Challenges and opportunities in the high-resolution cryo-EM visualization of microtubules and their binding partners.

As non-crystallizable polymers, microtubules have been the target of cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) studies since the technique was first established. Over the years, image processing strategies have been developed that take care of the unique, pseudo-helical symmetry of the microtubule. With recent progress in data quality and data processing, cryo-EM reconstructions are now reaching resolutions that allow the generation of atomic models of microtubules and the factors that bind them. These include cellular partners that contribute to microtubule cellular functions, or small ligands that interfere with those functions in the treatment of cancer. The stage is set to generate a family portrait for all identified microtubule interacting proteins and to use cryo-EM as a drug development tool in the targeting of tubulin.

[1]  Edward H Egelman,et al.  The iterative helical real space reconstruction method: surmounting the problems posed by real polymers. , 2007, Journal of structural biology.

[2]  E. Nogales,et al.  Structural differences between yeast and mammalian microtubules revealed by cryo-EM , 2017, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  E. Nogales,et al.  Refined structure of alpha beta-tubulin at 3.5 A resolution. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Anthony A. Hyman,et al.  One-step purification of assembly-competent tubulin from diverse eukaryotic sources , 2012, Molecular biology of the cell.

[5]  Eva Nogales,et al.  A new protocol to accurately determine microtubule lattice seam location. , 2015, Journal of structural biology.

[6]  Gergő Bohner,et al.  EBs Recognize a Nucleotide-Dependent Structural Cap at Growing Microtubule Ends , 2012, Cell.

[7]  E. Nogales,et al.  Near-atomic cryo-EM structure of PRC1 bound to the microtubule , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Kenneth H. Downing,et al.  Insights into the Distinct Mechanisms of Action of Taxane and Non-Taxane Microtubule Stabilizers from Cryo-EM Structures. , 2017, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  E. Nogales,et al.  Visualizing microtubule structural transitions and interactions with associated proteins. , 2016, Current opinion in structural biology.

[10]  A. Desai,et al.  Orientation and structure of the Ndc80 complex on the microtubule lattice , 2008, The Journal of cell biology.

[11]  E. Nogales.  Structural insights into microtubule function. , 2000, Annual review of biochemistry.

[12]  E. Egelman.  A robust algorithm for the reconstruction of helical filaments using single-particle methods. , 2000, Ultramicroscopy.

[13]  R. Wade,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of functional motor proteins on microtubules , 1996, Current Biology.

[14]  D. Baker,et al.  High-Resolution Microtubule Structures Reveal the Structural Transitions in αβ-Tubulin upon GTP Hydrolysis , 2014, Cell.

[15]  M. Steinmetz,et al.  Molecular Mechanism of Action of Microtubule-Stabilizing Anticancer Agents , 2013, Science.

[16]  E. Nogales,et al.  Multi-modal microtubule binding by the Ndc80 kinetochore complex , 2012, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[17]  E. Nogales,et al.  Mechanistic Origin of Microtubule Dynamic Instability and Its Modulation by EB Proteins , 2015, Cell.

[18]  M. Steinmetz,et al.  Structural basis of microtubule stabilization by laulimalide and peloruside A. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[19]  Scott Forth,et al.  Mutations in Human Tubulin Proximal to the Kinesin-Binding Site Alter Dynamic Instability at Microtubule Plus- and Minus-Ends. , 2016, Developmental cell.

[20]  D. Clare,et al.  Template-free 13-protofilament microtubule–MAP assembly visualized at 8 Å resolution , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[21]  E. Nogales,et al.  The Ndc80 kinetochore complex forms oligomeric arrays along microtubules , 2010, Nature.

[22]  Christopher P. Arthur,et al.  Insights into Antiparallel Microtubule Crosslinking by PRC1, a Conserved Nonmotor Microtubule Binding Protein , 2010, Cell.

[23]  Kenneth H. Downing,et al.  Structure of the αβ tubulin dimer by electron crystallography , 1998, Nature.

[24]  C. Moores,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of Single-isoform Recombinant Neuronal Human Tubulin*♦ , 2016, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  D. Baker,et al.  Refinement of protein structures into low-resolution density maps using rosetta. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  M. Magiera,et al.  Post-translational modifications of tubulin , 2014, Current Biology.

[27]  G. Lander,et al.  Multivalent Microtubule Recognition by Tubulin Tyrosine Ligase-like Family Glutamylases , 2015, Cell.

[28]  Kenneth H Downing,et al.  An atomic-level mechanism for activation of the kinesin molecular motors , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  William V Nicholson,et al.  Microtubule structure at 8 A resolution. , 2002, Structure.

[30]  K. Hirose,et al.  Three-dimensional cryoelectron microscopy of 16-protofilament microtubules: structure, polarity, and interaction with motor proteins. , 1997, Journal of structural biology.

[31]  K. Downing,et al.  The Beginning of Kinesin's Force-Generating Cycle Visualized at 9 Angstrom Resolution , 2007 .

[32]  R. Milligan,et al.  Structural comparison of the Caenorhabditis elegans and human Ndc80 complexes bound to microtubules reveals distinct binding behavior , 2016, Molecular biology of the cell.

[33]  David Baker,et al.  High-resolution comparative modeling with RosettaCM. , 2013, Structure.

[34]  Andreas Hoenger,et al.  A Model for the Microtubule-Ncd Motor Protein Complex Obtained by Cryo-Electron Microscopy and Image Analysis , 1997, Cell.