A model-driven approach for representing clinical archetypes for Semantic Web environments

The life-long clinical information of any person supported by electronic means configures his Electronic Health Record (EHR). This information is usually distributed among several independent and heterogeneous systems that may be syntactically or semantically incompatible. There are currently different standards for representing and exchanging EHR information among different systems. In advanced EHR approaches, clinical information is represented by means of archetypes. Most of these approaches use the Archetype Definition Language (ADL) to specify archetypes. However, ADL has some drawbacks when attempting to perform semantic activities in Semantic Web environments. In this work, Semantic Web technologies are used to specify clinical archetypes for advanced EHR architectures. The advantages of using the Ontology Web Language (OWL) instead of ADL are described and discussed in this work. Moreover, a solution combining Semantic Web and Model-driven Engineering technologies is proposed to transform ADL into OWL for the CEN EN13606 EHR architecture.

[1]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  Knowledge Representation with Ontologies: The Present and Future , 2004, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[2]  Werner Ceusters,et al.  An Ontology-Based Methodology for the Migration of Biomedical Terminologies to Electronic Health Records , 2005, AMIA.

[3]  Guy Doumeingts,et al.  Enterprise Interoperability: New Challenges and Approaches , 2007 .

[4]  Omolola Ogunyemi,et al.  GLIF3: a representation format for sharable computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines , 2004, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[5]  Fabiane Bizinella Nardon,et al.  Knowledge Sharing and Information Integration in Healthcare using Ontologies and Deductive Databases , 2004, MedInfo.

[6]  Yildiray Kabak,et al.  Artemis: Deploying semantically enriched Web services in the healthcare domain , 2006, Inf. Syst..

[7]  A. Rector Clinical Terminology: Why Is it so Hard? , 1999, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[8]  Barry Smith,et al.  From concepts to clinical reality: An essay on the benchmarking of biomedical terminologies , 2006, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[9]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Methodologies for Ontology-based Semantic Translations – Heiner Stuckenschmidt , 2001 .

[10]  M. Eichelberg,et al.  Electronic Health Record Standards - A Brief Overview , 2006, 2006 ITI 4th International Conference on Information & Communications Technology.

[11]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Determining Semantic Similarity among Entity Classes from Different Ontologies , 2003, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[12]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web" in Scientific American , 2001 .

[13]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Approaching OWL and MDA Through Technological Spaces , 2004 .

[14]  C. Angulo,et al.  Archetype-Based Semantic Integration and Standardization of Clinical Data , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  Philip Resnik,et al.  Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy: An Information-Based Measure and its Application to Problems of Ambiguity in Natural Language , 1999, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[16]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[17]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  The GRAIL concept modelling language for medical terminology , 1997, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[18]  Jacky Estublier,et al.  SEEMP: An Semantic Interoperability Infrastructure for e-Government Services in the Employment Sector , 2007, ESWC.

[19]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[20]  Stefan Schulz,et al.  Part-whole representation and reasoning in formal biomedical ontologies , 2005, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[21]  Jean Bézivin,et al.  Technological Spaces: An Initial Appraisal , 2002 .

[22]  B G M E Blobel,et al.  Advanced EHR Architectures–Promises or Reality , 2006, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[23]  Chris Partridge,et al.  The Role of Ontology in Semantic Integration , 2002 .

[24]  W R Hogan,et al.  Common medical terminology comes of age, Part One: Standard language improves healthcare quality. , 2001, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[25]  T Beale,et al.  Archetypes: Constraint-based Domain Models for Future-proof Information Systems , 2000, OOPSLA 2000.

[26]  Jesualdo Tomás Fernández-Breis,et al.  A cooperative framework for integrating ontologies , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[27]  Huajun Chen,et al.  The Semantic Web , 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[28]  L. Ohno-Machado Journal of Biomedical Informatics , 2001 .

[29]  Asuman Dogac,et al.  Mapping Archetypes to OWL ∗ , 2005 .

[30]  Jesús Sánchez Cuadrado,et al.  RubyTL: A Practical, Extensible Transformation Language , 2006, ECMDA-FA.

[31]  Bob J. Wielinga,et al.  Using explicit ontologies in KBS development , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[32]  Sebastian Garde,et al.  Towards Semantic Interoperability for Electronic Health Records , 2007, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[33]  Jim Steel,et al.  MOF QVT final adopted specification: meta object facility (MOF) 2.0 query/view/transformation specification. , 2005 .

[34]  W C Ivan Herman The Vision of the Semantic Web , 2007 .