Parallel perception of vernier offsets, curvature, and chevrons in humans

A vernier offset is detected at once among straight lines, and reaction times are almost independent of the number of simultaneously presented stimuli (distractors), even if absolute orientation cues are masked by varied orientation of the verniers. This result implies that the human visual system processes vernier offsets in parallel. Reaction times for identifying one straight target among offset verniers, on the other hand, increase with the number of stimuli. The same is true for the identification of a vernier offset to one side among verniers offset to the opposite side, if absolute orientation cues are masked. These tasks require serial or semi-parallel processing. Chevrons and curved targets show the same pattern of results. Even deviations below a photoreceptor diameter can be detected at once. The visual system thus attains positional accuracy below the photoreceptor diameter simultaneously at different positions. I conclude that deviation from straightness, or change of orientation, is detected in parallel over the visual field. Discontinuities or gradients in orientation may represent an elementary feature of vision.

[1]  S B Steinman,et al.  Serial and Parallel Search in Pattern Vision? , 1987, Perception.

[2]  L. Riggs.  Curvature as a Feature of Pattern Vision , 1973, Science.

[3]  S. Klein,et al.  Hyperacuity thresholds of 1 sec: theoretical predictions and empirical validation. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[4]  S. Appelle.  Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  F. Attneave,et al.  What Variables Produce Similarity Grouping , 1970 .

[6]  J. Jonides.  Further toward a model of the Mind’s eye’s movement , 1983 .

[7]  B. Julesz.  A brief outline of the texton theory of human vision , 1984, Trends in Neurosciences.

[8]  H. Wilson,et al.  Discrimination of contour curvature: data and theory. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  Theodore E. Cohn,et al.  Why luminance discrimination may be better than detection , 1981, Vision Research.

[10]  G. Westheimer.  The spatial grain of the perifoveal visual field , 1982, Vision Research.

[11]  B. Julesz,et al.  Short-range limitation on detection of feature differences. , 1987, Spatial vision.

[12]  Y. Tsal.  Movements of attention across the visual field , 1983 .

[13]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[14]  R. W. Klopfenstein,et al.  Spatial-Frequency Model for Hyperacuity , 1985 .

[15]  L Iseberg.  Eccentricity effects in a visual attention task , 1991 .

[16]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.

[17]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification , 1985, Vision Research.

[18]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Computing texture boundaries from images , 1988, Nature.

[19]  James R. Bergen,et al.  Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination , 1983, Nature.

[20]  J. Beck,et al.  The effects of concentrated and distributed attention on peripheral acuity , 1973 .

[21]  B. Troost,et al.  Saccadic eye movement latencies to multimodal stimuli Intersubject variability and temporal efficiency , 1975, Vision Research.

[22]  G. Westheimer.  Diffraction Theory and Visual Hyperacuity* , 1976, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[23]  B. Kröse,et al.  The control and speed of shifts of attention , 1989, Vision Research.

[24]  D. Foster.  Visual discrimination, categorical identification, and categorical rating in brief displays of curved lines: implications for discrete encoding processes. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  D. Whitteridge,et al.  The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  F. Campbell,et al.  Vernier acuity: interactions between length effects and gaps when orientation cues are eliminated. , 1985, Spatial vision.

[27]  H. C. Nothdurft,et al.  The role of local contrast in pop-out of orientation, motion and color. , 1991 .

[28]  B Julesz,et al.  Stereopsis Based on Vernier Acuity Cues Alone , 1967, Science.

[29]  J Ogilvie,et al.  The perception of curvature. , 1967, Canadian journal of psychology.

[30]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Effects of practice and the separation of test targets on foveal and peripheral stereoacuity , 1983, Vision Research.

[32]  D. P. Andrews,et al.  Acuities for spatial arrangement in line figures: human and ideal observers compared. , 1973, Vision research.

[33]  G. Westheimer.  Eye movement responses to a horizontally moving visual stimulus. , 1954, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[34]  B. Julesz.  Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.

[35]  J Rovamo,et al.  Resolution of gratings oriented along and across meridians in peripheral vision. , 1982, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[36]  W. Becker,et al.  An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli , 1979, Vision Research.

[37]  Gerald Westheimer.  The oscilloscopic view: Retinal illuminance and contrast of point and line targets , 1985, Vision Research.

[38]  Charles W. Eriksen,et al.  Retinal locus and acuity in visual information processing , 1977 .

[39]  H. K. Nishihara,et al.  Hidden cues in random-line stereograms , 1982, Nature.

[40]  J. Beck.  Perceptual Grouping Produced by Changes in Orientation and Shape , 1966, Science.

[41]  B. Julesz,et al.  Detection versus Discrimination of Visual Orientation , 1984, Perception.

[42]  A. Treisman.  Focused attention in the perception and retrieval of multidimensional stimuli , 1977 .

[43]  Gerald Westheimer,et al.  Temporal and spatial interference with vernier acuity , 1975, Vision Research.

[44]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Responses of spatial mechanisms can explain hyperacuity , 1986, Vision Research.

[45]  J. Beck.  Perceptual grouping produced by line figures , 1967 .

[46]  H. Nothdurft.  Orientation sensitivity and texture segmentation in patterns with different line orientation , 1985, Vision Research.

[47]  R. J. Watt,et al.  The use of different cues in vernier acuity , 1983, Vision Research.

[48]  F. Attneave,et al.  Discriminability of stimuli varying in physical and retinal orientation , 1967 .

[49]  D. P. Andrews,et al.  Contour curvature analysis: Hyperacuities in the discrimination of detailed shape , 1982, Vision Research.

[50]  S. McKee,et al.  Improvement in vernier acuity with practice , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  P. E. Hallett,et al.  The predictability of saccadic latency in a novel voluntary oculomotor task , 1980, Vision Research.