An Integrative Methodology for Product and Supply Chain Design Decisions at the Product Design Stage

Supplier selection is one of the key decisions in supply chain management. Companies need not only to make the "make" or "buy" decisions but also differentiate across potential suppliers in order to improve operational performance. Product design is an engineering based activity that realizes the customer requirements into functions of a new product. Many studies have pointed out that the integration of product and supply chain is a key factor for profitability and efficiency. However, most studies address supply chain performance after freezing the design of the product; only a few studies discuss when and how to incorporate supply chain decisions during product design. This paper presents a graph theory based optimization methodology to tackle this problem. The supplier selection issue is considered by evaluating its impact on both internal (e.g., ease of assembly) and external (e.g., transportation time) enterprise performances, which are aggregated as supply chain performance at the conceptual design stage. A case study in the bicycle industry demonstrates the advantages of this methodology. The presented mathematical programming formulation enables simultaneous optimization of both product design and supply chain design during the early design stages.

[1]  Kosuke Ishii,et al.  Design for variety: developing standardized and modularized product platform architectures , 2002 .

[2]  F. Wynstra,et al.  Managing supplier involvement in new product development: A multiple-case study , 2006 .

[3]  Roger Jianxin Jiao,et al.  Product family design and platform-based product development: a state-of-the-art review , 2007, J. Intell. Manuf..

[4]  M. Fisher.  What is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product , 1997 .

[5]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[6]  Samuel H. Huang,et al.  Designing supply chains: Towards theory development , 2006 .

[7]  Juha-Matti Lehtonen,et al.  Modelling in product and supply chain design: literature survey and case study , 2004 .

[8]  Nam Wook Cho,et al.  Eco-Architecture Analysis as a Method of End-of-Life Decision Making for Sustainable Product Design , 2007 .

[9]  A. Lambert.  Determining optimum disassembly sequences in electronic equipment , 2002 .

[10]  Hubert K. Rampersad,et al.  Integrated and Simultaneous Design for Robotic Assembly , 1995 .

[11]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[12]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  Modeling tradeoffs in three-dimensional concurrent engineering: a goal programming approach , 2005 .

[13]  Jianxin You,et al.  Design Quality: The Crucial Factor for Product Quality Improvement in International Production Networks , 2008, 2008 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing.

[14]  Felix T.S. Chan,et al.  Performance Measurement in a Supply Chain , 2003 .

[15]  Alfred J. D. Lambert,et al.  Optimizing disassembly processes subjected to sequence-dependent cost , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[16]  Juliana H. Mikkola,et al.  Management of Product Architecture Modularity for Mass Customization: Modeling and Theoretical Considerations , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[17]  Yu-Shan Chen,et al.  Technological innovations and industry clustering in the bicycle industry in Taiwan , 2009 .

[18]  Jan Olhager,et al.  Linking products with supply chains: testing Fisher's model , 2007 .

[19]  Richard C. M. Yam,et al.  A case study of product modularization on supply chain design and coordination in Hong Kong and China , 2005 .

[20]  S. Dowlatshahi.  Purchasing's Role in a Concurrent Engineering Environment , 1992 .

[21]  Ming-Chuan Chiu,et al.  An Investigation of the Applicability of DfX Tools during Design Concept Evolution , 2007 .

[22]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[23]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Winning at new products : accelerating the process from idea to launch , 2001 .

[24]  Ali A. Yassine,et al.  The Implications of Product Architecture on the Firm , 2007, Syst. Eng..

[25]  J. Liker,et al.  Collaborating with suppliers in product development: a US and Japan comparative study , 1999 .

[26]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Development of a Functional Basis for Design , 2000 .

[27]  Robert Stone,et al.  Capturing Creativity: Using a Design Repository to Drive Concept Innovation , 2005 .

[28]  John K. Gershenson,et al.  Product modularity: Definitions and benefits , 2003 .

[29]  Richard A. Wysk,et al.  Computer-aided manufacturing , 1991 .

[30]  Geoffrey Boothroyd,et al.  Product design for manufacture and assembly , 1994, Comput. Aided Des..

[31]  Arsen J. Darnay,et al.  Market share reporter : an annual compilation of reported market share data on companies, products, and services , 1992 .

[32]  Madara Ogot,et al.  Engineering Design: A Practical Guide , 2004 .

[33]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  Modularity as a Strategy for Supply Chain Coordination: The Case of U.S. Auto , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[34]  Juliana Hsuan Mikkola,et al.  Supply-chain integration: implications for mass customization, modularization and postponement strategies , 2004 .

[35]  Joel Sokol,et al.  Planning the Supply Chain Network for New Products: A Case Study , 2006 .

[36]  S. Fixson,et al.  The Power of Integrality: Linkages between Product Architecture, Innovation, and Industry Structure , 2007 .

[37]  Wynne Hsu,et al.  Synthesis of design concepts from a design for assembly perspective , 1998 .

[38]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Product universality and design for supply chain management , 1995 .

[39]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Beyond Make‐Buy: Internalization and Integration of Design and Production , 2005 .

[40]  M. Itoh.  Product competitive advantage and product architecture: value creation and value capture in the digital camera industry , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37574).

[41]  Gül E. Okudan,et al.  Computer-aided generation of modularised conceptual designs with assembly and variety considerations , 2008 .

[42]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Modularity in design of products and systems , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[43]  Alfred J.D. Lambert,et al.  Linear programming in disassembly/clustering sequence generation , 1999 .

[44]  S. Talluri,et al.  A Model for Strategic Supplier Selection , 2002 .

[45]  Venkat Allada,et al.  Robust supplier set selection for changing product architectures , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol..

[46]  A.J.D. Lambert.  Automatic determination of transition matrices in optimal disassembly sequence generation , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning (ISATP2001). Assembly and Disassembly in the Twenty-first Century. (Cat. No.01TH8560).

[47]  D. Lambert,et al.  Issues in Supply Chain Management , 2000 .

[48]  Gül E. Okudan Kremer,et al.  Investigation of the applicability of Design for X tools during design concept evolution: a literature review , 2011 .