Primary standards for measuring flow rates from 100 nl/min to 1 ml/min – gravimetric principle

Abstract Microflow and nanoflow rate calibrations are important in several applications such as liquid chromatography, (scaled-down) process technology, and special health-care applications. However, traceability in the microflow and nanoflow range does not go below 16 μl/min in Europe. Furthermore, the European metrology organization EURAMET did not yet validate this traceability by means of an intercomparison between different National Metrology Institutes (NMIs). The NMIs METAS, Centre Technique des Industries Aérauliques et Thermiques, IPQ, Danish Technological Institute, and VSL have therefore developed and validated primary standards to cover the flow rate range from 0.1 μl/min to at least 1 ml/min. In this article, we describe the different designs and methods of the primary standards of the gravimetric principle and the results obtained at the intercomparison for the upper flow rate range for the various NMIs and Bronkhorst High-Tech, the manufacturer of the transfer standards used.

[1]  P. Lucas,et al.  Realizing primary reference values in the nanoflow regime, a proof of principle , 2010 .

[2]  James T. Webber,et al.  Nanoflow low pressure high peak capacity single dimension LC-MS/MS platform for high-throughput, in-depth analysis of mammalian proteomes. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[3]  Eduarda Filipe,et al.  UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION IN GRAVIMETRIC MICROFLOW MEASUREMENTS , 2015 .

[4]  J. Brandner.  Fabrication of Microreactors Made from Metals and Ceramics , 2008 .

[5]  Peter Lucas,et al.  Primary standard for liquid flow rates between 30 and 1500 nl/min based on volume expansion , 2015, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[6]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[7]  S. Klein,et al.  Design and uncertainty assessment of a setup for calibration of microfluidic devices down to 5 nL min−1 , 2013 .

[8]  R F Martin,et al.  General deming regression for estimating systematic bias and its confidence interval in method-comparison studies. , 2000, Clinical chemistry.

[9]  Remco J. Wiegerink,et al.  Compact Mass Flow Meter Based on a Micro Coriolis Flow Sensor , 2013, Micromachines.

[10]  M. Cox.  The evaluation of key comparison data , 2002 .

[11]  Remco J. Wiegerink,et al.  Modeling, design, fabrication and characterization of a micro Coriolis mass flow sensor , 2010 .

[12]  Maurice G. Cox,et al.  The evaluation of key comparison data: determining the largest consistent subset , 2007 .

[13]  H. Bissig,et al.  MICRO FLOW FACILITY FOR TRACEABILITY IN STEADY AND PULSATING FLOW , 2015 .

[14]  Ellis Meng,et al.  Micromachined Thermal Flow Sensors - A Review , 2012, Micromachines.

[15]  Peter Lucas,et al.  Metrology for drug delivery , 2015, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[16]  Alistair B. Forbes,et al.  Software Support for Metrology Best Practice Guide No. 4 , 2007 .