US daily temperature records past, present, and future

Significance Future changes in temperature extremes over the continental United States are represented by the ratio of daily record high maximum temperatures to daily record low minimum temperatures and computed as a function of mean temperature increase that does not depend on scenario. A nonlinear empirical fit of the relation between this ratio and average temperature, using observations from 1930 to 2015, is extended to 2100 and compared with the climate model projections. The projections of the ratio are somewhat higher than the empirical projection from observations, continuing a positively biased trend in daily record high temperatures in the 20th century in the models, which we link to less-than-observed summer precipitation and evapotranspiration. Observed temperature extremes over the continental United States can be represented by the ratio of daily record high temperatures to daily record low minimum temperatures, and this ratio has increased to a value of about 2 to 1, averaged over the first decade of the 21st century, albeit with large interannual variability. Two different versions of a global coupled climate model (CCSM4), as well as 23 other coupled model intercomparison project phase 5 (CMIP5) models, show larger values of this ratio than observations, mainly as a result of greater numbers of record highs since the 1980s compared with observations. This is partly because of the “warm 1930s” in the observations, which made it more difficult to set record highs later in the century, and partly because of a trend toward less rainfall and reduced evapotranspiration in the model versions compared with observations. We compute future projections of this ratio on the basis of its estimated dependence on mean temperature increase, which we find robustly at play in both observations and simulations. The use of this relation also has the advantage of removing dependence of a projection on a specific scenario. An empirical projection of the ratio of record highs to record lows is obtained from the nonlinear relationship in observations from 1930 to 2015, thus correcting downward the likely biased future projections of the model. For example, for a 3 °C warming in US temperatures, the ratio of record highs to lows is projected to be ∼15 ± 8 compared to the present average ratio of just over 2.

[1]  Wouter Dorigo,et al.  Satellite soil moisture for advancing our understanding of earth system processes and climate change , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[2]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Allowable CO2 emissions based on regional and impact-related climate targets , 2016, Nature.

[3]  K.,et al.  The Community Earth System Model (CESM) large ensemble project: a community resource for studying climate change in the presence of internal climate variability , 2015 .

[4]  Martin Beniston,et al.  Ratios of record high to record low temperatures in Europe exhibit sharp increases since 2000 despite a slowdown in the rise of mean temperatures , 2015, Climatic Change.

[5]  P. Huybers,et al.  U.S. Daily Temperatures: The Meaning of Extremes in the Context of Nonnormality , 2014 .

[6]  Eric A. Rosenberg,et al.  A Long-Term Hydrologically Based Dataset of Land Surface Fluxes and States for the Conterminous United States: Update and Extensions* , 2002 .

[7]  V. Brovkin,et al.  Impact of soil moisture‐climate feedbacks on CMIP5 projections: First results from the GLACE‐CMIP5 experiment , 2013 .

[8]  G. Hegerl,et al.  Detectable Changes in the Frequency of Temperature Extremes , 2013 .

[9]  C. Rowe,et al.  Trends in record‐breaking temperatures for the conterminous United States , 2012 .

[10]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Hot days induced by precipitation deficits at the global scale , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  R. Vose,et al.  An Overview of the Global Historical Climatology Network-Daily Database , 2012 .

[12]  W. G. Strand,et al.  Climate System Response to External Forcings and Climate Change Projections in CCSM4 , 2012 .

[13]  S. Rahmstorf,et al.  Increase of extreme events in a warming world , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  RCP 8.5—A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions , 2011 .

[15]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Improving canopy processes in the Community Land Model version 4 (CLM4) using global flux fields empirically inferred from FLUXNET data , 2011 .

[16]  Lisa V. Alexander,et al.  Climate science: Extreme heat rooted in dry soils , 2011 .

[17]  Sonia I. Seneviratne,et al.  Observational evidence for soil-moisture impact on hot extremes in southeastern Europe , 2011 .

[18]  A. Kostinski,et al.  Reversible Record Breaking and Variability: Temperature Distributions across the Globe , 2010 .

[19]  B. Trewin,et al.  Changes in the frequency of record temperatures in Australia, 1957-2009 , 2010 .

[20]  G. Meehl,et al.  Relative increase of record high maximum temperatures compared to record low minimum temperatures in the U.S. , 2009 .

[21]  Susan Solomon,et al.  Spatial and seasonal patterns in climate change, temperatures, and precipitation across the United States , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Benjamin I. Cook,et al.  Amplification of the North American “Dust Bowl” drought through human-induced land degradation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  B. Santer,et al.  Identification of external influences on temperatures in California , 2008 .

[24]  David Lobell,et al.  Empirical evidence for a recent slowdown in irrigation-induced cooling , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  On the Cause of the 1930s Dust Bowl , 2004, Science.

[26]  D. Easterling Recent Changes in Frost Days and the Frost-Free Season in the United States , 2002 .

[27]  Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan,et al.  Records: Arnold/Records , 1998 .

[28]  David R. Easterling,et al.  Effects of Recent Thermometer Changes in the Cooperative Station Network , 1991 .