Pocket parks-a systematic literature review

The rapid process of urbanization and climate change have resulted in socio-environmental issues that necessitate viable intervention strategies to create green, sustainable, healthy, and livable built environments. One effective method of achieving this is through the development of pocket parks. Although several studies have explored the benefits and design principles of pocket parks, there is a lack of systematic and quantitative understanding, which could influence the decision-making process for the proper adoption of pocket parks. In view of this knowledge gap, this study employs bibliometric methods and critical review to quantitatively analyze and systematically review 276 papers published in the Web of Science and Scopus databases between 1977 and 2023. Firstly, a bibliometric analysis is conducted, providing a comprehensive overview of research on pocket parks. Secondly, a detailed critical review is conducted from three major perspectives: influencing factors, design methods, and benefits of pocket parks. Finally, the research trends and future directions are discussed. The results indicate that (a) pocket park development takes various forms, with a growing number of articles published each year. However, research on this topic is primarily concentrated in the United States and China, with significant knowledge gaps remaining globally. (b) The utilization of pocket parks is affected by various factors, including internal, external physical, and socio-economic factors. The mechanisms of these factors and their interactions demand deeper understanding. (c) There is a need to conduct an in-depth exploration of planning methods for pocket parks, and planning and design methods in different country contexts can be expanded and compared. (d) Further research is needed to compare the benefits of pocket parks in different climatic zones in terms of depth and width. The outcome of this study can contribute to the body of knowledge on pocket parks, foster their wider acceptance, and help urban planners, practitioners, policy makers, and government managers apply them more effectively in resilient and livable cities of the future.

[1]  F. Guo,et al.  A canopy shading-based approach to heat exposure risk mitigation in small squares , 2023, Urban Climate.

[2]  Xudan Zhou,et al.  Urban Parks—A Catalyst for Activities! The Effect of the Perceived Characteristics of the Urban Park Environment on Children’s Physical Activity Levels , 2023, Forests.

[3]  Jiachuan Yang,et al.  Urban road network design for alleviating residential exposure to traffic pollutants: Super-block or Mini-block? , 2023, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[4]  Joseph Heathcott,et al.  Design Highs and Policy Lows in the Making of New Public Space in Mexico City , 2022, Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability.

[5]  X. Liu,et al.  Attention and Emotion Recovery Effects of Urban Parks during COVID-19—Psychological Symptoms as Moderators , 2022, Forests.

[6]  Yupeng Wang,et al.  Cooling effect of the pocket park in the built-up block of a city: a case study in Xi’an, China , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[7]  Joseph Heathcott,et al.  Showcase politics: The production and distribution of new public space in Mexico City , 2022, Journal of Urban Affairs.

[8]  Gregory S. Macfarlane,et al.  City parks and slow streets: A utility-based access and equity analysis , 2022, Journal of Transport and Land Use.

[9]  Conghui Zhou,et al.  What Affects the Use Flexibility of Pocket Parks? Evidence from Nanjing, China , 2022, Land.

[10]  Yanchuan Mou,et al.  Gender difference in the chinese middle-aged and elderly of pocket park use: A case study of zongbei park , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[11]  H. Pearsall,et al.  How Do Different Modes of Governance Support Ecosystem Services/Disservices in Small-Scale Urban Green Infrastructure? A Systematic Review , 2022, Land.

[12]  Mohsen Faizi,et al.  Temporary reuse in leftover spaces through the preferences of the elderly , 2022, Cities.

[13]  Ji-Hyang Gu,et al.  Can Even a Small Amount of Greenery Be Helpful in Reducing Stress? A Systematic Review , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[14]  S. Lau,et al.  Spatial Differences in Outdoor Thermal Comfort during the Transition Season in Cold Regions of China , 2022, Buildings.

[15]  F. Guo,et al.  Optimization of green infrastructure networks based on potential green roof integration in a high-density urban area-A case study of Beijing, China. , 2022, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  Hazreena Hussein,et al.  Green Pause in a City: Design elements of a pocket park in Kuala Lumpur , 2022, Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal.

[17]  Yupeng Wang,et al.  Environmental Effects from Pocket Park Design According to District Planning Patterns—Cases from Xi’an, China , 2022, Atmosphere.

