depends on the ability to produce and recognize structured signals, as apparent in language and birdsong. Although it is not clear to what extent similar syntactic-like abilities can be identified in other animals, recently we reported that domestic chicks can learn abstract visual patterns and the statistical structure defined by a temporal sequence of visual shapes. However, little is known about chicks’ ability to process spatial/positional information from visual configurations. Here, we used filial imprinting as an unsupervised learning mechanism to study spontaneous encoding of the structure of a configuration of different shapes. After being exposed to a triplet of shapes (ABC or CAB), chicks could discriminate those triplets from a permutation of the same shapes in different order (CAB or ABC), revealing a sensitivity to the spatial arrangement of the elements. When tested with a fragment taken from the imprinting triplet that followed the familiar adjacency-relationships (AB or BC) vs. one in which the shapes maintained their position with respect to the stimulus edges (AC), chicks revealed a preference for the configuration with familiar edge elements, showing an edge bias previously found only with temporal sequences.

[1]  J. Saffran,et al.  Dog is a dog is a dog: Infant rule learning is not specific to language , 2007, Cognition.

[2]  S. Edelman,et al.  Juvenile zebra finches learn the underlying structural regularities of their fathers’ song , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[3]  P. Bateson How do sensitive periods arise and what are they for? , 1979, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  J. Neiworth,et al.  Artificial Grammar Learning in Tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) in Varying Stimulus Contexts , 2017, Journal of comparative psychology.

[5]  R. Gómez,et al.  Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge , 1999, Cognition.

[6]  Carel ten Cate,et al.  Rule learning by zebra finches in an artificial grammar learning task: which rule? , 2012, Animal Cognition.

[7]  Herbert S. Terrace,et al.  Generalization of serial learning in the pigeon , 1981 .

[8]  E. Gibson,et al.  Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1973 .

[9]  M. Hauser,et al.  Segmentation of the speech stream in a non-human primate: statistical learning in cotton-top tamarins , 2001, Cognition.

[10]  Alex Kacelnik,et al.  Ducklings imprint on the relational concept of “same or different” , 2016, Science.

[11]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: an overview , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Visually Inexperienced Chicks Exhibit Spontaneous Preference for Biological Motion Patterns , 2005, PLoS biology.

[13]  N. Sutherland,et al.  Visual discrimination of orientation by octopus: mirror images. , 1960, British journal of psychology.

[14]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Domain generality versus modality specificity: the paradox of statistical learning , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  N. Sutherland,et al.  Visual discrimination by the goldfish: The orientation of rectangles , 1963 .

[16]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  H. S. Terrace,et al.  Chunking by a pigeon in a serial learning task , 1987, Nature.

[18]  R. Aslin,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article UNSUPERVISED STATISTICAL LEARNING OF HIGHER-ORDER SPATIAL STRUCTURES FROM VISUAL SCENES , 2022 .

[19]  Jessica F. Hay,et al.  Statistical learning in a natural language by 8-month-old infants. , 2009, Child development.

[20]  R A Cole,et al.  Segmenting speech into words. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Gravity bias in the interpretation of biological motion by inexperienced chicks , 2006, Current Biology.

[22]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Unsupervised statistical learning in newly hatched chicks , 2016, Current Biology.

[23]  Generalization of visual regularities in newly hatched chicks (Gallus gallus) , 2016, Animal Cognition.

[24]  Elissa L Newport,et al.  Structural packaging in the input to language learning: Contributions of prosodic and morphological marking of phrases to the acquisition of language , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  Carel ten Cate,et al.  Zebra finches can use positional and transitional cues to distinguish vocal element strings , 2015, Behavioural Processes.

[26]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Abstract Rule Learning for Visual Sequences in 8- and 11-Month-Olds. , 2009, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[27]  Carel ten Cate,et al.  Artificial grammar learning in zebra finches and human adults: XYX versus XXY , 2014, Animal Cognition.

[28]  Richard N Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning of new visual feature combinations by infants , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Kentaro Abe,et al.  Songbirds possess the spontaneous ability to discriminate syntactic rules , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  References and Notes , 2022 .

[31]  L. Regolin,et al.  EMERGENCE OF GRAMMAR AS REVEALED BY VISUAL IMPRINTING IN NEWLY-HATCHED CHICKS , 2006 .

[32]  W. Fitch,et al.  Non-adjacent visual dependency learning in chimpanzees , 2015, Animal Cognition.

[33]  Jenny R. Saffran,et al.  Constraints on Statistical Learning Across Species , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Michael Colombo,et al.  Representation of serial order in pigeons (Columba livia). , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[35]  R. Brown,et al.  A First Language , 1973 .

[36]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Lateralization of response by chicks to change in a model partner , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  J. B. Trobalon,et al.  Statistical computations over a speech stream in a rodent , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  Esther Mondragón,et al.  Rule Learning by Rats , 2008, Science.

[39]  J. Saffran The Use of Predictive Dependencies in Language Learning , 2001 .

[40]  J. M. Toro,et al.  Rule learning over consonants and vowels in a non-human animal , 2013, Cognition.

[41]  David J. Lewkowicz,et al.  Serial order processing in human infants and the role of multisensory redundancy , 2004, Cognitive Processing.

