Bandwidth and Echo: Trust, Information, and Gossip in Social Networks

There are two schools of thought on how network structures create the competitive advantage known as social capital. One school focuses on the advantages of closure. A network is closed to the extent that people in it are connected by strong relationships. Typical forms of closure are dense networks in which everyone is connected to everyone else, and hierarchical networks in which people are connected indirectly through mutual relations with a few leaders at the center of the network. Both forms provide numerous communication channels, which facilitates the enforcement of sanctions against misbehavior. Closure lowers the risk of trust, and so facilitates collaborative efforts that require trust. A second school of thought focuses on the advantages of brokerage. Markets and organizations are assumed to be a network of interdependent groups in which information flows at higher velocity within than between groups such that separate groups come to know about different things. Boundaries between groups define holes in social structure, “structural holes,”

[1]  L. Festinger,et al.  Social pressures in informal groups , 1950 .

[2]  F. Heider The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[3]  Stewart Macaulay Non-contractual relations in business: a preliminary study , 1963 .

[4]  M. Gluckman,et al.  Papers in Honor of Melville J. Herskovits: Gossip and Scandal , 1963, Current Anthropology.

[5]  P. Blau Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[6]  A. Tesser,et al.  On reluctance to communicate undesirable information: The MUM effect. , 1970 .

[7]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  L. Kish,et al.  Inference from Complex Samples , 1974 .

[9]  Michael Mulkay,et al.  Social Exchange Theory , 1975 .

[10]  H. Grice Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[11]  D. Myers,et al.  The group polarization phenomenon. , 1976 .

[12]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The Effect of Uncertainty on the Use of Social Influence in Organizational Decision Making. , 1976 .

[13]  S. Feld The Focused Organization of Social Ties , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  L. Ross,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Shortcomings in the attribution process: On the origins and maintenance of erroneous social assessments , 1982 .

[15]  R. Burt Toward a structural theory of action , 1982 .

[16]  D. H. Mills The Logic and Limits of Trust , 1983 .

[17]  Wayne E. Baker,et al.  The Social Structure of a National Securities Market , 1984, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  D. Isenberg Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. , 1986 .

[19]  L. Zucker Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. , 1986 .

[20]  G. Fine The Social Organization of Adolescent Gossip: The Rhetoric of Moral Evaluation , 1986 .

[21]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Behavior in escalation situations: Antecedents, prototypes, and solutions. , 1987 .

[22]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Accuracy in interpersonal perception: a social relations analysis. , 1987, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  R. Burt Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  T. Gilovich,et al.  Secondhand information and social judgment , 1987 .

[25]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[26]  Helmut Lamm,et al.  A Review of Our Research on Group Polarization: Eleven Experiments on the Effects of Group Discussion on Risk Acceptance, Probability Estimation, and Negotiation Positions , 1988 .

[27]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  Jeffrey L. Bradach,et al.  Price, Authority, and Trust: From Ideal Types to Plural Forms , 1989 .

[29]  A. Greif Reputation and Coalitions in Medieval Trade: Evidence on the Maghribi Traders , 1989, The Journal of Economic History.

[30]  J. Coleman Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[31]  David M. Kreps Corporate culture and economic theory , 1990 .

[32]  A. Stinchcombe Information and Organizations , 2019 .

[33]  P. Bonacich,et al.  The effect of network density and homogeneity on attitude polarization , 1990 .

[34]  W. Raub,et al.  Reputation and Efficiency in Social Interactions: An Example of Network Effects , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[35]  R. Eccles,et al.  Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action , 1992 .

[36]  R. Gibbons Game theory for applied economists , 1992 .

[37]  R. Taormina,et al.  Group polarization on business decisions in Singapore , 1992 .

[38]  Ananth V. Iyer,et al.  Information networks and market behavior , 1992 .

[39]  E. Higgins Achieving 'Shared Reality' in the Communication Game: A Social Action That Create; Meaning , 1992 .

[40]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  The network structure of management roles in a large matrix firm , 1992 .

[41]  D. Nyberg The varnished truth , 1993 .

[42]  D. Black The social structure of right and wrong , 1993 .

[43]  J. Barker Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams , 1993 .

[44]  P. Borgna,et al.  Smelser, Neil J. , 1993 .