[18]  H. -. Kim,et al.  Urban green space alone is not enough: A landscape analysis linking the spatial distribution of urban green space to mental health in the city of Chicago , 2022, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[19]  F. Fratini,et al.  PLANNING WITH NATURE: SUSTAINABLE URBAN PROTOTYPES FOR PORTUENSE DISTRICT IN ROME, ITALY , 2021, The Sustainable City XV.

[20]  Federica Rosso,et al.  Pocket parks towards more sustainable cities. Architectural, environmental, managerial and legal considerations towards an integrated framework: A case study in the Mediterranean region , 2021, Environmental Challenges.

[21]  S. Ismail,et al.  The Sustainable City: The Characteristic Public Urban Green Space for Enhancing Community Social Sustainability in Baghdad , 2021, International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering Technology.

[22]  A. Abdu,et al.  Addressing psychosocial issues caused by the COVID-19 lockdown: Can urban greeneries help? , 2021, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[23]  Toru Terada,et al.  Use of Urban Green Spaces in the Context of Lifestyle Changes during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Tokyo , 2021, Sustainability.

[24]  Mohsen Faizi,et al.  Design possibilities of leftover spaces as a pocket park in relation to planting enclosure , 2021 .

[25]  Xinhao Wang,et al.  Reexamine the value of urban pocket parks under the impact of the COVID-19 , 2021, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[26]  Yanwen Xue,et al.  Using multi-source data to understand the factors affecting mini-park visitation in Yancheng , 2021, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science.

[27]  Hanyan Zhang,et al.  Pocket parks in English and Chinese literature: A review , 2021 .

[28]  Junxiang Li,et al.  Estimating the Cooling Effect of Pocket Green Space in High Density Urban Areas in Shanghai, China , 2021, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[29]  Khalilah Zakariya,et al.  QUALITY OF DESIGNS AND FEATURES OF SMALL URBAN GREEN SPACES IN PETALING JAYA TOWN, MALAYSIA , 2021 .

[30]  Bin Zhou,et al.  The motivation and factors influencing visits to small urban parks in Shanghai, China , 2021 .

[31]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Assessing mini-park installation priority for regreening planning in densely populated cities , 2021 .

[32]  S. Maruthaveeran,et al.  Factors contributing to the usage of pocket parks―A review of the evidence , 2021 .

[33]  Fei Wang,et al.  Behaviors of seniors and impact of spatial form in small-scale public spaces in Chinese old city zones , 2020 .

[34]  S. Ismail,et al.  Pocket parks for promoting social interaction among residents of Baghdad City , 2020, Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research.

[35]  Guohang Tian,et al.  Analysis of Cooling and Humidification Effects of Different Coverage Types in Small Green Spaces (SGS) in the Context of Urban Homogenization: A Case of HAU Campus Green Spaces in Summer in Zhengzhou, China , 2020 .

[36]  Jylana L. Sheats,et al.  A Mixed Method Study to Inform the Implementation and Expansion of Pop-Up Parks for Economic, Behavioral, and Social Benefits , 2020, Journal of Urban Health.

[37]  D. Babalis.  A new typology of pocket parks: inspiring small spaces for changing cities , 2020, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Urban Design and Planning.

[38]  A. Coutts,et al.  The microclimatic interaction of a small urban park in central Melbourne with its surrounding urban environment during heat events , 2020, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[39]  Vladimir Mikadze.  Landscape urbanism and informal space-making: insights from a guerrilla gardening case in Montreal, Canada , 2020 .

[40]  Tao Lin,et al.  Quantitative study on the cooling effect of green roofs in a high-density urban Area—A case study of Xiamen, China , 2020 .

[41]  S. Maulan,et al.  Investigating the usability pattern and constraints of pocket parks in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia , 2020, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[42]  P. Brimblecombe,et al.  Trees and parks as “the lungs of cities” , 2020 .

[43]  M. Elmaghraby.  Urban Pocket Parks Promoting Quality of Life and Mitigating UHI Impacts – A Case Study of “Al Zawya Al Hamra” District , 2019, Journal of Urban Research.

[44]  Cristián Henríquez,et al.  The influence of building density on Neotropical bird communities found in small urban parks , 2019, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[45]  Rita Labuz.  Pocket Park – A New Type of Green Public Space in Kraków (Poland) , 2019, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.

[46]  P. Weinstein,et al.  The Wellbeing Benefits Associated with Perceived and Measured Biodiversity in Australian Urban Green Spaces , 2019, Sustainability.

