An Integrated FAHP-PROMETHEE Approach For Selecting The Best Flexible Manufacturing System

This paper proposes an integrated approach to the decision-making problem that combines the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) with the purpose of Evaluation of Flexible Manufacturing Systems with a Group Decision Support System (GDSS). The FAHP is used to determine the weights for each criterion and PROMETHEE is applied to get the final ranking and GAIA plane is used to highlight the conflicts, the similarities and independences among the criteria and the DMs. Finally, a numerical example proposed in this paper determines the most appropriate FMS alternative.

[1]  Mario T. Tabucanon,et al.  Decision support system for multicriteria machine selection for flexible manufacturing systems , 1994 .

[2]  Wen-Chieh Chou,et al.  Application of fuzzy theory and PROMETHEE technique to evaluate suitable ecotechnology method: A case study in Shihmen Reservoir Watershed, Taiwan , 2007 .

[3]  Mario T. Tabucanon,et al.  A multiple-criteria approach to machine selection for flexible manufacturing systems , 1994 .

[4]  Juan Carlos Leyva López,et al.  A new method for group decision support based on ELECTRE III methodology , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  A PREFERENCE RANKING ORGANIZATION METHOD , 1985 .

[6]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  DEPENDENCE OF MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION RESULT ON CHOICE OF PREFERENCE FUNCTIONS AND THEIR PARAMETERS , 2010 .

[7]  Heracles Polatidis,et al.  Renewable energy projects: structuring a multi-criteria group decision-making framework , 2003 .

[8]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  Decision Making in Manufacturing Environment Using Graph Theory and Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods , 2013 .

[9]  Ching-Chow Yang,et al.  KEY QUALITY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION USING FUZZY AHP , 2004 .

[10]  J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[11]  Roger N. Wabalickis Justification of FMS with the analytic hierarchy process , 1988 .

[12]  Ozden Bayazit,et al.  Use of AHP in decision‐making for flexible manufacturing systems , 2005 .

[13]  Reza Baradaran Kazemzadeh,et al.  PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Emanuel Samouilidis,et al.  Project Ranking in the Armenian Energy Sector Using a Multicriteria Method for Groups , 2003, Ann. Oper. Res..

[15]  Y.-D. Kim,et al.  Impact of throughput-based objectives and machine grouping decisions on the short-term performance of flexible manufacturing systems , 1997 .

[16]  Markku Kuula A risk management model for FMS selection decisions: a multiple-criteria decision-making approach , 1993 .

[17]  Serkan Balli,et al.  Operating System Selection Using Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS Methods , 2009 .

[18]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  Distance-based fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating flexible manufacturing system alternatives , 2002 .

[19]  Grit Walther,et al.  Evaluation of sites for the location of WEEE recycling plants in Spain. , 2008, Waste management.

[20]  B. Mareschal,et al.  Nuclear waste management: An application of the multicriteria PROMETHEE methods , 1990 .

[21]  W. A. Meinhart,et al.  Selecting a flexible manufacturing system— A strategic approach , 1994 .

[22]  Metin Dagdeviren,et al.  Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE , 2008, J. Intell. Manuf..

[23]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  Evaluating flexible manufacturing systems using a combined multiple attribute decision making method , 2008 .

[24]  Thomas L. Saaty Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory , 2000 .

[25]  Adiel Teixeira de Almeida,et al.  Group decision-making for leakage management strategy of water network , 2007 .

[26]  Gérard Colson,et al.  The OR's prize winner and the software ARGOS: how a multijudge and multicriteria ranking GDSS helps a jury to attribute a scientific award , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[27]  Cathy Macharis,et al.  THE STRATEGIC EVALUATION OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES THROUGH MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS: THE ADVISORS CASE. IN: ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS: INNOVATIONS AND CASE STUDIES , 2004 .

[28]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  A decision-making framework model for evaluating flexible manufacturing systems using digraph and matrix methods , 2006 .

[29]  H Md Azamathulla,et al.  ANFIS-based approach for the estimation of transverse mixing coefficient. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[30]  C. Kahraman,et al.  Multi-attribute comparison of advanced manufacturing systems using fuzzy vs. crisp axiomatic design approach , 2005 .

[31]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  A unified framework for the selection of a Flexible Manufacturing System , 1995 .

[32]  Jon Erickson,et al.  Collaborative environmental planning in river management: an application of multicriteria decision analysis in the White River Watershed in Vermont. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[33]  Bertrand Mareschal,et al.  The GDSS PROMETHEE procedure: a PROMETHEE-GAIA based procedure for group decision support , 1998 .

[34]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[35]  Armando Blanco,et al.  Constructing linguistic versions for the multicriteria decision support systems preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation I and II , 2003, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[36]  L. Duckstein,et al.  Multicriterion Analysis for Sustainable Water Resources Planning: A Case Study in Spain , 2000 .