[42]  N. Sutherland Visual discrimination of orientation by octopus. , 1957, British journal of psychology.

[43]  J. Saffran Constraints on Statistical Language Learning , 2002 .

[44]  Jordan A. Comins,et al.  Perceptual categories enable pattern generalization in songbirds , 2013, Cognition.

[45]  E. Gibson Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1969 .

[46]  H. Ohki‐Hamazaki,et al.  Imprinting modulates processing of visual information in the visual wulst of chicks , 2006, BMC Neuroscience.

[47]  P. Bateson Preferences for familiarity and novelty: a model for the simultaneous development of both. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[48]  R. Aslin,et al.  Encoding multielement scenes: statistical learning of visual feature hierarchies. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[49]  E. Newport,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article INCIDENTAL LANGUAGE LEARNING: Ustening (and Learning) out of the Comer of Your Ear , 2022 .

[50]  Brock Ferguson,et al.  Communicative signals support abstract rule learning by 7-month-old infants , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[51]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Spontaneous generalization of abstract multimodal patterns in young domestic chicks , 2017, Animal Cognition.

[52]  P. Bateson THE CHARACTERISTICS AND CONTEXT OF IMPRINTING , 1966, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[53]  Steven L Franconeri,et al.  Very young infants learn abstract rules in the visual modality , 2018, PloS one.

[54]  L. Regolin,et al.  Faces are special for newly hatched chicks: evidence for inborn domain-specific mechanisms underlying spontaneous preferences for face-like stimuli. , 2009, Developmental science.

[55]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[56]  Peter M. Vishton,et al.  Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. , 1999, Science.

[57]  Ofer Tchernichovski,et al.  Statistical learning in songbirds: from self-tutoring to song culture , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[58]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism , 2002, Cognition.

[59]  Annabelle Goujon,et al.  Learning of spatial statistics in nonhuman primates: Contextual cueing in baboons (Papio papio) , 2013, Behavioural Brain Research.

[60]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Visual statistical learning in the newborn infant , 2011, Cognition.

[61]  P.P.G. Bateson,et al.  Chicks' preferences for familiar and novel conspicuous objects after different periods of exposure , 1976, Animal Behaviour.

[62]  Yukiko Kikuchi,et al.  Auditory Artificial Grammar Learning in Macaque and Marmoset Monkeys , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  H. Bleckmann,et al.  Cognitive Abilities in Malawi Cichlids (Pseudotropheus sp.): Matching-to-Sample and Image/Mirror-Image Discriminations , 2013, PloS one.

[64]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Infant Rule Learning Facilitated by Speech , 2007, Psychological science.

[65]  D. Lewkowicz Perception of serial order in infants. , 2004, Developmental science.

[66]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Origins of Knowledge: Insights from Precocial Species , 2015, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[67]  Johan J. Bolhuis,et al.  MECHANISMS OF AVIAN IMPRINTING: A REVIEW , 1991, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[68]  Richard N Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning of adjacent and nonadjacent dependencies among nonlinguistic sounds , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[69]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Modality-constrained statistical learning of tactile, visual, and auditory sequences. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[70]  C. Olson,et al.  Statistical learning of visual transitions in monkey inferotemporal cortex , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[71]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Differential involvement of right and left hemisphere in individual recognition in the domestic chick , 1994, Behavioural Processes.

[72]  G. Csibra,et al.  Action anticipation in human infants reveals assumptions about anteroposterior body-structure and action , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[73]  K. Okanoya,et al.  Statistical and Prosodic Cues for Song Segmentation Learning by Bengalese Finches (Lonchura striata var. domestica) , 2010 .

[74]  W. Tecumseh Fitch,et al.  Visual artificial grammar learning: comparative research on humans, kea (Nestor notabilis) and pigeons (Columba livia) , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[75]  M. Colombo,et al.  Representation of serial order: A comparative analysis of humans, monkeys, and pigeons , 2008, Brain Research Bulletin.

[76]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  The long road of statistical learning research: past, present and future , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[77]  Florent Meyniel,et al.  The Neural Representation of Sequences: From Transition Probabilities to Algebraic Patterns and Linguistic Trees , 2015, Neuron.

[78]  M. Hauser,et al.  Can free-ranging rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) extract artificially created rules comprised of natural vocalizations? , 2009, Journal of comparative psychology.

[79]  C. Cate,et al.  Stimulus Movement, Hen Behaviour and Filial Imprinting in Japanese Quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) , 2010 .

[80]  M. Hauser,et al.  Grammatical pattern learning by human infants and cotton-top tamarin monkeys , 2008, Cognition.

[81]  J. Delius,et al.  Discrimination of shape reflections and shape orientations by Columba livia. , 1988, Journal of comparative psychology.

[82]  N. Sutherland Visual Discrimination of Orientation and Shape by the Octopus , 1957, Nature.

[83]  Kazuo Okanoya,et al.  Revisiting the syntactic abilities of non-human animals: natural vocalizations and artificial grammar learning , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[84]  Timothy Q. Gentner,et al.  Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds , 2006, Nature.

[85]  Elisabetta Versace,et al.  The apes’ edge: positional learning in chimpanzees and humans , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[86]  Carel Ten Cate,et al.  Budgerigars and zebra finches differ in how they generalize in an artificial grammar learning experiment , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.