Ultrasound guidance for central venous catheter placement: results from the Central Line Emergency Access Registry Database.

BACKGROUND Ultrasound guidance of central venous catheter (CVC) insertion improves success rates and reduces complications and is recommended by several professional and regulatory organizations. METHODS This is a prospective observational study using data extracted from the Central Line Emergency Access Registry database, a multicenter online registry of CVC insertions from medical centers throughout the United States. We compared success rates with ultrasound and with the anatomic-landmark technique. RESULTS A total of 1250 CVC placement attempts by emergency medicine residents during the study period were selected from the Central Line Emergency Access Registry database. Because a few attempts (n = 28) were made to place lines in either the left or right supraclavicular locations, data on these attempts were eliminated from the analysis. A total of 1222 CVC attempts from 5 institutions were analyzed. Successful placement on the first attempt occurred in 1161 (86%) cases and varied according to anatomic location. Ultrasound guidance was used in 478 (41%) of the initial attempts. The remainder of placements were presumably placed using the anatomic-landmark technique based on visible surface and palpatory subcutaneous structures. Overall successful placement rate did not vary according to the use of ultrasound guidance, nor did it vary at different anatomic sites. However, ultrasound was found to be significant for reducing the total number of punctures per attempt (P < .02, t = 2.30). CONCLUSIONS Our study did not observe improved success with the use of ultrasound for CVC cannulation on the first attempt, but we did observe a reduced number of total punctures per attempt.

[1]  D. Feller-Kopman Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement: the new standard of care? , 2005, Critical care medicine.

[2]  J. Hall,et al.  Real-time ultrasound-guided femoral vein catheterization during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. , 1997, Annals of emergency medicine.

[3]  T. Milling,et al.  Randomized controlled trial of single-operator vs. two-operator ultrasound guidance for internal jugular central venous cannulation. , 2006, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[4]  K. McDonald,et al.  Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. , 2001, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[5]  T. Mills,et al.  Ultrasound guidance versus the landmark technique for the placement of central venous catheters in the emergency department. , 2002, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[6]  B. Levine,et al.  CLEAR: Central Line Emergency Access Registry. The CLEAR project protocol methods paper. , 2009, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[7]  A G Randolph,et al.  Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of the literature. , 1996, Critical care medicine.

[8]  M. Blanda,et al.  Ultrasound-assisted internal jugular vein catheterization in the ED. , 1998, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[9]  Daniel Hind,et al.  Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  Eric De Groot,et al.  Real-time ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the internal jugular vein: a prospective comparison with the landmark technique in critical care patients , 2006, Critical care.

[11]  P. Abboud,et al.  Ultrasound guidance for vascular access. , 2004, Emergency medicine clinics of North America.

[12]  J. Clinton,et al.  Ultrasound is a necessary skill for emergency physicians. , 2006, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.