Dynamic properties of Drosophila olfactory electroantennograms

Time-dependent properties of chemical signals are probably crucially important to many animals, but little is known about the dynamics of chemoreceptors. Behavioral evidence of dynamic sensitivity includes the control of moth flight by pheromone plume structure, and the ability of some blood-sucking insects to detect varying concentrations of carbon dioxide, possibly matched to host breathing rates. Measurement of chemoreceptor dynamics has been limited by the technical challenge of producing controlled, accurate modulation of olfactory and gustatory chemical concentrations over suitably wide ranges of amplitude and frequency. We used a new servo-controlled laminar flow system, combined with photoionization detection of surrogate tracer gas, to characterize electroantennograms (EAG) of Drosophila antennae during stimulation with fruit odorants or aggregation pheromone in air. Frequency response functions and coherence functions measured over a bandwidth of 0–100 Hz were well characterized by first-order low-pass linear filter functions. Filter time constant varied over almost a tenfold range, and was characteristic for each odorant, indicating that several dynamically different chemotransduction mechanisms are present. Pheromone response was delayed relative to fruit odors. Amplitude of response, and consequently signal-to-noise ratio, also varied consistently with different compounds. Accurate dynamic characterization promises to provide important new information about chemotransduction and odorant-stimulated behavior.

[1]  T. Baker,et al.  Odour-plume dynamics influence the brain's olfactory code , 2001, Nature.

[2]  J. V. van Hateren,et al.  Encoding of naturalistic optic flow by a population of blowfly motion-sensitive neurons. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  R. Barrozo,et al.  Orientation response of haematophagous bugs to CO2: the effect of the temporal structure of the stimulus , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[4]  A. S. French,et al.  Dynamic properties of antennal responses to pheromone in two moth species. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Solomon W. Golomb,et al.  Shift Register Sequences , 1981 .

[6]  E. Alcorta Characterization of the electroantennogram in Drosophila melanogaster and its use for identifying olfactory capture and transduction mutants. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Geier,et al.  Influence of odour plume structure on upwind flight of mosquitoes towards hosts , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[8]  John R. Carlson,et al.  The Molecular Basis of Odor Coding in the Drosophila Larva , 2005, Neuron.

[9]  A. S. French,et al.  A new method for wide frequency range dynamic olfactory stimulation and characterization. , 2007, Chemical senses.

[10]  R. Cardé,et al.  Influence of plume structure and pheromone concentration on upwind flight of Cadra cautella males , 1995 .

[11]  Bill S Hansson,et al.  Novel natural ligands for Drosophila olfactory receptor neurones , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[12]  K. Kaissling,et al.  Cell responses to single pheromone molecules may reflect the activation kinetics of olfactory receptor molecules , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[13]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[14]  F. Gribakin,et al.  Electroantennogram of the American cockroach: effect of oxygen and an electrical model , 1992, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[15]  J. Tukey,et al.  An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series , 1965 .

[16]  Julius S. Bendat,et al.  Engineering Applications of Correlation and Spectral Analysis , 1980 .

[17]  John Murtis,et al.  Odor Plumes and How Insects Use Them , 1992 .

[18]  M. Dicke,et al.  AGGREGATION PHEROMONES OF Drosophila immigrans , , 2007 .

[19]  Ring T. Cardé,et al.  Antennal resolution of pulsed pheromone plumes in three moth species. , 2002, Journal of insect physiology.

[20]  M. Renou,et al.  Electrophysiological study of the effects of deltamethrin, bioresmethrin, and DDT on the activity of pheromone receptor neurones in two moth species , 1992 .

[21]  A. S. French,et al.  The Efficiency of Sensory Information Coding by Mechanoreceptor Neurons , 1997, Neuron.

[22]  A. S. French,et al.  Shaker K+ channels contribute early nonlinear amplification to the light response in Drosophila photoreceptors. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Mark A. Willis,et al.  Effects of intermittent and continuous pheromone stimulation on the flight behaviour of the oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta , 1984 .

[24]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Integrating the Molecular and Cellular Basis of Odor Coding in the Drosophila Antenna , 2003, Neuron.

[25]  John R Carlson,et al.  Chemosensory Coding by Neurons in the Coeloconic Sensilla of the Drosophila Antenna , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Bill S. Hansson,et al.  Responses in highly selective sensory neurons to blends of pheromone components in the moth Agrotis segetum. , 2002, Journal of insect physiology.

[27]  Richard Benton,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity in Drosophila pheromone perception , 2007, Trends in Neurosciences.

[28]  John R Carlson,et al.  The Molecular Basis of Odor Coding in the Drosophila Antenna , 2004, Cell.

[29]  S. Maddrell,et al.  Amino acids modulate ion transport and fluid secretion by insect Malpighian tubules , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[30]  Steven Schofield,et al.  Flight behaviour of Cadra cautella males in rapidly pulsed pheromone plumes , 2002 .

[31]  R. Barrozo,et al.  Repetitive stimulation of olfactory receptor cells in female silkmoths Bombyx mori L. , 2002, Journal of insect physiology.