The Roles of Theory in Canonical Action Research

Canonical action research (CAR) aims to address real-world problems and improve organizational performance by combining scholarly observations with practical interventions. However, efforts to conduct CAR have revealed challenges that reflect a significant research-practice gap. We examine these challenges by revisiting the process, principles, and criteria of CAR developed earlier. The specific roles of two different types of theory in the cyclical action research process are considered. A project undertaken in two public relations firms illustrates how our methodological revision improves the rigor and quality of CAR. This article contributes both a significantly enhanced action research method, with detailed guidelines and suggestions that emphasize the roles of focal and instrumental theories, and an emerging theory of knowledge sharing that incorporates key elements of Chinese management and culture.

[1]  Mitchell H. Tsai,et al.  F1000Prime recommendation of When Should a Process Be Art, Not Science? , 2009 .

[2]  D. Wegner.  Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[3]  D. Hambrick.  THE FIELD OF MANAGEMENT'S DEVOTION TO THEORY: TOO MUCH OF A GOOD THING? , 2007 .

[4]  Øystein D. Fjeldstad,et al.  CONFIGURING VALUE FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: ON CHAINS, SHOPS, AND NETWORKS , 1998 .

[5]  J. Keynes,et al.  The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. , 1936 .

[6]  Andrew von Nordenflycht.  What Is a Professional Service Firm? Toward a Theory and Taxonomy of Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 2010 .

[7]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[8]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[9]  Judy McKay,et al.  The dual imperatives of action research , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[10]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Informating the Clan: Controlling Physicians' Costs and Outcomes , 2004, MIS Q..

[11]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Guest editorial cultural issues and it management: looking ahead , 2003 .

[12]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  The balanced scorecard: a foundation for the strategic management of information systems , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[14]  Kurt Lewin,et al.  The Research Center for Group Dynamics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. , 1945 .

[15]  Robert Davison,et al.  GSS and action research in the Hong Kong police , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[16]  Rikard Lindgren,et al.  Design Principles for Competence Management Systems: A Synthesis of an Action Research Study , 2004, MIS Q..

[17]  E. Trist,et al.  Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-Getting , 1951 .

[18]  Ned Kock,et al.  Information systems action research: serving two demanding masters , 2001 .

[19]  Maris G. Martinsons.  Relationship‐based e‐commerce: theory and evidence from China , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[20]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Special issue on action research in information systems: making is research relevant to practice--foreword , 2004 .

[21]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Trying to improve communication and collaboration with information technology: An action research project which failed , 1999, Inf. Technol. People.

[22]  Christine Halverson,et al.  The value of persistence: a study of the creation, ordering and use of conversation archives by a knowledge worker , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[23]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[24]  J. Pearce,et al.  Guanxi: Connections As Substitutes for Formal Institutional Support , 1996 .

[25]  S. Ghoshal.  Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices , 2005 .

[26]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[27]  M. Markus.  Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[28]  M. Boisot.  Exploring the information space: a strategic perspective on information systems , 2004 .

[29]  Glen R. Burrows,et al.  Knowledge management in China , 2005, CACM.

[30]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on information systems in China , 2008 .

[31]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Ethnographic Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Peter Adam Angeles.  The HarperCollins dictionary of philosophy , 1992 .

[33]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Principles of canonical action research , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[34]  J. Cunningham.  Action Research and Organizational Development , 1993 .

[35]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system , 1996 .

[36]  Rob Cross,et al.  A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[37]  Steven L. Alter.  Defining information systems as work systems: implications for the IS field , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Maris G. Martinsons,et al.  Developing international organizational change theory using cases from China , 2009 .

[39]  Mariëlle den Hengst,et al.  Collaborative Business Engineering: A Decade of Lessons from the Field , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[40]  H. Barger.  The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money , 1936, Nature.

[41]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Knowledge Collaboration Among Professionals Protecting National Security: Role of Transactive Memories in Ego-Centered Knowledge Networks , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[42]  Rikard Lindgren,et al.  User involvement in developing mobile and temporarily interconnected systems , 2010, Inf. Syst. J..

[43]  M. Porter.  Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[44]  C. Gersick.  REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE THEORIES: A MULTILEVEL EXPLORATION OF THE PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM PARADIGM , 1991 .

[45]  K. Weick.  What Theory Is Not, Theorizing Is , 1995 .

[46]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[47]  Maris G. Martinsons,et al.  Management information systems in the Chinese business culture: An explanatory theory , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[48]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[49]  Michael J. Earl,et al.  Knowledge Management Strategies: Toward a Taxonomy , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  A hermeneutic interpretation of a controlled laboratory experiment: a case study of decision‐making with a group support system , 2012, Inf. Syst. J..

[51]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Pluralist action research: a review of the information systems literature * , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[52]  J. Keynes,et al.  The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. , 1936 .

[53]  C. Eden,et al.  Action Research for Management Research , 1996 .

[54]  Maris G. Martinsons.  Strategic Innovation: A Lifeboat for Planning in Turbulent Waters , 1993 .

[55]  K. Lewin.  Action Research and Minority Problems , 1946 .

[56]  Delvin Grant,et al.  A report on the use of action research to evaluate a manufacturing information systems development methodology in a company , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[57]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Advice for an action researcher , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.