Subtractive Clustering as ZUPT Detector

Inertial-based indoor pedestrian tracking that uses Micro electro mechanical Systems (MEMS) technology suffers undesirable positional drift over time. As widely attested, zero-velocity updates (ZUPT) from the stance phase reduce the error growth from a third order polynomial to a linear one. However, researchers are struggling to find consistent ZUPT, especially when the pedestrian walks naturally, which has changes in walking speed or unpredictable pauses. In this paper, a novel approach to extract the ZUPT based on subtractive clustering is proposed and discussed. Its performance is compared to other techniques using internally collected and publicly available datasets. The results show that the proposed method outweighs the others in providing consistent performance level.

[1]  F. Seco,et al.  A comparison of Pedestrian Dead-Reckoning algorithms using a low-cost MEMS IMU , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing.

[2]  Fabio Dovis,et al.  Analysis and modelling of MEMS inertial measurement unit , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Localization and GNSS.

[3]  Stephen L. Chin An Efficient Method for Extracting Fuzzy Classification Rules from High Dimensional Data , 1997, J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Informatics.

[4]  Nel Samama,et al.  INS and GNSS fusion enhancement based on a weighted reliabilities approach , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN).

[5]  Ramon López de Mántaras,et al.  Analysing the behaviour of robot teams through relational sequential pattern mining , 2010, ISMIS.

[6]  Alexander Dekhtyar,et al.  Information Retrieval , 2018, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[7]  Noureddine Manamanni,et al.  Position estimation approach by Complementary Filter-aided IMU for indoor environment , 2013, 2013 European Control Conference (ECC).

[8]  Isaac Skog,et al.  Evaluation of zero-velocity detectors for foot-mounted inertial navigation systems , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation.

[9]  Ling Chen,et al.  IMU/GPS based pedestrian localization , 2012, 2012 4th Computer Science and Electronic Engineering Conference (CEEC).

[10]  Ozkan Bebek,et al.  Personal Navigation via High-Resolution Gait-Corrected Inertial Measurement Units , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[11]  K. Abdulrahim,et al.  Using Constraints for Shoe Mounted Indoor Pedestrian Navigation , 2011, Journal of Navigation.

[12]  I-Ming Chen,et al.  Localization and velocity tracking of human via 3 IMU sensors , 2014 .

[13]  Rui Zhang,et al.  Indoor localization using inertial sensors and ultrasonic rangefinder , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP).

[14]  Eric Foxlin,et al.  Pedestrian tracking with shoe-mounted inertial sensors , 2005, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[15]  Stephen L. Chiu,et al.  Fuzzy Model Identification Based on Cluster Estimation , 1994, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[16]  Troels Andreasen,et al.  Foundations of Intelligent Systems , 2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[17]  Yao Tung Chuang,et al.  New Drift Reset Method for Pedestrian Tracking with a Low-Cost IMU , 2013 .

[18]  Fernando Seco Granja,et al.  Indoor pedestrian navigation using an INS/EKF framework for yaw drift reduction and a foot-mounted IMU , 2010, 2010 7th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communication.

[19]  Naser El-Sheimy,et al.  MEMS-Based Integrated Navigation , 2010 .

[20]  Yan Li,et al.  Dead reckoning navigation with Constant Velocity Update (CUPT) , 2012, 2012 12th International Conference on Control Automation Robotics & Vision (ICARCV).