The Micro-Shear Bond Strength of Various Resinous Restorative Materials to Aged Biodentine

Introduction: The type of materials and application time of veneering restorations on calcium silicate cements are important factors which influence the interfacial properties. The aim of this study was to measure the micro-shear bond strength of a resin composite (RC) using several adhesive systems and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RM-GIC) to different aged Biodentine specimens. Methods and Materials: A total of 15 Biodentine blocks were prepared and assigned to three aging periods: 12 min, one week and one month. Then they were subdivided into five sub-groups to receive cylinders of resinous materials. RC was applied using different adhesive systems: A) no adhesive B) etch and rinse C) two-step self-etch and D) universal adhesive in self-etch mode and E) RM-GIC applied directly over Biodentine. Micro-shear bond strength was measured and the data were analyzed using one-way and two-way ANOVA. The level of significance was set at 0.05. Result: There was significant interaction between Biodentine aging periods and resinous materials (P<0.05). The highest value was obtained in group D bonded to the recently set Biodentine. Increasing the aging period to one week resulted in increased micro-shear bond strength in all groups expect for group D. One-month incubation time led to reduced shear bond strength in group A, C and D. Micro-shear bond strength values of group E increased to the longer aged Biodentine. Conclusion: Group D showed the highest bond strength to freshly mixed Biodentine.

[1]  S. Talwar,et al.  Effect of acid etching on the micro-shear bond strength of resin composite–calcium silicate interface evaluated over different time intervals of bond aging , 2018, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[2]  E. Reynolds,et al.  Calcium silicate‐based cements: composition, properties, and clinical applications , 2017, Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry.

[3]  F. Koohpeima,et al.  Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer to Two Pulp Capping Materials , 2017, Iranian endodontic journal.

[4]  J. Guerreiro-Tanomaru,et al.  Bioactivity of MTA Plus, Biodentine and an experimental calcium silicate‐based cement on human osteoblast‐like cells , 2017, International endodontic journal.

[5]  O. Gamulin,et al.  Long Term Degree of Conversion of two Bulk-Fill Composites. , 2016, Acta stomatologica Croatica.

[6]  S. Tour Savadkouhi,et al.  Tooth discoloration induced by calcium-silicate based materials: a literature review. , 2016, Minerva stomatologica.

[7]  W. Oh,et al.  Evaluation of reparative dentin formation of ProRoot MTA, Biodentine and BioAggregate using micro-CT and immunohistochemistry , 2016, Restorative dentistry & endodontics.

[8]  K. Vandewalle,et al.  Mechanical properties of new dental pulp-capping materials. , 2016, General dentistry.

[9]  E. Reynolds,et al.  The physical properties and ion release of CPP-ACP-modified calcium silicate-based cements. , 2015, Australian dental journal.

[10]  E. Piva,et al.  Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, Journal of dentistry.

[11]  M. Kaup,et al.  Shear bond strength of Biodentine, ProRoot MTA, glass ionomer cement and composite resin on human dentine ex vivo , 2015, Head & Face Medicine.

[12]  M. Gandolfi,et al.  Calcium silicate bioactive cements: Biological perspectives and clinical applications. , 2015, Dental Materials.

[13]  M. Kaur,et al.  Biodentine: A Promising Dentin substitute , 2014 .

[14]  Seok-Woo Chang,et al.  Effects of calcium silicate endodontic cements on biocompatibility and mineralization-inducing potentials in human dental pulp cells. , 2014, Journal of endodontics.

[15]  K. Cantekin,et al.  Evaluation of shear bond strength of two resin-based composites and glass ionomer cement to pure tricalcium silicate-based cement (Biodentine®) , 2014, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[16]  Sayesh Vemuri,et al.  “Evaluation of sealing ability of MM-MTA, Endosequence, and biodentine as furcation repair materials: UV spectrophotometric analysis” , 2014, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[17]  Marco Colombo,et al.  Biocompatibility of a new pulp capping cement. , 2014, Annali di stomatologia.

[18]  E. Kazazoğlu,et al.  A Review on Biodentine, a Contemporary Dentine Replacement and Repair Material , 2014, BioMed research international.

[19]  W. Oh,et al.  Cytotoxicity and physical properties of tricalcium silicate-based endodontic materials , 2014, Restorative dentistry & endodontics.

[20]  T. Watson,et al.  The physical characteristics of resin composite-calcium silicate interface as part of a layered/laminate adhesive restoration. , 2014, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[21]  M. Ranjan,et al.  Review on Biodentine-A Bioactive Dentin Substitute , 2014 .

[22]  F. Riccitiello,et al.  In Vitro Screening of the Apatite-Forming Ability, Biointeractivity and Physical Properties of a Tricalcium Silicate Material for Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry , 2013 .

[23]  R. F. Kaptan,et al.  Effect of acid etching procedures on the compressive strength of 4 calcium silicate-based endodontic cements. , 2013, Journal of endodontics.

[24]  M. Odabaş,et al.  Shear Bond Strengths of Different Adhesive Systems to Biodentine , 2013, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[25]  G. Hartwell,et al.  An evaluation of setting time of mineral trioxide aggregate and EndoSequence root repair material in the presence of human blood and minimal essential media. , 2013, Journal of endodontics.

[26]  Nara Hellen Campanha Bombarda,et al.  Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. , 2013, Journal of dentistry.

[27]  J. Camilleri,et al.  Investigation of the physical properties of tricalcium silicate cement-based root-end filling materials. , 2013, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[28]  T. Komabayashi,et al.  Characterization of the mineral trioxide aggregate-resin modified glass ionomer cement interface in different setting conditions. , 2012, Journal of endodontics.

[29]  P. Cerri,et al.  MTA versus Portland cement: review of literature , 2011 .

[30]  M. B. Kayahan,et al.  Effect of acid-etching procedure on selected physical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. , 2009, International endodontic journal.

[31]  J. Camilleri Hydration mechanisms of mineral trioxide aggregate. , 2007, International endodontic journal.

[32]  G. Glickman,et al.  The effects of various additives on setting properties of MTA. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.

[33]  M. Fridland,et al.  MTA solubility: a long term study. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[34]  R. Oréfice,et al.  Effect of light intensity and irradiation time on the polymerization process of a dental composite resin , 2004 .

[35]  G. Schmalz,et al.  Bond strength of self-etching adhesives to dental hard tissues , 2002, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[36]  R. Price,et al.  In vitro comparison of 10-minute versus 24-hour shear bond strengths of six dentin bonding systems. , 1999, Quintessence international.

[37]  M. Torabinejad,et al.  Physical and chemical properties of a new root-end filling material. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.

[38]  M. Burrow,et al.  Early Tensile Bond Strengths of Several Enamel and Dentin Bonding Systems , 1994, Journal of dental research.