Development of a decision aid for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit employing user-centered design and a wiki platform for rapid prototyping

Background Upon admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), all patients should discuss their goals of care and express their wishes concerning life-sustaining interventions (e.g., cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)). Without such discussions, interventions that prolong life at the cost of decreasing its quality may be used without appropriate guidance from patients. Objectives To adapt an existing decision aid about CPR to create a wiki-based decision aid individually adapted to each patient’s risk factors; and to document the use of a wiki platform for this purpose. Methods We conducted three weeks of ethnographic observation in our ICU to observe intensivists and patients discussing goals of care and to identify their needs regarding decision making. We interviewed intensivists individually. Then we conducted three rounds of rapid prototyping involving 15 patients and 11 health professionals. We recorded and analyzed all discussions, interviews and comments, and collected sociodemographic data. Using a wiki, a website that allows multiple users to contribute or edit content, we adapted the decision aid accordingly and added the Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation (GO-FAR) prediction rule calculator. Results We added discussion of invasive mechanical ventilation. The final decision aid comprises values clarification, risks and benefits of CPR and invasive mechanical ventilation, statistics about CPR, and a synthesis section. We added the GO-FAR prediction calculator as an online adjunct to the decision aid. Although three rounds of rapid prototyping simplified the information in the decision aid, 60% (n = 3/5) of the patients involved in the last cycle still did not understand its purpose. Conclusions Wikis and user-centered design can be used to adapt decision aids to users’ needs and local contexts. Our wiki platform allows other centers to adapt our tools, reducing duplication and accelerating scale-up. Physicians need training in shared decision making skills about goals of care and in using the decision aid. A video version of the decision aid could clarify its purpose.

[1]  P Kinnersley,et al.  Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. , 2000, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[2]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Negotiating Tensions Between Theory and Design in the Development of Mailings for People Recovering From Acute Coronary Syndrome , 2017, JMIR human factors.

[3]  D. Heyland,et al.  Strategies for effective goals of care discussions and decision-making: perspectives from a multi-centre survey of Canadian hospital-based healthcare providers , 2015, BMC Palliative Care.

[4]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. , 2000, Spine.

[5]  M. Murray,et al.  Interventions for shared decision-making about life support in the intensive care unit: a systematic review. , 2013, Worldviews on evidence-based nursing.

[6]  Holly O Witteman,et al.  User-centered design and the development of patient decision aids: protocol for a systematic review , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[7]  M. Faber,et al.  Wikis to facilitate patient participation in developing information leaflets: first experiences , 2014, Informatics for health & social care.

[8]  Sharon E Straus,et al.  WikiBuild: A New Online Collaboration Process For Multistakeholder Tool Development and Consensus Building , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[9]  M. Ebell,et al.  Development and validation of the Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation (GO-FAR) score to predict neurologically intact survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. , 2013, JAMA internal medicine.

[10]  M. Meade,et al.  Mortality associated with withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a Canadian multicentre cohort study , 2011, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[11]  France Légaré,et al.  Wikis and Collaborative Writing Applications in Health Care: A Scoping Review , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[12]  D. Cook,et al.  The Very Elderly Admitted to ICU: A Quality Finish?* , 2015, Critical care medicine.

[13]  L. Faulkner Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[14]  D. White,et al.  Shared Decision Making in ICUs: An American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement , 2016, Critical care medicine.

[15]  D. Heyland,et al.  Mind the gap: Opportunities for improving end-of-life care for patients with advanced heart failure. , 2009, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[16]  P. Archambault WikiBuild: A New Application to Support Patient and Health Care Professional Involvement in the Development of Patient Support Tools , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[17]  F. Légaré,et al.  Development of a decision guide to support the elderly in decision making about location of care: an iterative, user-centered design , 2016, Research Involvement and Engagement.

[18]  Aileen Clarke,et al.  Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  M. Ebell,et al.  Development of a Decision Aid for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Involving Intensive Care Unit Patients' and Health Professionals' Participation Using User-Centered Design and a Wiki Platform for Rapid Prototyping: A Research Protocol , 2016, JMIR research protocols.

[20]  L. Mbuagbaw,et al.  Communication Tools for End-of-Life Decision-Making in Ambulatory Care Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2016, PloS one.

[21]  M. Meade,et al.  Nonbeneficial Treatment Canada: Definitions, Causes, and Potential Solutions From the Perspective of Healthcare Practitioners* , 2015, Critical care medicine.

[22]  J. Vincent,et al.  Ethics and end-of-life care for adults in the intensive care unit , 2010, The Lancet.

[23]  Matt Vassar,et al.  Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions an Overview of Ethnography in Healthcare and Medical Education Research , 2022 .