Prediction of Long-Term Outcomes by Signal-Averaged Electrocardiography in Patients With Unsustained Ventricular Tachycardia, Coronary Artery Disease, and Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Background— An abnormal signal-averaged ECG (SAECG) is a noninvasive marker of the substrate of sustained ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction. We assessed its prognostic ability in patients with asymptomatic unsustained ventricular tachycardia, coronary artery disease, and left ventricular dysfunction. Methods and Results— A blinded core laboratory analyzed SAECG tracings from 1925 patients in a multicenter trial. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to examine individual and joint relations between SAECG variables and arrhythmic death or cardiac arrest (primary end point), cardiac death, and total mortality. We also assessed the prognostic utility of SAECG at different levels of ejection fraction (EF). A filtered QRS duration >114 ms (abnormal SAECG) independently predicted the primary end point and cardiac death, independent of clinical variables, cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, and antiarrhythmic drug therapy. With an abnormal SAECG, the 5-year rates of the primary end point (28% versus 17%, P =0.0001), cardiac death (37% versus 25%, P =0.0001), and total mortality (43% versus 35%, P =0.0001) were significantly higher. The combination of EF <30% and abnormal SAECG identified a particularly high-risk subset that constituted 21% of the total population. Thirty-six percent and 44% of patients with this combination succumbed to arrhythmic and cardiac death, respectively. Conclusions— SAECG is a powerful predictor of poor outcomes in this population. The noninvasive combination of an abnormal SAECG and reduced EF may have utility in selecting high-risk patients for intervention.

[1]  Ric,et al.  ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC TESTING TO IDENTIFY PATIENTS WITH CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE WHO ARE AT RISK FOR SUDDEN DEATH , 2000 .

[2]  K. Lee,et al.  A randomized study of the prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease. Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigators. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  J. Bigger,et al.  Mechanisms of death in the CABG Patch trial: a randomized trial of implantable cardiac defibrillator prophylaxis in patients at high risk of death after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. , 1999, Circulation.

[4]  Bigger Jt,et al.  Prophylactic use of implanted cardiac defibrillators in patients at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias after coronary-artery bypass graft surgery , 1997 .

[5]  L. Tavazzi,et al.  Remarks about postinfarction prognosis in light of the experience with the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell' Infarto Miocardico (GISSI) trials. , 1997, Circulation.

[6]  A. Moss,et al.  Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  J. Rouleau,et al.  Myocardial infarction patients in the 1990s--their risk factors, stratification and survival in Canada: the Canadian Assessment of Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) Study. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  A. Weyman,et al.  Insights into the mechanism of incomplete mitral leaflet closure from an in vivo study , 1996 .

[9]  P. Denes,et al.  Definition of the best prediction criteria of the time domain signal-averaged electrocardiogram for serious arryhthmic events in the postinfarction period , 1995 .

[10]  S. Winters,et al.  Determinants of induction of ventricular tachycardia in nonsustained ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction and the usefulness of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  K. Lee,et al.  Prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease: the Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial (MUSTT). , 1993, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[12]  J. Tijssen,et al.  Long-term benefit of early thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction: 5 year follow-up of a trial conducted by the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  S L Winters,et al.  The prognostic significance of quantitative signal-averaged variables relative to clinical variables, site of myocardial infarction, ejection fraction and ventricular premature beats: a prospective study. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  F. Harrell,et al.  Regression models in clinical studies: determining relationships between predictors and response. , 1988, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  J M Fontaine,et al.  Value of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram as a predictor of the results of programmed stimulation in nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  S L Winters,et al.  A new noninvasive index to predict sustained ventricular tachycardia and sudden death in the first year after myocardial infarction: based on signal-averaged electrocardiogram, radionuclide ejection fraction and Holter monitoring. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  M. Josephson,et al.  Results of signal-averaged electrocardiography and electrophysiologic study in patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia after healing of acute myocardial infarction. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  A. Castellanos,et al.  Spontaneous conversion of ventricular fibrillation in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  N. Sammel,et al.  Prediction of serious arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction: signal-averaged electrocardiogram, Holter monitoring and radionuclide ventriculography. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  J A Gomes,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the high-frequency components of the signal-averaged QRS complex in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a prospective study. , 1985, Circulation.

[21]  M. Josephson,et al.  Identification of patients with ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction: signal-averaged electrocardiogram, Holter monitoring, and cardiac catheterization. , 1984, Circulation.

[22]  P. Denes,et al.  Quantitative Analsis of the High‐frequency Components of the Terminal Portion of the Body Surface QRS in Normal Subjects and in Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia , 1983, Circulation.

[23]  L E Hinkle,et al.  Clinical Classification of Cardiac Deaths , 1982, Circulation.

[24]  M. Simson Use of Signals in the Terminal QRS Complex to Identify Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia After Myocardial Infarction , 1981, Circulation.

[25]  L Seipel,et al.  Non-invasive detection of late potentials in man--a new marker for ventricular tachycardia. , 1981, European heart journal.

[26]  Patricia L. Smith Splines as a Useful and Convenient Statistical Tool , 1979 .

[27]  R Lazzara,et al.  Recording from the body surface of arrhythmogenic ventricular activity during the S-T segment. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.

[28]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[29]  D.,et al.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 2022 .