[47]  K. Gaston,et al.  Human–nature interactions and the consequences and drivers of provisioning wildlife , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  P. Brimblecombe,et al.  Dispersion of traffic derived air pollutants into urban parks. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[49]  F. Armato.  Pocket Park: Product Urban design , 2017 .

[50]  H. Ravn,et al.  The influence of small urban parks characteristics on bird diversity: A case study of Petaling Jaya, Malaysia , 2017, Urban Ecosystems.

[51]  M. Currie.  A design framework for small parks in ultra-urban, metropolitan, suburban and small town settings , 2017 .

[52]  Thomas L. McKenzie,et al.  The First National Study of Neighborhood Parks: Implications for Physical Activity. , 2016, American journal of preventive medicine.

[53]  H. Gibson,et al.  Pocket parks as community building blocks: A focus on Stapleton, CO , 2016 .

[54]  Yue Hu.  A Novel Planning of Vest-Pocket Park in Historic Urban Area in Metropolis: A Case Study of Beijing , 2016 .

[55]  Verónica Sevillano,et al.  Preference, restorativeness and perceived environmental quality of small urban spaces / Preferencia, restauración y calidad ambiental percibida en plazas urbanas , 2016 .

[56]  Karin Kragsig Peschardt,et al.  Identifying Features of Pocket Parks that May Be Related to Health Promoting Use , 2016 .

[57]  Keun-ho Kim,et al.  Attitudes of Citizens towards Urban Parks and Green Spaces for Urban Sustainability: The Case of Gyeongsan City, Republic of Korea , 2015 .

[58]  MaryCarol R. Hunter,et al.  Environmental affordances: A practical approach for design of nearby outdoor settings in urban residential areas , 2015 .

[59]  Karin Kragsig Peschardt,et al.  Evidence for Designing Health Promoting Pocket Parks , 2014 .

[60]  T. McKenzie,et al.  The Potential for Pocket Parks to Increase Physical Activity , 2014, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[61]  S. Barry.  Using Social Media to Discover Public Values, Interests, and Perceptions about Cattle Grazing on Park Lands , 2013, Environmental Management.

[62]  Michael W. Strohbach,et al.  Are small greening areas enhancing bird diversity? Insights from community-driven greening projects in Boston , 2013 .

[63]  S. Lau,et al.  A preliminary study on environmental performances of pocket parks in high-rise and high-density urban context in Hong Kong , 2012 .

[64]  Nazirah Zainul Abidin,et al.  Investigating the awareness and application of sustainable construction concept by Malaysian developers , 2010 .

[65]  Jianhua Hou,et al.  The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[66]  Andrew T. Kaczynski,et al.  Association of Parkland Proximity with Neighborhood and Park-based Physical Activity: Variations by Gender and Age , 2009 .

[67]  Ann Forsyth,et al.  Why small parks matter , 2005 .

[68]  Ann Forsyth,et al.  Designing Small Parks: A Manual for Addressing Social and Ecological Concerns , 2005 .

[69]  H. Staats,et al.  Alone or with a friend : A social context for psychological restoration and environmental preferences , 2004 .

[70]  W. Seymour.  Small Urban Spaces: The Philosophy, Design, Sociology, and Politics of Vest-Pocket Parks and Other Small Urban Open Spaces , 1969 .

[71]  Yanwen Xue,et al.  How do mini-parks serve in groups? A visit analysis of mini-park groups in the neighbourhoods of Nanjing , 2022, Cities.

[72]  Federica Rosso,et al.  Pocket parks for human-centered urban climate change resilience: Microclimate field tests and multi-domain comfort analysis through portable sensing techniques and citizens’ science , 2022 .

[73]  Yuan Zhang,et al.  Practical Research on the Application of Sponge City Reconstruction in Pocket Parks Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2021, Complex..

[74]  S. Tabassum.  Environmental Response of Small Urban Parks in Context of Dhaka City , 2018 .

[75]  Jun-Hyun Kim,et al.  The influence of small green space type and structure at the street level on urban heat island mitigation , 2017 .

[76]  Helena Nordh,et al.  Pocket parks for people – A study of park design and use , 2013 .

[77]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Pocket parks in a compact city: how do birds respond to increasing residential density? , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[78]  T. Hartig,et al.  Assessing restorative components of small urban parks using conjoint methodology , 2011 .

[79]  G. Fry,et al.  Components of small urban parks that predict the possibility for restoration , 2009 .