Effects of Clustering Coefficient on Spoken Word Recognition 1

Since the late 1960’s, researchers have explored how the structure of the mental lexicon affects spoken word recognition. The proposal that words are recognized relationally in the context of other words in lexical memory has encouraged the use of complex systems to describe connectivity in both the phonological and semantic lexicon. The present study assessed the role of the graph theoretical measure of Clustering Coefficient (CC) using two experimental paradigms: same-different discrimination, and perceptual identification to explore how global lexical variables affect spoken word recognition. In Experiment 1, listeners judged whether two words were the same or different. Longer response latencies were obtained for high CC words than low CC words. In Experiment 2, the stimuli were processed with an 8-channel noise vocoder to degrade the signal and a new group of listeners also performed the same-different task. In contrast to findings obtained in Experiment 1, listeners discriminated high CC words more accurately than low CC words. In Experiment 3, an open-set perceptual identification task was carried out to examine correct and incorrect responses using 8, 10 and 12 channels. Listeners identified low CC words more accurately than high CC words in the 10 and 12 channel conditions, but not in the 8-channel condition. Detailed analysis of the incorrect responses revealed that listeners used different perceptual strategies as the number of channels increased. These results suggest that global, emergent factors reflecting the structural organization and connectivity of words in the mental lexicon affect spoken word recognition and should be included in current models of spoken word recognition and lexical access.

[1]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  W. Marslen-Wilson Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition , 1987, Cognition.

[3]  Brian W. Eukel Phonotactic basis for word frequency effects: Implications for lexical distance metrics , 1980 .

[4]  T. Landauer,et al.  Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition , 1973 .

[5]  R. L. Trask,et al.  语音学和音系学词典 = A dictionary of phonetics and phonology , 1993 .

[6]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[7]  Louis J. Gerstman,et al.  Word Frequency Effects in Learning Unknown Message Sets , 1960 .

[8]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Function and process in spoken word recognition: A tutorial review , 1984 .

[9]  Michael S Vitevitch,et al.  A Web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[10]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  The Large-Scale Structure of Semantic Networks: Statistical Analyses and a Model of Semantic Growth , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  W. F. Hawkins,et al.  Vexierversuch: the log relationship between word-frequency and recognition obtained in the absence of stimulus words. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior , 1959 .

[13]  Athanassios Protopapas Connectionist modeling of speech perception , 1999 .

[14]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access , 1991 .

[15]  Michel Treisman,et al.  Space or lexicon? The word frequency effect and the error response frequency effect , 1978 .

[16]  R. C. Oldfield Things, Words and the Brain* , 1966, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  D. Crystal,et al.  语言学和语音学基础词典 = A first dictionary of linguistics and phonetics , 1980 .

[18]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Modeling the Mental Lexicon as a Complex System: Some Preliminary Results Using Graph Theoretic Measures 1 , 2005 .

[19]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.

[20]  H. H. Clark The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[21]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Intelligibility of Known and Unknown Message Sets , 1959 .

[22]  D. Howes On the Relation between the Intelligibility and Frequency of Occurrence of English Words , 1957 .

[23]  John Morton,et al.  Structures and processes , 1979 .

[24]  P. Luce,et al.  Probabilistic Phonotactics and Neighborhood Activation in Spoken Word Recognition , 1999 .

[25]  Irwin Pollack,et al.  Analysis of Incorrect Responses to an Unknown Message Set , 1960 .

[26]  P. Luce,et al.  When Words Compete: Levels of Processing in Perception of Spoken Words , 1998 .

[27]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[28]  Michael S. Vitevitch,et al.  Phonotactic and metrical influences on adult ratings of spoken nonsense words , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.

[29]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[30]  H. Savin Word‐Frequency Effect and Errors in the Perception of Speech , 1963 .