[45]  John Clair Thompson The Structure of Corporate Political Action: Interfirm Relations and Their Consequences , 1993 .

[46]  TOWARD A THEORY OF THE THIRD PARTY , 1993 .

[47]  R. Putnam Making Democracy Work , 1993 .

[48]  Edward J. Lawler,et al.  Power and the Emergence of Commitment Behavior in Negotiated Exchange , 1993 .

[49]  A. Greif Contract Enforceability and Economic Institutions in Early Trade: the Maghribi Traders' Coalition , 1993 .

[50]  Barry R. Weingast,et al.  Coordination, Commitment, and Enforcement: The Case of the Merchant Guild , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[51]  P. Kollock The Emergence of Exchange Structures: An Experimental Study of Uncertainty, Commitment, and Trust , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[52]  Diego Gambetta Godfather's gossip , 1994, European Journal of Sociology.

[53]  Cas Wouters,et al.  The Established and the Outsiders , 1994 .

[54]  N. Smelser,et al.  Handbook of Economic Sociology , 1994 .

[55]  Kazuo Yamaguchi,et al.  The flow of information through social networks: diagonal-free measures of inefficiency and the structural determinants of inefficiency , 1994 .

[56]  C. Judd,et al.  The effects of repeated expressions on attitude polarization during group discussions. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[57]  Donald Black,et al.  The Epistemology of Pure Sociology , 1995, Law & Social Inquiry.

[58]  R. Gulati Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis , 1995 .

[59]  J. Klayman Varieties of Confirmation Bias , 1995 .

[60]  R. Burt,et al.  Kinds of Third-Party Effects on Trust , 1995 .

[61]  Baron,et al.  Social Corroboration and Opinion Extremity , 1996, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[62]  Richard Swedberg,et al.  Explorations in Economic Sociology , 1996 .

[63]  David Krackhardt,et al.  COMMENT ON BURT AND KNEZ'S THIRD-PARTY EFFECTS ON TRUST , 1996 .

[64]  Robin I. M. Dunbar Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language , 1996 .

[65]  R. Burt,et al.  Trust and third-party gossip. , 1996 .

[66]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[67]  薄葉 毅史,et al.  The Established and the Outsiders : A Sociological Enquiry into Community Problems. By Norbert Elias and John L. Scotson, 1994(First Edition 1965) Sage Publications. , 1997 .

[68]  A. Nauta,et al.  The executive way: conflict management in corporations , 1997 .

[69]  R. Burt The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[70]  Johan Hoogstraten,et al.  Situational determinants of the acceptability of telling lies. , 1997 .

[71]  W. E. Watkins,et al.  Information processing and organizational structure , 1998 .

[72]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Social Networks and Perceptions of Intergroup Conflict: The Role of Negative Relationships and Third Parties , 1998 .

[73]  R. Burt THE GENDER OF SOCIAL CAPITAL , 1998 .

[74]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Personality correlates of structural holes , 1998 .

[75]  V. Buskens The social structure of trust , 1998 .

[76]  A. Portes Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[77]  M. Macy,et al.  The evolution of trust and cooperation between strangers: A computational model. , 1998 .

[78]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  Socially Embedded Consumer Transactions: For What Kinds of Purchases Do People Most Often Use Networks? , 1998 .

[79]  Rafael Wittek,et al.  Gossip in Organizations , 1998, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[80]  W. Raub,et al.  REVOLUTION AND RISK , 1998 .

[81]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Relationships and Unethical Behavior: A Social Network Perspective , 1998 .

[82]  Edward J. Lawler,et al.  Network structure and emotion in exchange relations , 1998 .

[83]  Vincent Buskens,et al.  9. A New Model for Information Diffusion in Heterogeneous Social Networks , 1999 .

[84]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[85]  R. Burt The Social Capital of Opinion Leaders , 1999 .

[86]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[87]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Cooperative or Controlling? The Effects of CEO-Board Relations and the Content of Interlocks on the Formation of Joint Ventures , 1999 .

[88]  R. Burt The Network Structure Of Social Capital , 2000 .

[89]  Jeroen Weesie,et al.  AN EXPERIMENT ON THE EFFECTS OF EMBEDDEDNESS IN TRUST SITUATIONS , 2000 .

[90]  W. Powell,et al.  Networks and Economic life , 2003 .