The grinding tip of the sea urchin tooth exhibits exquisite control over calcite crystal orientation and Mg distribution

The sea urchin tooth is a remarkable grinding tool. Even though the tooth is composed almost entirely of calcite, it is used to grind holes into a rocky substrate itself often composed of calcite. Here, we use 3 complementary high-resolution tools to probe aspects of the structure of the grinding tip: X-ray photoelectron emission spectromicroscopy (X-PEEM), X-ray microdiffraction, and NanoSIMS. We confirm that the needles and plates are aligned and show here that even the high Mg polycrystalline matrix constituents are aligned with the other 2 structural elements when imaged at 20-nm resolution. Furthermore, we show that the entire tooth is composed of 2 cooriented polycrystalline blocks that differ in their orientations by only a few degrees. A unique feature of the grinding tip is that the structural elements from each coaligned block interdigitate. This interdigitation may influence the fracture process by creating a corrugated grinding surface. We also show that the overall Mg content of the tooth structural elements increases toward the grinding tip. This probably contributes to the increasing hardness of the tooth from the periphery to the tip. Clearly the formation of the tooth, and the tooth tip in particular, is amazingly well controlled. The improved understanding of these structural features could lead to the design of better mechanical grinding and cutting tools.

[1]  T. Tyliszczak,et al.  Assignment of polarization-dependent peaks in carbon K-edge spectra from biogenic and geologic aragonite. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[2]  Andreas Scholl,et al.  Gradual ordering in red abalone nacre. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[3]  O. Paris From diffraction to imaging: New avenues in studying hierarchical biological tissues with x-ray microbeams (Review) , 2008, Biointerphases.

[4]  Sidney R. Cohen,et al.  Sea Urchin Tooth Design: An “All‐Calcite” Polycrystalline Reinforced Fiber Composite for Grinding Rocks , 2008 .

[5]  F. Houlbrèque,et al.  Compositional variations at ultra-structure length scales in coral skeleton , 2008 .

[6]  P. Gilbert,et al.  Polarization-dependent imaging contrast in abalone shells , 2008 .

[7]  S. Weiner,et al.  Mineral Deposition and Crystal Growth in the Continuously Forming Teeth of Sea Urchins , 2007 .

[8]  Christopher J. Johnson,et al.  Architecture of columnar nacre, and implications for its formation mechanism. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[9]  P. Fratzl,et al.  A new experimental station for simultaneous X-ray microbeam scanning for small- and wide-angle scattering and fluorescence at BESSY II , 2006 .

[10]  D. Murphy,et al.  Nano-scale secondary ion mass spectrometry — A new analytical tool in biogeochemistry and soil ecology: A review article , 2007 .

[11]  S. Stock,et al.  Mapping of magnesium and of different protein fragments in sea urchin teeth via secondary ion mass spectroscopy. , 2006, Journal of structural biology.

[12]  S. Stock,et al.  Transmission electron microscopy characterization of macromolecular domain cavities and microstructure of single-crystal calcite tooth plates of the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus. , 2005, Journal of structural biology.

[13]  R. Dunbar,et al.  Distribution of magnesium in coral skeleton , 2004 .

[14]  M. Girasole,et al.  Spectromicroscope for the PHotoelectron Imaging of Nanostructures with X-rays (SPHINX): performance in biology, medicine and geology. , 2004, Ultramicroscopy.

[15]  J. Banfield,et al.  Microbial Polysaccharides Template Assembly of Nanocrystal Fibers , 2004, Science.

[16]  B. Gilbert,et al.  Compensation of charging in X-PEEM: a successful test on mineral inclusions in 4.4 Ga old zircon. , 2003, Ultramicroscopy.

[17]  F De Carlo,et al.  Three-dimensional microarchitecture of the plates (primary, secondary, and carinar process) in the developing tooth of Lytechinus variegatus revealed by synchrotron X-ray absorption microtomography (microCT). , 2003, Journal of structural biology.

[18]  B. Gilbert,et al.  The probing depth of total electron yield in the sub-keV range: TEY-XAS and X-PEEM , 2003 .

[19]  S. Stock,et al.  X-ray absorption microtomography (microCT) and small beam diffraction mapping of sea urchin teeth. , 2002, Journal of structural biology.

[20]  Jillian F. Banfield,et al.  Morphology development and crystal growth in nanocrystalline aggregates under hydrothermal conditions: insights from titania , 1999 .

[21]  S. Weiner,et al.  Design strategies of sea urchin teeth: structure, composition and micromechanical relations to function. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[22]  E. Kniprath Ultrastructure and growth of the sea urchin tooth , 1974, Calcified Tissue Research.

[23]  K. Markel The Tooth Skeleton of Echinometra mathaei (Blainville)(Echinodermata,Echinoidea) , 1970 .

[24]  J. Papike,et al.  Primary Protodolomite in Echinoid Skeletons , 1969 .

[25]  H. C. Heard,et al.  Subsolidus Phase Relations in the System CaCO3-MgCO3 , 1961, The Journal of Geology.

[26]  K. Märkel Morphologie der seeigelzähne , 2004, Zeitschrift für Morphologie der Tiere.