A morphosyntactic decomposition of countability in Germanic

This paper contributes to our understanding of countability in two ways. First, I derive the various mass and count readings from the interaction between two syntactic features, viz. [Div] (which creates countable items, cf. Borer 2005) and [Size] (which creates units). Second, I show how crosslinguistic variation in the expression of countability can be reduced to whether [Div] and [Size] each head their own projection or are combined on a single syntactic head (cf. Thráinsson 1996; Bobaljik and Thráinsson, Syntax, 1: 37-71, 1998). Finally, I discuss the various Germanic morphemes that can realize the [Size] feature.

[1]  H. V. Riemsdijk,et al.  Silent nouns and the spurious indefinite article in Dutch , 2005 .

[2]  Heidi Harley,et al.  State-of-the-Article: Distributed Morphology , 1999 .

[3]  H S Terrace,et al.  Representation of the numerosities 1-9 by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[4]  Olga Steriopolo.  Form and Function of Expressive Morphology: A Case Study of Russian * , 2008 .

[5]  Amàlia Llombart-Huesca,et al.  Anaphoric one and NP-ellipsis , 2002 .

[6]  Fabio Pianesi,et al.  Tense and Aspect: From Semantics to Morphosyntax , 1997 .

[7]  Morris Halle,et al.  Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection , 1993 .

[8]  Henry Allan Gleason,et al.  Linguistics And English Grammar , 1965 .

[9]  H. V. Riemsdijk,et al.  Why should diminutives count , 2005 .

[10]  Geert Booij,et al.  The Morphology of Dutch , 2002 .

[12]  Susan Rothstein,et al.  Counting and the Mass/Count Distinction , 2010, J. Semant..

[13]  Francis Jeffry Pelletier,et al.  Mass Terms: Some Philosophical Problems , 1980 .

[14]  Gregory Norman Carlson,et al.  Reference to kinds in English , 1977 .

[15]  T. Sato,et al.  Relative quantity judgment by Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[16]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  The importance of shape in early lexical learning , 1988 .

[17]  A. Marantz.  Phases and words , 2007 .

[18]  András Kornai,et al.  THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF NOUN PHRASES , 1985 .

[19]  Francis Jeffry Pelletier.  Non-singular reference: some preliminaries , 1975 .

[20]  J. Carlos.  Languages of the Mind , 1995 .

[21]  A. Lobeck.  Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing, and Identification , 1995 .

[22]  Randi Reppen,et al.  Grammar and Beyond , 2012 .

[23]  I. Pepperberg.  Grey Parrot (Psittacus erithacus) numerical abilities: addition and further experiments on a zero-like concept. , 2006, Journal of comparative psychology.

[24]  W. Roberts,et al.  Summation of symbols by pigeons (Columba livia): the importance of number and mass of reward items. , 2000, Journal of comparative psychology.

[25]  J. Doetjes.  Quantifiers and Selection. On the Distribution of Quantifying Expressions in French, Dutch and English , 1997 .

[26]  M. Jitsumori,et al.  Counting absolute numbers of items, from 1 to 8, in pigeons , 2009, Learning & behavior.

[27]  W A Roberts,et al.  Summation of symbols by pigeons (Columba livia): the importance of number and mass of reward items. , 2000, Journal of comparative psychology.

[28]  J. Bobaljik,et al.  Two Heads Aren’t Always Better Than One , 2002 .

[29]  Höskuldur Thráinsson.  On the (Non-) Universality of Functional Categories , 1996 .

[30]  H. Borer.  In name only , 2005 .

[31]  H. V. Riemsdijk.  Categorial feature magnetism: The endocentricity and distribution of projections , 1998 .